Sentences with phrase «just big pharma»

Network — New drug development is now more «ecosystem» based, not just big pharma alone, and UK has lots of large, medium and small pharma, in both private and public institutions (Universities, Francis Crick Institute, etc.).

That is just Big Pharma trying to steal your money and make you cry during the fly faced children commercials!

Not exact matches

We need to stand up in arms and take back our world from Big Pharma, Big Tobbacco, Big Insurance and really just big companiBig Pharma, Big Tobbacco, Big Insurance and really just big companiBig Tobbacco, Big Insurance and really just big companiBig Insurance and really just big companibig companies.

It is hard to get good information, because just like big pharma, big supplement companies have an agenda — and its to make money by selling their products.

Just because it wasn't obtained via prescription or manufactured by Big Pharma makes it no less a risk to your delicate intestinal health.

So you just trust Big Pharma, THe AMA, and the FDA?

James started his career as an investment banker, but he had studied health economics, which is a really interesting field because we're looking at not just economics but we're looking at how do people spend their money to live longer, and feel better, and to stay well, and decided after a year in banking that he wanted to work with integrative medicine or functional medicine, and he founded something called Evolution of Medicine, which is an eCommerce platform that lets doctors manage their practices better with customized tools and things like that so they can become more functional doctors, just to make it easier for the transition to come from basically a trained representative of Big Pharma.

public health humiliation = huge private accumulation (profit)... because a chronic disease «managed» using chronic prescription drugs it's the best way to make money... but maybe i am a pessimistic guy and big pharma is really a good entity, they just did their job after all...

-LSB-...] are the answer to almost every condition, a situation that suits Big Pharma just fine.

Setting the fact that the bias from big pharma (which we know include / control / owns dairy industry etc.) is real and even documented and not just potential, how can you compare the «potential» bias of somebody who has very high economic interest in having a specific result coming out of the study with that of somebody who is simply following a related social, scientific, religious, pratical etc. pattern?

It's just I see a particular direction of big Pharma, and not necessarily one that promotes or insures the health of either humans or canids, but lines the Industry's pockets by playing on our fears.

It's just that science and scientists, climate scientists in particular, still haven't caught tup with the fact that a lot of science is now being seen by the public as equally grubby in it's attempts to enhance it's own status as the lawyers and legal fraternity or the big pharma of the medical world or the shenanigans of the financial and accountancy world and all the other grubbiness inherent in any profession that seeks to elevate itself and it's practitioners to a high public, power wielding status by fair means or foul

Because they are in the pay of big pharma who just want to sell us drugs to make us sick so that they can make us more sick.

Was the medical community just paid off puppets of a Big Pharma - Government - Media conspiracy?