Sentences with phrase «just about every author»

All that said, I'm «trying» just about every author who has weighed in on this issue.
It's true that just about every author has their own unique story about how they acquired their agent, but the Superstars Writing Seminar prepares you for what you need to do when you're ready to go to market with your finished manuscript.
As great as bookmarks are, just about every author has one, so what can you -LSB-...]
but he does it better than just about any author.
This can get confusing though, so I should clarify: this is just the About the Author section on Amazon.
Just about any author who's interested in book promotion — or that soon will be the case.
But for just about any author or publisher who might consider participating in an AutoRip - style bundle allowing Amazon to send out Kindle copies of books for which they have previously sold hard copies, there is bound to be a price at which the proposition would be appealing.
Some of us blog, others tweet, and just about every author has a website.
I think just about every author I know is living out their childhood dream of being a published author and there is really something to be said for that as well.
If you ask just about any author, they'll tell you that they're tired of getting traditional gifts for the holidays.
It might sound simplistic to ask whether reviews really matter, but just about every author who goes through the process of seeking out reviews ends up asking themself this question.

Not exact matches

In addition to wearing their writer's hat, self - published authors need to do just about everything that goes into packaging, marketing, and selling books, like building an author platform.
(By the way, as you read the conclusions keep in mind the authors are not talking just about high - tech entrepreneurs.
The founder of VaynerMedia, VaynerSports and Vayner / RSE is also an author, host and vlogger who records just about everything he does.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/06/opinion/sunday/alt-right-asian-fetish.html «Professor Wu found that just months before the release of the 1965 Moynihan Report, the widely influential policy paper that attributed black poverty to a degenerate black culture, its author, Daniel Patrick Moynihan, spoke at a gathering of intellectuals and policymakers about how Japanese - and Chinese - Americans, considered «colored» just 25 years earlier, were «rather astonishing.»
It's been a real treat to, in back - to - back weeks, feature two authors I've learned more from in the last five years than just about anyone else.
Just make sure they remain complete and unaltered (including the «about the author» info at the end), and you send a copy of your reprint to [email protected]
In the US, bloggers and authors such as Rachel Held Evans and Sarah Bessey have written about egalitarian theology and are supporting feminism in a way that is accessible to those who are just discovering feminism, as well as for seasoned advocates.
While this strategy works just fine for large publishers that already have established brands and get thousands of shares on any new article they publish (such as Mashable or TechCrunch), a more pragmatic approach is needed for just about every other business.It's true that getting quality inbound links starts with great content on your client's website, but the missing link is getting journalists, contributors, authors, and editors at quality publications to become aware of that content so that they can link to it when writing relevant stories / articles.
Initially, this list was made up of influencers we found by tracking keywords (like «content marketing») in Google Alerts, authors in industry trade publications, those who were talking about the topic on Twitter, and other bloggers that we just found interesting.
«The Christian Church has started to realize that we're sexual, too, and we are just as visually stimulated as men and we look at porn,» said Crystal Renaud, author of the recent book «Dirty Girls Come Clean,» a memoir about her own addiction to porn.
In my experience, the phrase usually pops up when an author wants to write about a topic just because he finds it interesting, but feels like readers won't care about the topic unless he can convince them it's somehow important.
The second is more along the lines of author Frank Herbert, who explored in his Byzantine * Dune * saga just about every major system of power dynamics from religious / mystical to technological to political to tribal to financial to ecological to physical.
We could go on and provide numerous similar examples, not just from the writings of John, but from other New Testament authors as well, but we have seen from just a couple of examples that present participles in connection with perfect tense verbs do not clearly indicate anything about the timing of one compared to the other.
the author doesn't say that one can't have an opinion on an issue just because the bible doesn't have a clear stance on it... he's simply saying that it doesn't make sense to have such a strong, skewed and one sided stance on an issue that the bible isn't clear about.
I re-read a book recently, and the author wrote about how she was supposed to speak at an event, and when she asked which topic they would like to here her expound upon, they said, well, just tell us what is saving your life right now.
The same argument could be made about the entire bible — being that it's an assembly of writings from unverifiable authors... just say «n.
That is why we have so much confusion about «religion», the Devil is the author of confusion and he wants us all mixed up and at each others» throats just because we all don't agree or we all don't act like a Christian should act.
Also, even if the author didn't believe in a god and just meant «goodness» this would still, I think, be talking about a «faith» that good would win out.
One of the reasons I am thinking about all of this is because of the book I just read, Unmasking the Powers, and what the author said in there about the angels of nations, and how national pride and patriotism for the country could be a form of idolatry.
The author uses the words «sin willfully» (note that in the Greek it does NOT say «go on sinning») which can be taken out of context to mean just about anything, but IN context it specifically is referring to the forsaking of Christ in the face of persecution.
I think the author is way off on just about everything.
But whereas in translating scientific prose the aim is simply to reproduce with complete accuracy the author's statements, in translating «poetic» language the primary aim is not just to reproduce statements about reality but, as far as may be, to make the same communication of reality — which will mean trying to reproduce something of the author's «tone of voice», something of the mood and colour of tie original.
This is not because I am an experienced eBook author (though I did just publish my first eBook), but because I am trying to learn more about the process, and wanted to share what I learn with you.
The author of a new book, Magnificent Desolation, Aldrin argues, «More than just exploring a hostile new world, Apollo 11 was about bold vision and great risk, about the obstacles a great nation could overcome with dedication, courage and teamwork.
McGrath's quotations include Richard Dawkins» fellow evolutionary theorist D. S. Wilson's put down of the God Delusion author as: «just another angry atheist trading on his reputation as an evolutionist and spokesperson for science to vent his personal opinions about religion.»
I re-read a book recently, and the author wrote about how she was supposed to speak at an event, and when she asked which topic they would like to here her expound upon, they said, well, just tell us what...
Ha... I just realized that the guy who made the comment about «teaching Christ's commands» isn't the author of this blog.
And of course, popular author and speaker Eric Metaxas published a book just last year that, in part, catalogues modern - day miracles that happen around the world (And RELEVANT talked with him about it).
I have a lot of similar questions about BIble, just like the author does.
Just as studying an artist's painting or an architect's building tells us much about the human author, so too does the study of the natural sciences lead us to understand the Aauthor, so too does the study of the natural sciences lead us to understand the AuthorAuthor.
This passage doesn't say anything about marriage, but I guess if the author wanted to make the point that gays have the ability to receive the Holy Spirit just like anyone else, then he is correct.
btw, about the issue of taxes on the rich that the author talks about, it has just come to notice that a lot of rich americans are giving up their citizenship to save on taxes.
God inspired the Old Testament authors to write about Him in a violent way so that He could do the same thing for Israel that Jesus did on the cross: Just as Jesus became sin for us, God became sin for Israel.
Mark Twain is just about my favorite author of all time, and Adventures of Huckleberry Finn is one of my favorite books.
Interesting discussion — Totally agree about the «punching above their weight» problem with the current spate of «popular» atheists and junk writers, as well as the «Hollywood» treatment of Pullman, but you don't need to wade through Pullman's trilogy to get a useful insight into institutionalism vs genuine spirituality — just pick up the excellent «The Dragon in the Sea» by Dune author Frank Herbert or «The Moon is a Harsh Mistress» by Robert Heinlien — great works from the Golden Age of Science Fiction literature.
We honestly don't know anything about any eyewitnesses other than what «unknown authors» have written, and we don't know how many of those stories from those unknown authors are simply copy - cat stories — just someone from a different town that heard the tale, but happened to know how to write.
When I hit the link to the author, I just saw some really angry posts about Calvinists... not sure where that came from.
In my proposal, God is not just getting human authors to write the incorrect ideas about Him which they already have, but God is actively inspiring the ideas themselves.
«Truly damaging speech can not be excused just because it expresses genuine religious belief,» says Mark D. Jordan, author of «Recruiting Young Love: How Christians Talk about Homosexuality.»
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z