Sentences with phrase «just about every corporation»

For example, in just about every corporation that I've worked with involving e-discovery, the IT professionals have an extensive and thorough handle on e-mail.

Not exact matches

As long as you accept that fact, you can then talk seriously about just what bundle of rights and responsibilities corporations ought to have — that is, what form their personhood should take.

S&P 500 corporations had about $ 900 billion in surplus cash socked away as of mid-2012, 40 % more than just prior to the credit crisis, says The Economist.

He found they spent anywhere from 70 % to 90 % of their time in meetings, but «when I asked what they were doing about making meetings better, almost all of the leaders of large corporations that I talked to just sort of shrugged their shoulders with a resigned air of defeat.»

But the corporation's brass know that the fix can't just be about efficiency: they must change the business model dramatically.

It's just one reminder about the challenges of doing business with China: the government still maintains a tight grip on its corporations, and Beijing's wishes come first.

Corporations just want to make sure their trading costs are contained and are indifferent about who is on their side, said one lawyer in Washington who has worked on derivatives reform.

When you're talking about a widely - held, multibillion dollar corporation like Target, talk of the organization's «real purpose» just sounds silly.

Congress enacted a repatriation holiday in 2004, allowing corporations to bring back about $ 300 billion from overseas and pay just 5.25 percent rather than the regular 35 percent corporate rate.

Congress» last tax amnesty occurred in 2004, when global U.S. corporations brought back about $ 300 billion from overseas and paid a tax rate of just 5.25 percent rather than the regular 35 percent U.S. corporate rate.

«Most corporations are just beginning to think about diversity in the non-representation sense.

Big corporations just don't seem to give a crap about a dissatisfied customer.

So at the end of the day, even as a follower of the teachings of Jesus Christ (the name Christian has been so stained, refuse to call myself one to distance myself from traitors to God like Bush and just about every Conservative American), I'd vote for an astheist with good ideas and was brave enough to push for the interests of people, not corporations, then I would vote for them.

In 2006, Americans donated just over $ 295 billion dollars to charitable causes: about $ 223 billion in individual giving outright, $ 36 billion through philanthropic foundations, $ 22 billion through individual bequests at death, and $ 13 billion through business corporations.

Just about every aspect of the Olive Garden restaurants was developed from consumer research conducted in a corporate think tank by the General Mills Corporation.

nice to see you crawl out of your hole just in time to offer your 2 cents worth once again... unlike yourself I started following this team long before Wenger arrived on the scene and will continue to do so long after he's gone... in his earlier years I admired the cerebral elements he brought to the EPL, which at that point was more brutish than beautiful, and I respected the seemingly tireless efforts of Arsene, Dein & staff to uncover and develop talent without sacrificing the product on the field... likewise I appreciated that such a youthful manager wasn't afraid to bring strong personalities and / or world - class players into the fold without being fearful of how said players would potentially undermine and / or dilute his authority... unfortunately this all changed about 10 years ago and culminated in the removal of all our greatest players, both young and old, without any real replacements coming in... from Henry to RVP to Fabergas and Nasri, it was easy to see that this club was no longer interested in competing at the highest levels... instead of being honest, minus the ridiculous claims regarding the new stadium, Wenger chose to side with management and in doing so became the «front man» for this corporation pretending to be a world - class soccer club... without the «front man» this organization would have been exposed numerous years earlier, so his presence was imperative if the facade was to continue... it's for this reason and more that I despise what this once great man and Kroenke has done to my beloved club... the gutless, shameful and manipulative way they have treated the fans, like myself, is largely indefensible and this is why I felt it necessary to start offering my opinion in a public format... trust me, I resisted the temptation for many years but as long as the same shit continues to exist I will voice my opinions and if you don't like it maybe you should look for a different team to pretend to follow

The fans that don't like him now are the ones that complain about the violence of football, or are invested in Dupree and / or Tomlin, or percieve the Steelers as a sort of street gang / mafia as in for life or blood out when the reality is it's just another large corporation that you and I happen to love.

Corporation A may just find it convenient to profit from information found about Corporation Y during the investigation authorized against Corporation X. Will the strict controls applied to privateers hold?

A public employees Union is like just about any other Union except that the corporation is just a whole lot bigger and has a lot more shareholders.

Mayor Bill de Blasio said Friday that his major concern about legalizing marijuana is that big corporations will take over the industry and exploit its «addictive» nature to try to hook kids, just like the tobacco companies.

Just a few months earlier, however, board members at both development corporations had been raising their own concerns about the entities» procurement rules.

It's tough to manage your schedule when you work for a corporation and have little control over it but it's just as hard when you are passionate about what you do and work for yourself.

I just think it depends on what kind of organic we're talking about factory farm, you know, big corporations have started labeling things organic.

Well the film was wide release, so it makes sense there wasn't an entirety of focus on the specifics, but I still think it would have worked better if it was more like the trailers professed intentions; doco style, with vignettes of alien / human scenes that emphasized and helped explain, not found footage either, like for example, after talking about Wikus in the past tense, it could focus on him for a bit then move on, but it stuck with him, and the film changed gears, I just thought it would have been better to focus on other things, as opposed to dumbing the plot down to one man and his battle against the evil government / corporation, and still stay in the doco style, it could have worked, no?

Up in the Air (R for profanity and sexuality) Jason Reitman directs this screen adaptation of Walter Kirn's best seller about a peripatetic hatchet man (George Clooney) for a downsizing corporation who suddenly finds himself grounded just when he's on the brink of accumulating ten million frequent flyer miles and right after he's also fallen for a like - minded traveler (Vera Farmiga).

But I believe that around the mid-1980s, when corporations began to become more powerful that some nation states, that the battle for critical democratic citizenship became just a smokescreen for the production of consumer citizenship and critical pedagogy as it was then conceived became more like a dying star about to go into a supernova stage and incinerate any hope we had for real educational transformation, locked as we were within a neoliberal state that was quickly consolidating itself (and that a few decades later would have transformed itself into a security state akin to fascism).

Users hated it; people and corporations just refused to buy it after learning about others» unpleasant and unproductive experiences with it.

It is a private corporation that regularly takes in about $ 185 million a year, $ 647 from just about every public school teacher in the state.

Walter P. Chrysler is the man behind the Chrysler Corporation, which is now a household name to just about every American when the topic of conversation steers towards vehicles.

(Note: WMG Publishing, with about 240 titles up and employees, is just now moving to a corporation structure.)

For me the article just cemented what Baker, I believe, is about: a Luddite not about technology, but about his idea of what a corporation should act like.

I don't think the giant international corporations that control the big publishers aren't savvy, they just aren't being honest about their real agenda.

Over the last 10 days, Intel Corporation has seen some strong gains, gaining about $ 0.80, or just under 4 %, during that time frame (including today).

None of the characters are interesting, and the dialogue is just a series of F - bombs and ho - hum observations about the awfulness of corporations.

Then the corporations would be happy; they'd be sitting in some fat cash, and maybe, just maybe, they wouldn't have to worry about leaks...

They are voicing their opinions, just as I am, and this doesn't justify jumping in front of a bullet for a corporation that doesn't care about you.

Station is (at it's core) a game about about an underwater expedition; taking place deep in the Arctic Ocean, it follows a survey crew sent by the ARC Corporation to search for exploitable natural resources... a survey crew that just stumbled upon something horrible.

Just as you prefer to post «axioms» about the economics of deploying photovoltaics today while ignoring actual economic facts that have led numerous major corporations to invest heavily in large - scale PV deployments, you prefer to ignore what I actually write here, and instead just make stuff up, pretend that I said it, and make bullying demands that I substantiate YOUR nonsense with citatiJust as you prefer to post «axioms» about the economics of deploying photovoltaics today while ignoring actual economic facts that have led numerous major corporations to invest heavily in large - scale PV deployments, you prefer to ignore what I actually write here, and instead just make stuff up, pretend that I said it, and make bullying demands that I substantiate YOUR nonsense with citatijust make stuff up, pretend that I said it, and make bullying demands that I substantiate YOUR nonsense with citations.

What has more truthiness is that a giant corporation employing world - class IP law firms can get just about anything rubber - stamped by the US PTO if they obfuscate it sufficiently.

I only found out about Ecotricity today, and am shocked (though I shouldn't be) that what's happening here clearly demonstrates that «global warming» can't be the real issue, or corporations like EDF would realise that what they are doing ultimately (when actual costs are counted), is increasing their carbon footprint (just think of all the people, documents, transportation that are needed over the course of a court - case).

The publication Naturbruksupproret which is about reclaiming power over the use of land and natural resources, illustrates how important it is to shift the power balance from corporations to local producers in the transition to a just and sustainable society.

C'm on Bart, just be up - front about your loony - left motivation (hatred of corporations etc), stop trying to dress up as a friend of freedom.

Decisions about the environmental impact of US cars and trucks are concentrated in the hands of just a few corporations.

You know, we had oil dependence problems in the»70s, we started the Synfuels Corporation — too expensive, went bankrupt; now people are again concerned about fuel dependence & oil dependence... aren't we kind of just going through the same cycle again?»

A new study attempts to do that, and says that more than a quarter of sea level rise and about half the warming from 1880 to 2010 can be traced back to just 90 corporations.

In other words, everything that is good about markets — in terms of freedom, in terms of altruism, generosity, cosmopolitanism — all of that has been driven into the ground by the concentration of market power in the hands of just a few corporations.

The United States, which just spent nearly a trillion dollars bailing out its floundering financial corporations and spends about $ 700 billion annually on the military, offered an obscenely inadequate $ 1.2 billion in aid.

After getting the people out, the next step was to actually move the industries and offices out of the dense urban cores, where so many corporations could be taken out with a single bomb, and establish them in suburban corporate campuses where just about every one of them would be a separate target.

Yes, it would certainly be better for corporations like ExxonMobil, which alone makes about ONE HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS PER DAY IN PROFIT from fossil fuels, if climate scientists who understand that a rapid phaseout of fossil fuel consumption is urgently needed if we are to have any hope of averting the most catastrophic outcomes of AGW, would just stick to the science and keep their mouths shut about that so as not to «spur political action» to save civilization from destruction.

It has some flaws, but it is miles (or kilometers) ahead of just about every other large corporation that isn't specifically selling green products.