Sentences with phrase «just absorb heat»

Not exact matches

Reduce heat to medium - low, cover and let simmer until liquid is completely absorbed and rice is just tender, about 40 minutes.

Dial back the heat and simmer, covered, until the water is absorbed and the quinoa is just cooked through - 15 minutes or so.

The oats absorb the milk overnight just like they would in a hot pan over medium heat, and leave a beautiful thickened breakfast just waiting for you.

Cover the pot, lower the heat to medium low and cook about 20 minutes, or just until the liquid is almost absorbed and the farro is cooked through but still chewy.

Reduce heat, cover and simmer for about 15 minutes, until water is absorbed and quinoa is just tender.

These molecules initially comprise just a small fraction of the gas, but they can absorb heat from the surrounding gas and get rid of it by emitting light, thereby cooling the cloud enough for stars to form.

If scientists can get a good handle on exactly how the thermal effects play out, they could steer a threatening asteroid into a safe orbit just by painting parts of its surface black (to absorb heat) or white (to reflect).

New vegetable - based materials absorb and release heat an unlimited number of times — with applications not just in beverages, but in keeping infants warm and soldiers cool.

This process, just like evaporation, absorbs heat and further cools the snow.

But just as something painted black is very good at both emitting and absorbing heat, a semiconductor that is very good at emitting photons is also very good at absorbing them.

If you'd rather cook a big pot of quinoa for multiple uses, simply put the portion you'd like to use for the porridge into a pot (or a bowl if you're doing the microwave thing), just barely cover with milk, and heat until most (but not all) of the liquid has been absorbed.

Cover the pot, lower the heat to medium low and cook about 20 minutes, or just until the liquid is almost absorbed and the farro is cooked through but still chewy.

Bring to a boil, then reduce the heat and simmer, with the saucepan lid just slightly open, for approximately 15 minutes or until the liquid is absorbed.

Easily absorbed by the skin without greasy feeling just like putting a lotion on it while a pure coconut oil has a greasy feeling because it has been heated in the process.

The paper illustrates the importance of remembering that the atmosphere and ocean surface are just a small component of the Earth's climate system — with the ocean depths having a vast capacity to absorb and move heat on time scales ranging from years to centuries and longer.

The convective heat / mass transfer due to water dwarfs any radiative forcing; besides — just on optical depth alone, any re-radiated LWIR from atmospheric CO2 would be IMMEDIATELY absorbed by the much higher concentration of water vapor in the atmosphere (aka clouds!)

Just in front of the south wall is a layer of SunTuf corrugated polycarbonate glazing to reduce heat loss from the absorber.

Carbon pollution is trapping heat, and the oceans are absorbing almost all of it.That extra heat was just more ammunition for Hurricane Harvey.

But within those layers of atmosphere, carbon dioxide molecules absorb heat, just like the bricks in your chimney absorb heat from a fire.

The deep sea has a large enough heat capacity to absorb all that heat, but just assuming that all the heat can be fed to deep ocean without changes in the rest of circulation is not realistic.

However, these changes are mostly just causing the oceans to absorb more heat, leaving less for the atmosphere.

Here are just some of the many benefits that these systems provide all at once: green infrastructure absorbs and sequesters atmospheric carbon dioxide (C02); filters air and water pollutants; stabilizes soil to prevent or reduce erosion; provides wildlife habitat; decreases solar heat gain; lowers the public cost of stormwater management infrastructure and provides flood control; and reduces energy usage through passive heating and cooling.

Thermal equilibrium doesn't mean the same temperature, if for example, a gas in getting hotter expands and rises becoming less dense and under less pressure it can move faster, it's using thermal energy to move, there's no energy lost, it's just become something else, or, as temperature relates to kinetic energy not thermal energy then heat capacity comes into play, as water can absorb a huge amount of thermal energy before there's any rise in temperature, or whatever, but if you're equating all «energy» to «heat» as thermal energy then that's a different idea altogether, not all energy is heat.

In my opinion, the most important of theseis is the 19th century science of Arrhenius compared with the 29th century science of James Chadwick who discovered the neutron — a particle heavy enough to change the heat absorbing powers of gases like CO2 — not just their kinetic energy, but their vibrational energy as well.

Since to me (and many scientists, although some wanted a lot more corroborative evidence, which they've also gotten) it makes absolutely no sense to presume that the earth would just go about its merry way and keep the climate nice and relatively stable for us (though this rare actual climate scientist pseudo skeptic seems to think it would, based upon some non scientific belief — see second half of this piece), when the earth changes climate easily as it is, climate is ultimately an expression of energy, it is stabilized (right now) by the oceans and ice sheets, and increasing the number of long term thermal radiation / heat energy absorbing and re radiating molecules to levels not seen on earth in several million years would add an enormous influx of energy to the lower atmosphere earth system, which would mildly warm the air and increasingly transfer energy to the earth over time, which in turn would start to alter those stabilizing systems (and which, with increasing ocean energy retention and accelerating polar ice sheet melting at both ends of the globe, is exactly what we've been seeing) and start to reinforce the same process until a new stases would be reached well after the atmospheric levels of ghg has stabilized.

Since those 15 micron photons are impacting a surface that is already radiating away from the hugely more massive surface (speaking at molecular level) those photons will be absorbed and radiated out again because the heat store just below the molecular surface is at a higher energy potential.

It's a problem for the climate because the black soot particles are just the right color to absorb heat from the sun, either in the upper atmosphere or when it settles back down to earth on Arctic snow and ice (when soot - free, the polar ice caps reflect a tremendous amount of light and heat back into Space, helping keep the planet cool).

When soot falls on snow and ice it increases the amount of light and heat that is absorbed, just like any reflective surface.

I believe that our presence here, on earth, in the numbers that we have managed to achieve, coupled with the fact that we have destroyed millions upon millions of oxygen producers (Trees) and have a penchant for asphalt and tarmac, which are very heat absorbing, and purposely keep reflective surfaces to a minimum (they're blinding) AND have created a civilization based on burning fossil fuels and using other things which are detrimental to our ecology, that, yes, we are probably responsible in large for the exelerated melting of the global ice... but, we have been in a state of warming since the last ice age ended... we just speeded up the process.

It is just that (for a given earth surface temperature) the heat flow away from the earth is less than it would be if the (IR - absorbing) atmosphere were not present.

«Joel Shore said on Visualizing the «Greenhouse Effect» — Light and Heat May 13, 2011 at 6:52 pm «It is just that (for a given earth surface temperature) the heat flow away from the earth is less than it would be if the (IR - absorbing) atmosphere were not presHeat May 13, 2011 at 6:52 pm «It is just that (for a given earth surface temperature) the heat flow away from the earth is less than it would be if the (IR - absorbing) atmosphere were not presheat flow away from the earth is less than it would be if the (IR - absorbing) atmosphere were not present.

This is confirmed when he later says (also page 5): «When a blackbody has reached thermal equilibrium, it can no longer absorb more light for heating and therefore has to re-emit just as much light - energy as it is absorbing.

Being on the border - line of missing heat is just as bad as having the oceans absorb excessive heat.

cementafriend, thanks for bring this up: «If convection occurs before radiation and the temperature of the atmosphere just above the surface is the same as the surface then it is clear that radiation to absorbing gases (CO2 and water vapour) will be zero because there is no net heat transfer between objects at the same temperature.».

To say that a body is not emitting as much as it is absorbing is just another way as saying that the body is heating up.

Not just the sheer volume but the great abilty of that ice mass to absorb heat and send it down where there are ice at -60 ºC.

Sense Seeker says: December 16, 2010 at 8:09 pm «You attribute all that [to] the urban heat effect, but couldn't it just be that the capacity of the ocean to absorb heat is so much greater than that of land?»

Just a few of the Galaxy J5 customers absorb also reported about heating issues, but they're only just a Just a few of the Galaxy J5 customers absorb also reported about heating issues, but they're only just a just a few.