It breaks my heart that so many people
just accept the notion that relationships inevitably start out hot and fizzle over time.
Not exact matches
After a pretty lame attempt to explain to him how doubt has actually enriched my faith over the years, how walking with a limp has made me more dependent on the steady shoulder of my heavenly Father, and how I don't really want to be fixed if being fixed means
accepting without question or concern the
notion that God creates the majority of the human population for hell with no hope for salvation, I decided
just to turn the response over to you guys instead.
oday's Christians tend to be followers,
accepting of the
notion that religion is
just a box built by someone else into which they must stuff their spirit.
I can
accept the
notion that a God
just exist, and if those want to play on that concept we can take it even further and say why could God not have come out of a Big Bang as well.
You wholeheartedly
accept the
notion that a super complex creator
just «exists» without any explanation at all, yet, you find it unreasonable that a universe could
just «exist» without having been created.
Our society
just can't
accept the
notion of a woman without a sex life, no matter how otherwise extraordinary she may be.
«I
just didn't
accept the
notion that we were derelict in our duty if we didn't kill animals.»
This is
just a view for illustration that I feeel no need for the
notion that a little or even any a lot of radiatively forced variation is incompatible with the
accepted median for the sensitivity or its range.
As it happens, the
notion of «being
just» is extremely variable, since there is no generally -
accepted understanding of what «justice» even means.
As for all of those who refuse to
accept this
notion,
just stop looking at court - mandated online mediation, chargeback systems, UDRP domain name dispute processes and other technologically assisted conflict resolution systems and solutions as ODR, and start practicing to say «TADRS».