Fifty posts and NO SCIENCE FACTS OR THEORIES —
just ad hominem attacks on a man that helped keep the West free and whose work has added billions of dollars of wealth through applications of his work.
no you can not and therefore
just another ad hominem attack easily debunked.
Martin, your «reasoning» is
just an ad hominem attack.
Not exact matches
Those that do are
just guilty of an
ad hominem fallacy;
attacking a person's grammar / spelling instead of the actual point of the comment.
and the
ad hominem attacks continue... boo hoo... I don't have a valid argument to counter his claims... I'll
just call him names to make myself feel better...
Oh yes I
just love
ad hominem attacks lol.
A little tidbit
just in case someone should feel that an
Ad Hominem Attack is waranted: I am a Veteran of the United States Armed Forces and I WILL defend this country to the death.
@proof2006: disqus I was really hoping that you were going to clarify something, instead of
just going for
ad hominem attacks about how I'm stupid for wanting a lot of storage on my phone.
There are exceptions; notably a lot of recent reviews of a best - selling memoir have
attacked the author instead of the book, but when a book has lots of reviews it's easier
just to skip over the obvious
ad hominem attacks of small - minded people, especially those who like to write in all caps.
I usually ignore the all too typical
ad hominem attacks, but when provided with an actual argument, or with evidence that appears to contradict one of my assertions, I've consistently responded — usually by citing hard evidence, not
just offering an opinion.
Maybe it's easier and more emotionally satisfying to
just engage in
ad hominem attacks because you can not refute the evidence right in front of you.
You are
just using an
ad hominem attack on the web site where I found the referenced article and that is sufficient for you to discredit all the data so carefully accumulated in that article.
Second, I don't «deny» anything, that is a pathetic
ad hominem attack that
just makes you look like a pathetic noob.
Re 42 ray ladbury > Steve, do you have a specific allegation against some of Gore's figures, or is this
just another excuse for an
ad hominem attack?
To help with my research on logical fallacies and
ad hominem attacks I was wondering if the following selection of comments lifted from
just two threads on here represent legitimate intellectual
attacks on a persons ideas, motivations and political agenda?
Your
ad hominem attacks are
just distracting, and reminiscent of the precise type of attitude towards discussing discrimination that we are trying to eradicate here.
I make a point of really trying to avoid
ad hominem attacks, but this time I
just can't help myself.