But now we're
just arguing over details; the hard part is actually convincing the Hall of Fame to do something that's better than what they've got now.
Whether you all realize it or not, you are really
just arguing over whether alcoholism is a disease or a lack of will power.
Then
we just argued over which cassette tapes to play.»
Essentially we would get the color of the ball itself, but then people would
just argue over what color was displayed.
We have to come to some sort of agreement about what these terms mean from a quantitative point of view, otherwise
we just argue over different interpretations of what those terms mean.
Not exact matches
«We need to invest every defense dollar to meet the threat that we're facing right now as a nation,» she told CNN's Wolf Blitzer later on Wednesday,
arguing that the Obama administration's decision to allow transgender people to serve would cost $ 1.35 billion
over a decade
just for sex - reassignment surgeries.
This is familiar ground for the SocGen strategist, who
argued back in April that the British government could «concrete
over the entire length and breadth of the UK and house prices would still rise»
arguing that Britain doesn't actually have a shortage of housing,
just a big imbalance in supply and demand.
Nobody would
argue that employees should be sad and downtrodden, yet it seems as though some businesses and their managers set out with the intention of presiding
over a group of miserable people, and then succeed in doing
just that.
I mean, people have often
argued that small - cap stocks do better
over long periods of time
just because they're small.
EMH proponents
argue that events like those dealt with in behavioral finance are
just short - term anomalies, or chance results, and that
over the long term these anomalies disappear with a return to market efficiency.
Why don't we stop
arguing about how stupid one religion is
over the other and
just let people live their lives.
When Jesus said in Mark 14:7 «The poor you will always have with you,» He probably was referring to the fact that 2000 years later we'd still be
arguing over how, what, when, where, etc. to do with the poor,
just as all of the above comments bear out.
Both sides in the dispute
over the reality of an educational canon
argue in
just this way, presupposing the truth of their predetermined views concerning the nature of reality and hence of how best to learn about it.
The agnostics sits pretty,
just watching a the atheist and believer
argue pretty much
over this unwinable debate.
then again I could
just be
arguing over nothing considering I agree with your idea.
It's
just a dumb thing to
argue or fight
over.
I suppose you are right, the fact that I continue to respond is in direct opposition to my premise that»
Arguing over the beliefs of atheists is
just useless».
As I have
argued in these pages and elsewhere, the «presumption,» by detaching the
just war way of thinking from its proper political context» the right use of sovereign public authority toward the end of tranquillitas ordinis, or peace» tends to invert the structure of classic
just war analysis and turn it into a thin casuistry, giving priority consideration to necessarily contingent in bello judgments (proportionality of means, discrimination or noncombatant immunity)
over what were always understood to be the prior ad bellum questions («prior» in that, inter alia, we can have a greater degree of moral clarity about them).
Another reason is that I'm
just tired of the ministers
arguing and fighting
over members and doctrines.
I can't believe (well I guess I
just don't want to) people still
argue over religion.
I have christian friends from other churchs and there women do these things and they do it because that is how they interpret the word.Its optional and not inforced by the church or by there husbands.They do it as an act of worship to the Lord.The point is how you interpret the word that was what i was getting at as we know the word is the inspired word of God to understand it we need the inspiration of the holy spirit otherwise the word is dead and brings no life.In the case of mother etta she was called to preach and God used her as an evengelist in her day her ministry grew she witnessed to thousands she healed the sick and saved the lost you can
argue over a point but the proof is there that God uses women
just as he uses men in ministry today.
I guess we are back to why I
just don't
argue over «truth», in the philosophical sense.
Ask the owner to do this instead of a mosque
just for one religions culture.How a community of Americans with different ideas and religions can come together and voice their beliefs and why it is so.Support America its time we all get together on one page.Stop the hatreds and misunderstandings of one another.This would be not only a great time for it but a place such as a United Understanding of Religions building could surface.Now that would be a great way of continuing on after 9 - 11or... we can fight
argue and fuss
over things we understand not, with no one stepping up to find common ground.Which is it going to be?Hate or understanding?You have the moment, seize it for humanity.Not
just one peoples.
Guns are very effective deterrents, and given that 99.9996 % of gun owners don't go out and kill anyone with guns (that's, 35000 murders (assuming one murder per gun owner, which is a generous number, divided by 100m gun owners, which own about 270m guns in the US), it's mind numbingly stupid to
argue that GUNS are the problem, or that even legal gun owners are the problem, when you're more likely to get run
over by a car (and 13 times more likely to
just die of cancer).
And this is what we Atheists are trying to explain to those who keep expressing this sentiment — you're
arguing semantics
over the time, but you still believe the «end» will happen as the bible says, so you are essentially issuing the same warning
just with less confidence of when it will happen.
just leave the debate to scholars, you're not convincing people
over the internet that you're right... it's not worth
arguing... it
just makes you look hateful... so... seriously folks like «colin» or «willie» or «laughing» if you're so sure in your beliefs..
Just like the folks in North Carolina and Tennessee
argue over whether sauce should be tomato - based or made with vinegar and cue fans in Texas and Kansas City carry on the beef versus pork controversy, barbecue's bite is open to debate.
Id take Cavani
over Giroud too, you
just cant
argue against the heights (numbers) he has reached within the game.
on a must win season for RM i cant see him backing a guy who is known to fight with the GM
over power,
just saying; maybe why madden was there not RM but idk... RM i believe likes yes men who do nt
argue, hence DA's hiring..
Can I
just say I'm Irish I go rugby and international games and conor megregor fites we as fans are mental we
just fight and
argue over everything we're passionate our stadiums are rocking and make no mistake our footballers are poor but they fite for badge
just like Northern Ireland, now my point is was at 2 arsenal game last season can't afford go a lot family work etr.
I'm sure there would be some
arguing between fans
over whether or not it was intentional, but it'd be a much better situation than what we have now where the vast majority of DoG penalties you see are for guys who are
just trying to clear the zone and get their aim slightly off.
While it is true that you don't want to see players
just walking all
over umpires, there's a better way to do that than giving a player the quick hook — especially when the player didn't verbally
argue balls and strikes.
However, when looking at Inman's career, I would
argue 2016 is the outlier and he's probably closer to what he has been
over the other 3 years of his career — which is
just - a-guy.
Maybe the fact that eight of his 32 goals this season came in the Champions League proves his quality or maybe the boss
just can not
argue with
over 90 goals in his three seasons at Porto.
Hes actually an AKB but probably got tired of
arguing with the opposing side so now he
just posts
over exaggerated AOB opinions in an attempt to make them look stupid.
My children have been
arguing incessantly
over who gets to play with the truck, which shows you
just how great it is and how wide the appeal.
It is sad that I have to say this but,
just so you know, I have no issue with people who switch to formula or don't even breastfeed at all — I am fed up of people
arguing over how we feed our babiesand although I'm pro breastfeeding that does not make me anti bottle feeding.
People can
argue about the benefits of one
over the other until they are blue in the face —
just let them.
It makes it look like he's the one who cares about what is important, while others are
just playing petty politics and
arguing over semantics.
A nervous Vince Cable started debating the measure
just after midday, as a packed House of Commons saw emotional MPs
argue over the ethics of the decision to try and triple the fees.
For proof of grassroots donors» importance,
just look to recent history: small donors gave Obama an edge
over both Hillary Clinton and John McCain that I'd
argue was decisive in 2008, and they very nearly made Bernie Sanders the Democratic nominee last year.
Focusing on a notion of accountability which is broader than
just league tables and published measurement scores, the Big Education Inquiry
argued for greater local control
over schools and education and a democratic input into local school systems.
For four minutes, the NYPD police officer who had
just fired his gun into a darkened housing project stairwell
argued with his partner
over whether to tell their superiors about the shot.
He
argued that moving benefits around to ensure families» income is
just over an artificial threshold will not make a real difference to their lives.
Just as the students would disagree on whether the clock tower was to Ellis» right or left, depending on where they stood, two people in Einstein's block universe could even
argue over the order in which events occurred.
The body's influence
over our perceptions is more than
just academic — it could have serious consequences in high - stakes situations,
argues Jessica Witt, a psychologist at Colorado State University.
He and Bramble
argue that not only can humans outlast horses, but
over long distances and under the right conditions, they can also outrun
just about any other animal on the planet — including dogs, wolves, hyenas, and antelope, the other great endurance runners.
Steve: You know, today is also the anniversary of the death of Darwin, speaking of the human evolution with Kate, and
just to finish up — am I wrong, but isn't the place you're most likely to find a fistfight at a conference, one of these human evolution anthropology conferences where people are
arguing over whether that bone represents a new species or
just an example of a known species or whether some artifact is again a new species or some kind of pathological example of an old species?
If you do not agree with PHD or feel the need to
argue over the core concepts, then
just disregard the forum and stop wreaking havoc on those who follow it and have finally found stability with our health
I stopped
arguing with her once I realized I could
just go
over to my friend Anna's house and eat whatever I wanted.