But
just as a statement of fact, I don't think I could have loved this game if I didn't have the issue of Nintendo Power with all its maps.
Not exact matches
There is no place where the Bible actually states that marriage * should * be between a man and a woman, rather than
just discussing it
as a
statement of fact.
Otherwise, you adopt the same kind
of mindset they do when they expect people to
just accept their
statements as facts, yet they provide no evidence to support them...
More to the point, the context speaks about confession
of faith and love
of one another — are these regulative
statements or
just as conveniently non-binding on you, someone who clearly does not take much joy in the
fact that the bible * instituted * ecclesial offices?
Not a
statement of fact as you made it out to be, I did not know for certain,
just what I read on the web.
Posting a website doesn't make your diatribe anymore truthful... you are an evangelical atheist troll who hangs out on the religion blog and attacks all people
of faith... I'm not saying this
as an insult but
just a
statement of fact... it's what you do but it doesn't have to be this way... I think you know enough to know that your way ends in an eternity
of anguish... attack me now to save face but please open your hardened heart and take your own journey to find God... ignore the radical wingnuts because this is your own journey.
I think we agree on the
fact that it is by faith that all are saved i have no problem with that and its in that that there is unity.You find within any christian modern church law can be mixed with Grace that is not peculiar to any domination maybe it is more extreme in some.Where there are believers there are works
of the flesh such
as pride and self reliance.I was thinking today the word says if we believe in our hearts and confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord then you shall be saved.Its not a hard doctrine to believe thats in its basic form.The seventh day have tacked on to that belief adherence to the sabbath that is sadly how denominations spring up.In the anglican church we still recite the apostles creed how many church still do that today
as a basis for there faith in Jesus Christ.Your
statement that some are saved is
just as true to those who go to modern christian churchs who say they are christian but walk according to the flesh..
Members
of the Niebuhrian generation were quite capable
of very radical
statements about God,
statements that were in
fact just as radical
as Altizer's.
Should I have the money, and a child in the public education system, I belive I could take the issue to court and win that educators must always preface any remark that deals with the theory
of evolution with
statements such
as: «it is thought» or «there is reason to believe» or some or qualifying
statement indicating that it is
just a theory, not
fact.
Further to my disappointment is the
fact that Ella provides
statements such
as «if you're allergic to nuts unfortunately this recipe
just isn't for you» for numerous recipes, and also suggests the use
of other nuts
as alternatives for the ones used in the recipes?
By far the best article I have ever read on this site, there was no bias or empty
statements,
just cold hard
facts, the writer even respected wengers budget but still pointed to where he should've improved, there are no excuses, what you read is literrally all u get with arsene, if you gave him a budget
of 9m or 1 billion, he will ALWAYS take the risk cause he doesn't give a fk about the consequences
as if he was a teenager raging through puberty, his stubborn is absolutely pathetic, can you believe he turned down signing a keeper when almunia was shocking, can you believe he didn't sign a CB when squillaci was awful, can you believe that he REFUSED to sign a CDM for almost 8 years, CAN you believe on one
of the most important transfer windows
of arsenals history, arsene decided to go host charity matches in rome, that's right instead
of trying hard for the fans that have respected him and pay him one
of the highest managerial wages in the world, he decided to do what he pleased
as usual, cause he doesn't answer to anyone, nor does he giving a flying fk, gazidis a man i thought was also a crook went and did arsene's job for him and at least got us a striker (which cost us the title in january last season) and arsene foolishly proclaims that «if i was here we wouldn't
of signed danny» meaning we wouldn't
of had ANY recognised cf till giroud recovered, arsene wenger is a joke
of the highest order, lack
of respect, lack
of shame and lack order, i despise him
Picture this, we don't come out
of the gate firing on all cylinders, Wenger speaks
of how there wasn't enough time for the first - teamers to build chemistry, several key players aren't even playing because
of Wenger's utterly ridiculous policy regarding players who played in the Confed Cup or the under21s and the boo - birds have returned in full flight... if these things were to happen, which is quite possible considering the Groundhog Day mentality
of this club, how long do you think it will take for Wenger to recant his earlier
statements regarding Europa... I would suggest that it's these sorts
of comments from Wenger which are often his undoing... why would any manager worth his weight in salt make such a definitive
statement before the season has even started... why would any manager who fashions himself an educated man make such pronouncements before even knowing what his starting 11 will be come Friday, let alone on September 1st... why would any manager who has a tenuous relationship with a great many supporters offer up such a potentially contentious talking point considering how many times his own words have come back to bite him in the ass... I think he does this because he doesn't care what you or I think, in
fact he's more than slightly infuriated by the very idea
of having to answer to the likes
of you and me... that might have been acceptable during his formative years in charge, when the fans were rewarded with an scintillating brand
of football and success felt like a forgone conclusion, but this new Wenger led team barely resembles that team
of ore... whereas in times past we relished a few words from our seemingly cerebral manager, in recent times those words have been replaced by a myriad
of excuses, a plethora
of infuriating stories about who he could have signed but didn't and what can only be construed
as outright fabrications... it's kind
of funny that when we want some answers, like during the whole contract debacle
of last season, we can't get an intelligent word out
of him, but when we
just what him to show his managerial acumen through his actions, we can't seem to get him to shut - up... I beg you to prove me wrong Arsene
Time for some brutal honesty... this team,
as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the
fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition
of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release
of Sanogo... if you look at the
facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this
statement I will briefly discuss the current state
of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid
of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in,
as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position...
as far
as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy
of our time and / or investment,
as such we should get rid
of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid
of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction
of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return
of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort
of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative
of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition
of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle
of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any
of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind
of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack
of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer
as a result
of his presence on the pitch...
as for the rest
of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands
of Wenger and Gazidis, the
fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none
of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club
of this size and financial might... the
fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid
of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is
just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent
just as much time on the training table
as on the field
of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version
of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history
of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the
fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet
of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival
of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone
of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players
of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that
of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani...
just part
of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the
fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the
fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore
as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet
of those who were well aware all along
of the potential pitfalls
of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
Anyway this is
just a blog
of passionate Arsenal supporters with different points
of view and
as I have said frequently some
of you meet up quite regularly for games and one can express oneself and have a debate with one another and agree or disagree there can be no misunderstanding, whilst with different styles and level
of writing, various
statements, opinions, or
facts can be unintentionally misunderstood
And it undeniably plays differently in the wake
of worker strikes today for «A Day Without Immigrants» and greater divides between the working class and the President
of the United States than when the film premiered at Toronto last year (which is not meant
as a political
statement,
just a
fact, and not an alternative one).
Should we take these two
statements — one that is factually wrong and the other which is guess stated
as fact —
as an indication that your post is
just a lot
of puffery, something you imagine while hallucinating?
Speechlessness, however, affirmed in the diagnosis, is carefully based on the
facts of the examination,
as we see by rendering the
statements concerned,
just as they stand in examination and diagnosis: «If thou examinest a man having a wound in the temple,...; if thou ask
of him concerning his malady and he speak not to thee;...; thou shouldst say concerning him, «One having a wound in his temple,... (and) he is speechless».
What is sad is that there are probably lots
of folks who have been told the same thing and
just relied on the
statement as being
fact.
In
fact, if you have the yearly spend
of the Kennedys and use the Chase Sapphire Preferred ® Card, then you would actually be better off
just using the Chase Freedom Unlimited ® Card's cash - back
as statement credit by $ 3.
The next stages are easy to predict
as well — the issues
of «process» will be lost in the noise, the fake overreaction will dominate the wider conversation and become an alternative
fact to be regurgitated in twitter threads and blog comments for years, the originators
of the issue may or may not walk back the many mis -
statements they and others made but will lose credibility in any case, mainstream scientists will
just see it
as hyper - partisan noise and ignore it, no papers will be redacted, no science will change, and the actual point (one presumes)
of the «process» complaint (to encourage better archiving practices) gets set back because it's associated with such obvious nonsense.
Just as missing data in some areas
of climate science does nt prevent us from making rational
statements about global warming, so to the
fact of missing mails does not prevent us from describing clearly what we do know about the mails.
If the wife subsequently refuses to testify, whether or not it is
just to admit
as hearsay evidence the
statement she made to the police depends upon the
facts of the individual case.
Viewing jury instructions this way I think would mean that it is part
of the role
of the jury to determine which parts
of the jury instructions should be considered
fact, and I think it would also mean that jury nullification wouldn't necessarily mean that a jury returns «a verdict
of «Not Guilty» despite its belief that the defendant is guilty
of the violation charged»; it could
just mean that the jury doesn't accept all
of the
statements in the jury instructions, such
as the judge's interpretation
of the law,
as fact.
(NOTE: This
statement is
just a viewpoint
of the author and it shall not be considered
as a
fact or law)
Several
of the basic mindfulness techniques are hypothesized to reduce emotional reactivity: mindful listening (i.e., listening attentively in a non-reactive and non-judgemental way); acknowledging and labeling emotional states in a non-personal way, in order to avoid being swept up in a negative emotional cycle («there is anger»); noting feelings
as passing mental events; viewing partner's angry
statements as «
just words» rather than
facts; and having the intention to act compassionately towards one's partner, even while angry.
A
statement of opinion need not be based upon
fact at all; an opinion is not claimed
as factual; it is
just an opinion, one person's perception
of what could be based upon information that you and I are not privy to.