Sentences with phrase «just as the concept»

In early 2006, just as the concept of cloud computing was gaining traction in tech circles, Amazon's cloud offering went live.

EG: That's a more difficult question because I really sort of reject the notion of trends, just as a concept.

Dimitri Kozyrev, Last One 3, 2010 Acrylic on canvas 84 x 72 inches March 10 — April 1, 2011 «Now, however, I maintain that just as the concept of the military avant - garde has been «lost,» because of changes in methods of warfare, the avant - garde in the contemporary art world, has also lost its edge.»

Just as the concept of «differentiation» — the notion that some countries should contribute more money and climate action than others — was enshrined in the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) over 20 years ago and still haunts some countries today, there's an anxiety now that codifying REDD + in a similar manner will lead to similar implications far down the road.

«Just as the concept of a «hiatus» or «pause» began to dominate the discourse in our field because of factors external to the science itself (i.e. the politically - motivated insistence by climate change deniers and fossil - fueled politicians that there was a «pause» or «hiatus» in warming), so too are some authors caught up in a «Groundhog Day» exercise of writing repeated articles about how there wasn't a pause.»

I started getting recruited by all of the top - producing teams in my area, just as the concept of real estate teams was taking off.

Not exact matches

What started as a niche concept just a few years ago has become a large - scale and viable way for people to invest directly in promising ideas, which creates a new pool of funding while allowing small investors to reap the financial rewards of contributing to successful ventures.

The concept of AR is just as simple, believe it or not.

At this point, Dyson decided to go and work at his father's enterprise, and over the course of two years, he worked on a project from concept to just before manufacture - but it never went into production, because, as Dyson remembers it, it was too contemporary for the time (and it may be still be so today, he adds).

Concepts such as creativity, prototyping, and turning ideas into action pertain to many facets of growing a company, not just the visual or functional thinking commonly placed under the «design» label.

Funny enough, Slack actually originated from an old gaming chat room concept, and as a former gamer I will tell you that chat rooms online are just as personal as anything else.

When you reframe the concept of risk to include these types of actions, women take just as many risks as men.

This is a concept that most commonly applies to fiction writers rather than marketers, but it's just as important.

Darin Kingston of d.light, whose profitable solar - powered LED lanterns simultaneously address poverty, education, air pollution / toxic fumes / health risks, energy savings, carbon footprint, and more Janine Benyus, biomimicry pioneer who finds models in the natural world for everything from extracting water from fog (as a desert beetle does) to construction materials (spider silk) to designing flood - resistant buildings by studying anthills in India's monsoon climate, and shows what's possible when you invite the planet to join your design thinking team Dean Cycon, whose coffee company has not only exclusively sold organic fairly traded gourmet coffee and cocoa beans since its founding in 1993, but has funded dozens of village - led community development projects in the lands where he sources his beans John Kremer, whose concept of exponential growth through «biological marketing,» just as a single kernel of corn grows into a plant bearing thousands of new kernels, could completely change your business strategy Amory Lovins of the Rocky Mountain Institute, who built a near - net - zero - energy luxury home back in 1983, and has developed a scientific, economically viable plan to get the entire economy off oil, coal, and nuclear and onto renewables — while keeping and even improving our high standard of living

I know for a fact that most of these folks started out just like everybody else... as first - timers who were new to the whole concept of retiring abroad and wanted to take that first important step in a supportive atmosphere.

And traders who are aware of the different concepts largely are not aware that you can pull off trend trading and range trading in foreign currency exchange (forex) just as you can stocks.

Other corporate managers - not to mention many of today's investors - might benefit from apply just such a «backwards» process in their own thinking» Marathon Asset Management «Charlie Munger is famous for the pioneering concept of inverting as an investor, of thinking backwards to find one's way to the beginning of an idea or concept.

Maybe if you can start to try to wrap your head around that concept... then you have just started to understand that science will NEVER figure that out and there is no evolutionary process that will ever make us understand... so you are left with only one inference (as you guys like to say)... it is GOD

Just as an example, GRAVITY or at least our system of laws, rules, concepts, and equations explaining it is a THEORY.

Partly it is a celebration of power for its own sake: the gleeful freedom of the builders of Babel rising again as they sense that God is just a concept, and one that hinders their autonomy.

Concepts such as «state» and «society» and «government» have no existence save as physically exemplified in the acts of self - responsible individuals, just as blame, guilt, responsibility etc. are matters taking place inside human beings singly and nowhere else.

But especially because you obviously have no concept of what «blasphemy» is... The fellow you judged didn't take your Jesus» name in vain, he just used the name as part of his conversation while talking about the mythological figure himself...

As for beauty, love, justice, virtue, will, and reason, these are all just terms used to describe concepts, and all of them are subjective.

In place of accepting a basic ontological dualism between «act» and «potency» as distinct metaphysical principles at the root of being, he suggests that for material existence the concepts of «act» and «potency» or «matter» and «form» can be seen as two aspects of just one single complex of contingency.

The concept of once saved always saved takes a bit to get your head around but Gods grace is greater than our sin and greater than our good works it just takes faith in Jesus Christ to recieve Gods grace.In saying that to continue to sin as a christian is like playing with fire you will be burnt.Paul talks of the sexual immorality in corinthian church of the son and father that were sleeping with the same wife they were excommunicated from the church the members were not allowed to even eat with them until they repented.There are consequences for our actions.The other side to this is that if you continue to sin as a christian you are not walking by faith but walking by the flesh and are really backsliding.In the backslidden state you also become powerless and open to attack by satan as long as we walk in the flesh he can influence us to get worse not better.If we are walking in Christ satan may still try to tempt us but we are empowered by the holy spirit and overcome him and our faith increases.Both are saved by grace but one is powerless because of sin versus saved but an overcomer having been set free from sin i think this is what Paul was trying to explain.It is better to be an overcomer than overcome by sin.brentnz

In such cases, women are left with the choice to adopt a Machiavellian concept of feminism, where as long as we achieve our personal end goals, the damage we do to ourselves and to others is just collateral.

As far as I can tell, they just see it as an outstanding problem that is not as important as the other concepts in their belief systeAs far as I can tell, they just see it as an outstanding problem that is not as important as the other concepts in their belief systeas I can tell, they just see it as an outstanding problem that is not as important as the other concepts in their belief systeas an outstanding problem that is not as important as the other concepts in their belief systeas important as the other concepts in their belief systeas the other concepts in their belief system.

Since Aristotle and Whitehead are at one in distancing themselves critically from entity understood as substrate, since they both have in mind the existence of a «self» as the decisive characteristic of entity, and since moreover they both turn in the direction of organic unities and not of «things,» it becomes all the more urgent to ask just how the Whiteheadian concept of an «actual entity» is related to the Aristotelian concept of «entity.»

To cite just one example, it is difficult to see how this synthesis, relying as it does upon a basically Aristotelian concept of nature or form as a static unchanging reality, can accommodate the discoveries of modern science.

One way of expressing the new concepts is to say that God employs the sacraments as a means of giving himself to us just as he uses preaching.

But insofar as in this boundary - concept becoming is thought of as lacking all determination (although in the concrete there exists only a determinate becoming), it is, in its relation to form, just as radically to be thought of as potency, as Aristotelian «primary matter.»

@ Theo — it amazing me that intelligent people, such as you, fail or refuse to see just how monstrous that concept is.

As a matter of fact, one can wonder why Whitehead would conclude a discussion obviously meant to present a solution to evil with a stern restatement of the concept of evil he just transcended.

I can accept the notion that a God just exist, and if those want to play on that concept we can take it even further and say why could God not have come out of a Big Bang as well.

Philosophy is great when dealing with abstract, human concepts (beacuse it's process is based around the human as the standard) but without some way to test philosophical treaties, you are just doing thought experiments which may or may not have any bearing on events in the «real» world.

Whatever truth there may be in the assertion that man makes God in his own image, the affirmation of faith carries with it a clear distinction between the concept of God (which indeed is man - made, just as all human concepts are man - made) and God himself.

Also, just to add, with the example for ants and elephants... animals do not have the same concept of morality as humans do.

Fine but if you're going to teach creationism alongside evolution, then it must be presented as «just an idea... just a concept that ancient civilizations with no scientific background developed in a one - answer - fits - all, fill - in - the - gaps manner.

Hausman: That is the thing that just occurred to me as you were talking about fluid concepts.

The conception of sovereignty as moral responsibility in the classic just war tradition contrasts importantly with the morally sterile concept of sovereignty in the Westphalian system.

The widespread nature of this judgment is likely one of the reasons this «presumption against war» concept, original to the United States Catholic bishops, has since 1983 become more broadly accepted as descriptive of the just war idea.

infinity is the concept that is hardest to grasp, just stop thinking of everything else and think about infinity.if your mind isn't totally blown in 15 seconds start thinking of infinity backwards.think about the very edge of space and time as far as we can sense it and then realize that this nowhere even close to the tip of the iceberg.

Woe to you oh person who can not accept the world as an open concept but rather one of malice and conformity, I feel saddened for you that you are unwilling to be open to other options yourself just because your too hard headed to accept mistakes.

The atom is not just inaccessible to direct observation and unimaginable in terms of sensory qualities; it can not even be described coherently in terms of classical concepts such as space, time and causality.

As people come to realize that the concept of «God» is just an ancient human fabrication «spiritual but not religious» seems to be a rational way to deal with this dichotomy.

Put yourself in the place of a creationist who has been silenced by that logic, and you may feel like a criminal defendant who has just been told that the law does not recognize so absurd a concept as «innocence.»

As to when this idea that people weren't actually JUST heterosexual is a little more difficult to point to because same - sex relationships are all over ancient documents but it appears the concept came about circa - 1700s and the actual word homosexual came out a century and a half later.

«Spiritual but not religious» is just something people call themselves when they don't really believe in God or anything spiritual, but are open to the concept, as long as it doesn't include the commitment and sacrifice associated with organized religion.

Thus, for all he shows to the contrary, the only thing in our concept of human knowledge that derives from our direct intuition of God is the idea of totality or all - inclusiveness, just as he himself allows that we can very well experience «the inclusive something» without experiencing it as «an inclusive experience» (1948, 39f.).

Granted that psychicalism as a metaphysical position does indeed imply that at least some psychical concepts are truly analogical in their application to God, it is just as clear that psychicalism itself can be established as true only if at least some psychical terms are known to express theological analogies.