Sentences with phrase «just assertions»

Christine Milne makes some interesting assertions about 25 % cuts not being much more expensive than 5 % cuts, and how 40 + % is for the best if you're ultimately going for carbon neutrality, and I hope that her Senate inquiry produces some support for these assertions, or at least some relevant data, but for now they're just assertions.

Please provide proof of source for the statements of the two, not just assertions from the «skeptic» rumour kitchen.

Just assertions without evidence.

Just assertions without proof!

No proof, just assertions.

You need to change your name to «Just assertions and polemic idiocy».

This goes back to my original point that religion can not be verified and are just assertions with no verification... which is what makes them dangerous.

I suspect this 95 % figure is just another assertion without foundation.

Catholic truth as you call it is not at all truth, just an assertion by the church it is right and others are wrong..

A person can not reject what doesn't exist, just the assertion that it does exist despite all facts to the contrary.

Interesting point, but you make a huge sweeping generalization about indies and the big 5 without any supporting evidence, just an assertion.

No mearsurements, no evidence — just assertion after assertion.

The witch hunt against Lloyd, Cooper et - al is just an assertion of their power — it has no rational basis.

It's not just my assertion — but I'm not the one issuing a glossy, highly distributed report.

This is just an assertion.

Or is it just an assertion on your part?

Not exact matches

As for her assertion that newcomers should find the process rewarding enough to brave an intimidating tableau of wires and capacitors and diodes, well, just think about how some people claim to love assembling IKEA furniture: the careful laying out of the parts, painstaking examination of instructions, a few false starts and, ultimately, the satisfaction of things slotting into place as the final product takes shape.

By contrast, Trump offered this assertion that just floated in its own odor: «When Mexico sends its people, they're not sending their best.

Attorneys for McClendon's estate said the creditors» assertion that the estate was insolvent was «just incorrect.»

Be it with nonsensical assertions or statements (which either have zero basis in fact or reality, or are just a one - dimensional, self - promotional view on things), or random what - about ism arguments (one response to the launch of a social enterprise incubator in Dubai was essentially, «What about Yemen?»)

The U.S. Federal Trade Commission and Reebok settled a dispute this week revolving around Reebok's assertions that certain of its shoe models tones and strengthens muscles just by walking in them.

«And in example after example, radical notion after radical notion, Jay and Shel don't just make the assertion about something that challenges everything we thought we knew about marketing — they give readers chapter - and - verse examples that make the case for one simple concept after another that... well, could just revolutionize everything.

It does pose the question, though, that if your assertion is right, that aversion to change is so high that we're just never going to get a shot on goal, then we might be stuck.

Meanwhile, our best response to Wall Street's evidence - free assertions about profit margins is to quote W. Edwards Deming: «Without data, you're just another person with an opinion.»

These actions, along with the board's assertion of «substantial liquidity» just months before the collapse and a progressive dividend policy (apparently at the expense of employees» pension fund contributions), have prompted questions on whether oversight failures relate to coziness with management, or simply competence.

That perhaps lends credence to critics» assertions that the petro is just a virtual barrel of oil, an attempt by the Maduro government to raise billions of dollars in foreign exchange in order to keep the government in operation without having to do the actual hard work of drilling for and shipping oil.

It is just an empty theological assertion and is indicative of dependency.

It's just another baseless assertion.

The assertion that «Mormonism is the most nonexclusive religion in the Christian world» is just an outright lie; they simply postpone the requirement that you're a Christian until after you die.

It's cute though you keep calling me a liar that makes baseless assertion, it's really just adorable.

He's just refuting the ridiculous assertions by some creationists to refute clear evidence of evolutionary theory, or suggest that the Earth is only 6,000 years old.

You're still just making assertion after assertion, without giving anything.

But to get to primary assertion of if not be based on Christian principles — read the Constitution & study Christianity (because judging by your words, you don't know it) and if you can't see the correlation then you just don't want to.

Don't ya think a just God should have put His foot down in that??? I think your assertion here is that an all - powerful God can not be all - powerful if He has emotions.

you going to quote those positions as well or are you just going to quote mine to support you unfounded assertions?

In these days of rival grand theories» superstrings, the inflationary model, et al.» competing on the front pages of the Wall Street Journal for the status of last word on the ultimate, Davies» book might appear to be just another technician's confident assertion that science will soon have all the answers.

Seems like he's just tossing out random idiotic assertions at this point.

If you can not say «Yes», then you are not a Christian, and you have the right to your assertions just as Nestorius had.

Contrary to the assertion thrown at those of us who reject biblical inerrancy and / or infallibility, we don't just go around throwing out the parts we don't like.

But it is just this radical self - assertion which makes such an understanding impossible.

And in the absence of that, it is a matter of choice just how determinative the connectedness must be in comparison with other relations and influences to warrant the assertion of personal identity.

If your point was to demonstrate that just about any unsubstantiated assertion about the true essence of reality is as good as any other (e.g. any religion as yet developed), then well done!

You are just committing the fallacy of Non Sequitur and the fallacy of Proof By Assertion.

So don't just generally like you have some sort of research on what is simply an opinionated assertion.

It's an unfortunate quirk of human character that we tend to associate an entire group with the assertions of just a few from among them.

This is not an easy question to answer because it is not clear (in spite of Neville's contrary assertion) that we really can conceive of alternative sets of a priori truths and because it is not clear how any evidence could be adduced to show that any such truths report what is the case and not just what our nature determines must seem to be the case for us.

It just takes the honest admission that «There are thing the human race doesn't know and can't explain yet,» and rather responding with «But we're working hard to figure out the things we don't know,» comes up with a lot of baseless, convoluted, assertions of knowledge.

Your assertion that non-believers should just keep away from criticising things that they consider harmful to the world, is as one - sided as it gets.

I'll respond to just two of your assertions and then leave it at that.

Whatever truth there may be in the assertion that man makes God in his own image, the affirmation of faith carries with it a clear distinction between the concept of God (which indeed is man - made, just as all human concepts are man - made) and God himself.