Sentences with phrase «just change the theory»

Not exact matches

Many people have theories why Niantic made these changes — some think the game's three - step tracker had a negative impact on the «Pokémon GO» servers, so they shut down the feature until they could fix the problem — but most people are frustrated not just because this crucial feature was removed, but because Niantic hasn't given any kind of official explanation, and has done nothing to calm worried fans.

If it's all just alternate explanations that work with the evidence, I would much prefer people change their theory to meet the facts (as the Dalai Lama, for instance, recommends) than keep going with some simplistic idea of «faith».

You said, «But your theory requires that we believe in two coincidences: first, that it just happens that their life changes, and second, that is just happens to occur right after the person asks God for help.»

One might say that just as nuclear war has made of the whole planet a potential battlefield, thus raising new questions about war itself, so, too, has modern advertising made of the whole planet an actual constant marketplace, thus provoking radical changes in the practice and theory of human intercourse.

Because of the cultural changes of modernity, however, the just war tradition has been carried, developed, and applied not as a single cultural consensus but as distinct streams in Catholic canon law and theology, Protestant religious thought, secular philosophy, international law, military theory and practice, and the experience of statecraft.

I know that i have prayed and things changed for the good and i have learned that faith requires a courage that atheist just don't have, so now you atheist can start your shallow explanations about how you can think for yourselves and your laughable big bang theories and your evolved from monkeys nonsense and i'll just stay with truth.

The change in Hinduism is not just in theory but in practice.

Although he initially rejects physicalism because he thinks that a human person is not just an organism and mental changes are not simply physical changes, he concludes «physicalism is the most reasonable theory about the nature of human beings».

The American Christian debate about just war theory is in a sense nothing other than a debate about America's role in the world, a debate little changed since, say, 1968.

There is a determined attempt to impose gender theories in many countries — with attempts to change language or to castigate parents for bringing up children as male or female, as if the structures of language and grammar bore no necessary relation to human biology and were just a social construct of a patriarchal or «straight» society — and forgetting that «non-binary» language is itself a construct and an attempt to ideologically cleanse language to suit a particular theory.

I have slightly improved the thrust of this quotation: Whitehead actually (somewhat embarrassingly) claims that the «struggle for existence gives no hint why there should be cities» even though Hobbes» social theory provides just such an account, illustrating that cultural change and even transformation per se has necessarily little to do with the issue of evolution.

Furthermore, the radical changes that the nuclear age has brought to the phenomenon of war make it impossible to weigh means against ends in the way required by just - war theory.

The difficulty that stems from just assembling therapeutic components from different sources is that this approach usually produces a kind of hash eclecticism — a theory from here, a technique from there — with no integrating structure, no internally consistent core of assumptions about the nature, process, and goals of therapeutic change.

Maybe i should have just used the word wob instead of the BSM seeing as it is they whom have used the change in Wenger theory (money helps ya know?)

The theory of dangerous climate change is based not just on carbon dioxide warming but on positive and negative feedback effects from water vapor and phenomena such as clouds and airborne aerosols from coal burning.

Will Gray is of course disputing the «changes in solar radiation» theory of recent warming just as much as he is disputing the CO2 explanation.

In fact, man - made climate - change - global - warming * is * just a theory, and one that has been disproved by climate realists, but is still successfully promoted by climate alarmists.

At the point you see the title character change the length and color of her hair and add make - up just by thinking about it, you know this is a film not even trying to adhere to any legitimate scientific theory.

Before this year I was always really intimidated by research, policy, and evaluation — I had never heard of a «theory of change» before — and thought of myself as a small scale, community level «programming» person, believing that those other things just weren't for me.

It's not just a theory and it's not meant as an excuse - it's a fact that must be dealt with if anything is going to change for these kids.

If you're going to change it, if you're going to implement Common Core and replace CAPT with SBAC, explain it to us, just like you'd explain Einstein's theory of general relativity, Shakespeare's iambic pentameter and the four major language families of Burma.

This is a possibility and would explain why it only appears to be the ratio at with MRs transfer to BA that's changing and not any other program — but I don't know when Amex's contract with British Airways is due for re-negotiaiton so this is just a theory.

I'm just still waiting for the inevitable theory that NOA made Square Enix do this even though this was already changed in the JPN release to keep a CERO A rating and has more to do with CERO than Nintendo.

- the team has been adding weapons one by one because they want the same amount of attention for each weapon - the team learned that when they added two new weapons at once, one would end up getting overshadowed by the other - there were more new stages than returning stages because bringing back old stages would have little surprise - since they want to satisfy both new and returning players, they changed the order of stage additions - there weren't any major direction changes in balancing from Splatoon 1 - there have been more pattern combinations between weapons and stages, so there was more involved to balance them all - matchmaking is handled by getting 8 players with similar rank points, and then they're split by weapons - the rank point gap between S + players is bigger than ordinary players - only about one in 1,000 active players are in the S +40 to S +50 region in Ranked Battles - there's even less than one in 10 players that reach S +, while 80 % of the overall player base are in A or less - about 90 % of S + ranked players are within a + / -150 hidden ranked power range - rock was the popular genre in Splatoon, so they tried changing it for the sequel - they prioritized making good background music first before forming the band to play that music - the design team would make the CD jacket - like artwork afterwards - due to this, the band members would often change; some getting added while some others removed - Off the Hook is an exception, as they first decided they would be a DJ and rapper along with their visuals first - Off the Hook's song came afterwards - In Splatoon street fashion was the trend, but in Splatoon 2 they tried adding more uniqueness - the aim was to add Flow with ethnic clothing and Jelfonzo with high fashion - all Jellyfish in this world are born by splitting, which means Jelfonzo was born by splitting from Jelonzo - Jellyfish are like a hive mind - when they hold a wedding ceremony, they're just simply holding the ceremony - Jelonzo and Jelfonzo start gaining their own consciences so they can speak - Flow used her working holiday to go on a trip before reaching Inkopolis Square - during the trip, she met the owner of Headspace - the owner liked her, so she got hired to work there - Bisk has a unique way of speaking: anastrophe - the team tried to express him as an adult man - they made him into a giant spider crab because they wanted someone with high posture - he came from a cold country and broke up with his girlfriend to join a band - just like Flow, he became attracted to squids - Crusty Sean finally has his own shop, but he opened it because he's someone who follows the current trends - one of the trends happens to be people opening their own shops - drink tickets aren't stacked, but the probability is higher than a single brand - the music in Inkopolis Square changes depending on the player's location - sounds contribute to creating atmosphere in the location - the song at front of Grizzco Industries had an atmosphere that feels like some smell can radiate from the game screen - as for Salmon Run, they imagined it as a Japanese restaurant outside Japan that is not run by a Japanese person - each time the player moves between the shops, the game uses an arrange shift that shows the personality of each inhabitant - the arrangement in Shella Fresh is related to Bisk's guitar and mystery files that describe his past - with the Squid Sisters moved to Hero Mode, Off the Hook was put in charge in guiding battles and festivals - Bomb Rush Blush has an orchestra «because it would sound like the final boss» - the team wanted to express the feel of the story's real culprit with this music - the probability of each event occurring in Salmon Run is different - there are no specific requirements, meaning they're picked randomly - this means it's possible for fog to appear three times in a row - the Salmon have different appearances based on the environment they're raised in - if the environment is harsher, they would become large salmon - Steelheads and Maws have big bodies, while Scrappers and Steel Eels have high intelligence - Salmons basically wield kitchenware, but everybody else has a virtue in fighting to actually cook the Salmons - Grill is the ultimate form of this - when Salmons are fighting to the death, they can feel the same sense of unity - they would be one with the world if they were eaten by other creatures, and they also fight for the pride of their race - MakoMart is based on a large supermarket in America - the update also took place on Black Friday in America, which was why Squids are buying a lot of things in the trailer - Arowana Mall looks like it has more passages because there are changes in tenants and also renovation work - Walleye Warehouse has no changes at all, because the team wanted to have at least one map that stayed intact - the only thing different in this map is the graffiti, which is based on the winner of Famitsu's Squid Fashion Contest - all members in the band Ink Theory graduated from music university - they are well - educated girls who also do aggressive things - the band members wearing neckties are respecting the Hightide Era from the prequel - the team will continue adding weapons and stages for a year, and Splatfests for two years - the team will also continue to make more updates including balancing

Levels are also timed so when you are out of time your ball changes into an erratic energy orb that acts like an insane ball on a string so in theory you can guide it to destroy those last few blocks, in practice it's hard to control and just creates frustration.

«As explained by mathematician William L. Paschke, Chaos Theory posits that, «if you do the same simple thing over and over, beautiful patterns can emerge, and, more importantly, sometimes if you change the starting point by just a tiny little bit, you can get a completely different - looking pattern.»

, set by a robust scientific theory of some sort, regarding the degree of change that we humans could bring about (given positive feedbacks) if we just continue «business as usual» for a long period of time.

G&T managed to get their work out there; publishing it in Nature or Science would not have changed the fact that they're arguments just don't hold any water (they didn't do any new science, they just took what was already known, and then tried to use that to argue against what is already known — a search for logical inconsistency, which might have been worthwhile if they'd known what they were doing and if they'd gone after contrarian «theory»)-- unless it were edited, removing all the errors and non-sequitors, after which it would be no different than a physics book such as the kind a climate scientist would use...

There might be value in a more generic piece focusing on this kind of tension, which is going to be with us for some time — the slow steady responses predicted by current models, the concern that some observations of faster and bigger changes might actually be the greenhouse gas - forced signal and not just internal variability, the patience required before new observations and better theories / models sort things out.

The ice isn't just good propagand a, it's a hard nosed fact that makes fooling around with AC theories of climate change moot.

* There is too much conflicting evidence about climate change to know whether it is actually happening * Current climate change is part of a pattern that has been going on for millions of years * Climate change is just a natural fluctuation in Earth's temperatures * Even if we do experience some consequences from climate change, we will be able to cope with them * The effects of climate change are likely to be catastrophic * The evidence for climate change is unreliable * There are a lot of very different theories about climate change and little agreement about which is right * Scientists have in the past changed their results to make climate change appear worse than it is * Scientists have hidden research that shows climate change is not serious * Climate change is a scam * Social / behavioural scepticism measures * Climate change is so complicated, that there is very little politicians can do about it * There is no point in me doing anything about climate change because no - one else is * The actions of a single person doesn't make any difference in tackling climate change * People are too selfish to do anything about climate change * Not much will be done about climate change, because it is not in human nature to respond to problems that won't happen for many years * It is already too late to do anything about climate change * The media is often too alarmist about climate change * Environmentalists do their best to emphasise the worst possible effects of climate change * Climate change has now become a bit of an outdated issue * Whether it is important or not, on a day - to - day basis I am bored of hearing about climate change

«Climate change is just a theory.»

Instead they offer a theory that climate change probably derives predominantly from natural ocean - atmosphere oscillations and / or by natural solar variations (irradiation and cosmic ray flux) and / or by natural cloud cover variations and / or the Milankovitch Effect, i.e. it is probably predominantly just natural.

Are the world's ice caps melting because of climate change, or are the reports just a lot of scare mongering by the advocates of the global warming theory?

Scientists: «Loud Divergence Between Sea Level Reality And Climate Change Theory» Global Sea Level «Acceleration» Just 0.002 mm / year ² According to peer - reviewed, «consensus» climate science, anthropogenic CO2 emissions are the cause of Arctic sea ice decline.

The climate change or global warming hypothesis is just that... a hypothesis and not a theory, it can never be lifted above a hypothesis because it can't be shown in any type of true lab experiment as repeatable, not once and surely not twice.

So many billions of dollars changing hands over a theory, really just a theory which looks more like a religion since you can't oppose it without retribution.

To point out just a couple of things: — oceans warming slower (or cooling slower) than lands on long - time trends is absolutely normal, because water is more difficult both to warm or to cool (I mean, we require both a bigger heat flow and more time); at the contrary, I see as a non-sense theory (made by some serrist, but don't know who) that oceans are storing up heat, and that suddenly they will release such heat as a positive feedback: or the water warms than no heat can be considered ad «stored» (we have no phase change inside oceans, so no latent heat) or oceans begin to release heat but in the same time they have to cool (because they are losing heat); so, I don't feel strange that in last years land temperatures for some series (NCDC and GISS) can be heating up while oceans are slightly cooling, but I feel strange that they are heating up so much to reverse global trend from slightly negative / stable to slightly positive; but, in the end, all this is not an evidence that lands» warming is led by UHI (but, this effect, I would not exclude it from having a small part in temperature trends for some regional area, but just small); both because, as writtend, it is normal to have waters warming slower than lands, and because lands» temperatures are often measured in a not so precise way (despite they continue to give us a global uncertainity in TT values which is barely the instrumental's one)-- but, to point out, HadCRU and MSU of last years (I mean always 2002 - 2006) follow much better waters» temperatures trend; — metropolis and larger cities temperature trends actually show an increase in UHI effect, but I think the sites are few, and the covered area is very small worldwide, so the global effect is very poor (but it still can be sensible for regional effects); but I would not run out a small warming trend for airport measurements due mainly to three things: increasing jet planes traffic, enlarging airports (then more buildings and more asphalt — if you follow motor sports, or simply live in a town / city, you will know how easy they get very warmer than air during day, and how much it can slow night - time cooling) and overall having airports nearer to cities (if not becoming an area inside the city after some decade of hurban growth, e.g. Milan - Linate); — I found no point about UHI in towns and villages; you will tell me they are not large cities; but, in comparison with 20-40-60 years ago when they were «countryside», many small towns and villages have become part of larger hurban areas (at least in Europe and Asia) so examining just larger cities would not be enough in my opinion to get a full view of UHI effect (still remembering that it has a small global effect: we can say many matters are due to UHI instead of GW, maybe even that a small part of measured GW is due to UHI, and that GW measurements are not so precise to make us able to make good analisyses and predictions, but not that GW is due to UHI).

Andrew Marr: What's interesting — I mean, so, just to be absolutely clear for all those listening, um, of all those theories about the imminent end of the Earth, and the Earth's going to change on its axis and rotate in a different direction — there is no scientific evidence for any of this, as far as you're concerned, absolutely none.

It's a bit of a stretch to argue that this mysterious change in climate just happened to come along exactly when theory predicted AGW would start to kick in.

Climate change is such a compellingly entertaining theory that were allowed to pretend that they were just discussing using a legitimate statistical method to rectify anomalous data.

That's the thing with the whole «end of the world climate change warming armageddon thing»... it's just someone's wacky theory with not a skerrick of fact or observable anything to support it.

It just goes to show that supporters of AGW will change their theory to support the facts.

Meteor impact is just one of a number of theories that led to extinction of the dinosaurs, including cataclysmic volcanic eruptions, rapid climate change, or multiple huge tsunamis.

They've been disingenuous, cried conspiracy theory, feigned ignorance, and held egregiously falsely balanced hearings, all to downplay just how serious a threat climate change is.

And about refuting planetary influences: for many «theories» it suffices to point out that the Sun is in free fall and therefore does not feel any effects from its velocity or acceleration, just as a man in an elevator with a broken cable accelerates towards his fate without [on the way] feeling anything [except that he is weightless] and the astronaut in orbit also in free fall being weightless and not feeling his speed or acceleration [he changes direction all the time, hence accelerates constantly].

They use issues like Mann not how Dr. Curry does (questioning the process) but how Climate Change is just a big conspiracy theory.

If any of the religious - zealot scaremongers could do that, the facts would be plainly clear and stand on their own, and the «experts» wouldn't be developing «Information Task Forces» and other propaganda gimmicks to convince the majority of people (yes, the majority) that the theory is correct, that «climate change» is killing us all, that we can do something about it, but, alas the majority of us are just too dumb to understand it.

By establishing another office with international authority to research and act on climate change, is that just giving too much credence to a «theory» that Barrasso is hoping will go away?

Just to cite a recent story, Japan's leading scientific advisory body on climate change has reversed their position on the issue and said the theory of AGW is akin to astrology.