Sentences with phrase «just claim i did»

You said, «I am sure LinCA and Just Claims don't care how Catholics are maligned and anything a Catholic says is just stupid anyway.»

I am sure LinCA and Just Claims don't care how Catholics are maligned and anything a Catholic says is just stupid anyway.

And the people that believe in God, also are open to evolution, and know more about science then the people that just claim they do.

You humans just claim I did to sell more copies.

They just claimed they did.

Not exact matches

Any «expert» claiming there is something unusual about this or that it has something to do with the quality of cars that come off a production line is either very confused or just completely wrong.»

That's a flexibility, and autonomy, that companies in the on - demand economy just don't offer to less - skilled workers — no matter what they claim.

And our government is claiming that it doesn't have enough money for infrastructure or for healthcare or for police or for education and at the same time, there's just huge amounts of tax avoidance and tax evasion going on through this secrecy world.

Claims like, «That's just how business is done over there,» and «No one really gets hurt,» or «We've always done it that way,» or «That's the only way we'll make our sales targets,» are often false and seldom provide cogent support for the moral conclusions they are intended to support.

There are roughly a million books that claim to help you do just that, from classics of productivity and persuasion, to a whole industry of «get more done» type manuals.

Planning your weekends may sound too Type A at first, but Vanderkam claims thinking ahead doesn't just push you toward more active (and therefore more rejuvenating) pursuits.

Fortune pointed to the quarterly report Tesla had filed just three days after the crash, warning that»... we face inherent risk of exposure to claims in the event our vehicles do not perform as expected resulting in personal injury or death,» and specifically calling out Autopilot as a technology that could result in such claims and materially affect financial performance.

Unilever, for example, filed a suit against Hampton Creek last year claiming false advertising and unfair competition because Hampton Creek's Just Mayo doesn't contain eggs — a requirement under the current standard of identity for mayonnaise.

In a similar vein, earlier this year the U.S. Food and Drug Administration sent a warning letter claiming that the Just Mayo products are «misbranded» because they do not meet the definition and standard of identity for mayonnaise.

The Vancouver, Canada - based company's fall from grace began with the embarrassing revelation that some of its pants were see through and the non mea culpa of founder and chairman Chip Wilson, where he claimed in November that «some women's bodies just don't actually work» for the clothing.

This doesn't just fall foul of the technicalities of net neutrality, but of the core principle itself — generally, while operators claim they want to improve their customers» experience, they also want to use their gatekeeper role to demand a slice of the action from the big ad networks.

And my personal favorite — the all too familiar claim of how some folks stay at home just so they can finally get some work done.

The company claims it can optimize ads to ensure they appear when the weather conditions are just right, and charge a premium to do so.

Rather than assuming suppliers are telling the truth or being ambivalent over the difficulty of verifying claims, product producers and suppliers would do well to acknowledge just how limited their quality - control reach really is.

And it's not just Deresiewicz who claims that Gen Y doesn't want to change the world so much as sell its inhabitants more stuff (or maybe, just maybe, change the world by selling more stuff).

There are various theories as to why the presidential candidate may not want people to see his tax returns — maybe he doesn't donate to charity as much as he says he does; maybe he's not as wealthy as he claims; and maybe he just doesn't pay taxes — something we saw in his tax returns from the 1970s.

It claims that because Hampton Creek's Just Mayo product doesn't contain any eggs, it shouldn't be called or marketed as mayo or mayonnaise.

Just a few days ago, President Donald Trump claimed he passed on being Time's «Person of the Year» because he didn't want to agree to an interview and photoshoot.

Pretty much everyone took the move as meaning just that, but Xi has now claimed he is «personally opposed» to life - long rule, and the term - limit removal was more about aligning the post of presidency with that of top posts in the Communist Party, which Xi also holds, and which don't come with term limits.

Making an effort to claim what's already yours, doing some advertising and taking a hard look at post-click will not just increase your image, it will increase your profit margin, too.

But instead of just repeating his claim that he didn't collude with Russia, Trump is now targeting the man leading the probe.

But the money, paid just before the 2016 election to stifle her claims of an affair, «had nothing to do with the campaign,» the president tweeted.

Uber as the defense doesn't have to prove anything, just cast enough doubt on Waymo's claims.

I don't remember the guy at Taco Bell asking to hold on to my cash for a week, just to confirm that no one claims I robbed them prior to lunchtime.

Let me also tackle the article's claim that most investors will just do it themselves.

For one, you claim to have knowledge what the financial contortion is doing an you have this conspiracy theory that you clearly just repeated from cultists on reddit.

Just don't pay attention to those that make the claim that they know for sure exactly where the current valuations will take the markets.

Shortly thereafter, Daniels added a complaint in her lawsuit against Cohen, alleging defamation when on February 13 he stated in reference to claims of an affair that, «Just because something isn't true doesn't mean it can't cause you harm or damage,» implying that Daniels is lying about the affair.

I don't need big rural coverage (contrary to what you claimed, many don't), I don't want a new phone, I don't care about updates, I just want a basic phone service at the best price with reasonable reliability in the burbs near Seattle.

If you claim allowances you're not entitled to, you double - claim allowances with two employers or you just don't have enough tax withheld, it will cost you at tax time.

But when deciding how many allowances to claim, don't just think about what will give you a bigger paycheck.

I know that some claim, as they do in every election, that I and other union leaders are «telling members how to vote» and that's just the wrong thing to do.

SCL claimed to be able to do a new type of political targeting that would be based on modeling individuals» personalities (rather than just demographic traits like age, race, or gender, as is traditional).

Though we don't expect it just yet, a jump in new claims to about 20 % above year - ago levels (currently implying about 320,000 weekly new claims) would be indicative of a shift from «oncoming» to «commenced» recession.

While claiming early can be a smart financial decision in certain situations — whether you're in poor health, have underage kids that could boost your payout or just need the cash — doing so does reduce your monthly benefit.

Romano — Viacoin developer and well - known crypto trader — claims the Hass bot he uses can make «0.26 BTC ($ 2K) a day by using 9 BTC for example just by using market inefficiencies» before adding that he doesn't use the market maker bot that comes with Hass and cautioning that it's «only for skilled traders».

robined posted: «Regrettably, I am in a profession where there are minimal barriers to entry and just about anyone (within reason) can claim to do what I do.

«This person told this unnamed person about what they hear this person saw, and so I wrote it down, but you won't know who I am either» just doesn't cut it, Chad when it comes to supernatural claims.

Or do you get to just make claims, have them proven wrong, backpedel and say thats not what you meant, then present a new idea you think science will never be able to prove only to be proven wrong almost before it's out of your mouth.

Just because proselytizers learned how to weave a few polysyllabic words into their claims, doesn't make them scientists.

Bobinator, if you think it's «silly» to be rational about true historic risk assessment and okay to escalate hatreds over some claimed «siege» that simply doesn't exist, you are considerably worse than just silly.

Why don't you just make a claim or tell me your point about Jesus and science?

But when people go around making statements and claims that their particular supernatural explaination is just as real as the car in the street, don't be surprised that people will call them on their claim.

So how do you go from that reasoning to «Since it wasn't accidental then it must have been this ancient male diety named (fill in blank depending on religion) who loves me and knows me and cares for me and wants me to perform rituals that have nothing to do with morality like prayer, not eating certain things, sabaath and many more just because he said so, even though we have no record of him saying anything, just records of humans who wrote things down that they claim he said, but I want to believe it all so badly I will base my beliefs on no other evidence than «it just can't be accident».

but 2 of 7 people on the planet don't just claim to know it, but to surrender to the God they say wrote it.