It's
just death and resurrection, over and over again, day after day, as God reaches down into our deepest graves and with the same power that raised Jesus from the dead wrests us from our pride, our apathy, our fear, our prejudice, our anger, our hurt, and our despair.
Not exact matches
I committed to rising
just before dawn each day to pray, which not only broke my night - owl habits but also turned my heart
and mind to the significance of the pre-dawn dark in the
death and resurrection cycle.
Most are
just enjoying a fun day with the family (a wonderful Christian practice),
and many others of us are remembering the
death and resurrection of Jesus Christ (the most important event in human history).
The Bible considers ALL Christians to be saints... not
just a select few... Peter called all the followers saints in letter to the churches in Asia minor... Paul refers to all Christians as well to be saints... not because of what we do... but because of who we are... we are set aside by God... thru Jesus
death and resurrection... those of us who have acceptd this are saints...
If a person must believe in the
death and resurrection of Jesus, do they have to believe that it was by the shedding of blood of Jesus on the cross that sins are forgiven, or can they
just believe that it was simply His
death that was sufficient?
Jesus said that in the new world, people will neither marry nor be given in marriage; having passed beyond
death into
resurrection, with no prospect of
death, there will be no need for reproduction
and hence we may assume no desire for it,
just as now as a 64 - year old I no longer have a desire to play rugby though there was a time when I lived for it.
However,
just like it says in 1 Peter chapter 3 where during the time between Jesus's
death and resurrection where he was preaching to the spirits who were in prison who once lived from days of Noah
and the flood, that they were actually not lost souls after all.
The phrase «Paschal Mystery» presumably means everything involved in our Lord's passing over from this world
and entering into his glory: his
death, the descent of his soul to Limbo, his preaching to the spirits who were in prison, the freeing of the
just souls, the
Resurrection, the Ascension
and perhaps also the sending of the Holy Spirit at Pentecost.
Paul implies that it is
just such experiences which have been made possible by the cataclysmic
death and resurrection of Christ
and which will be climaxed by that final renewal, the second coming.
The NT is the
death and resurrection of Christ, why He came to earth, His sole purpose for living... Now, this is obviously an extremely short description,
and while others could have been more literate in the description, I would suggest you go to any website for further clarification on why the NT was needed, prophesied,
and Who it was all about... That is
just a start... To be a «free - thinker» requires honest examination of both sides.
All of us in FG know that His
Resurrection,
and not
just His
Death, was necessary for our justification.
Just as Adam's
and Eve's limitations constitute one aspect of their humanity, the life,
death,
and resurrection of Christ provide a portrait of humanity that includes vulnerability, weakness,
and powerlessness.
Just as in the gospels the most important thing is the incarnation,
death and resurrection, while the how of the incarnation, the virgin birth, lies in the hinterland; so also in respect to the doctrine of Scripture, while inspiration is as clearly taught as the virgin birth, it lies rather in the hinterland.»
Through His
death and resurrection, Jesus announced loud
and clear that God is not angry at sin,
and that
just as sin,
death,
and the devil have no hold on God, they have no hold on us either.
The «
resurrection of Jesus» must not be understood as something which lessens the significance of the
death of Jesus,
and any interpretation which implies that the
death of Jesus was unreal, or only temporary, does
just this.
Sorry to tell ya, but the Jews succeded in the
death of Jesus... what I don't understand is your use of that as a basis for hating Jews... You reveal your complete ignorance fo salvation... such as without the
death and resurrection of Jesus -LCB- which ceretainly did happen as I am this day a witness of his
resurrection -RCB-, there woudl be no asis for the gentiles for salvation... you see his blood was shed for the atoning sacrifice for the sins of all the world not
just gentile but Jew as well..
The first thing to be emphasized here is that the very use of the idiom of
resurrection implies that the phenomenon of
death is real for the whole person
and not
just for his physical body.
If you ever doubt or wonder about Jesus» love for you,
just remember these two words which tell us so much about our own sin, the heart of Jesus,
and the complete forgiveness
and love offered to us through His
death and resurrection.
The history of Jesus, even as history, was of decisive importance for the tradition,
just because in the Preaching the life,
death,
and resurrection of Jesus were held to be the climax of all history, the coming of the Kingdom of God.
To give
just three examples, there would seem to be legitimate doubts about such passages as John the Baptist's recognition of Jesus as the Messiah, Jesus saying to Peter «on this rock I will build my church;»
and Jesus» very specific predictions of his
death and resurrection.
Just as Jesus» life
and teaching are the model or paradigm of the new age,
and the
resurrection its seal, every moment in history which partakes of the new age — that is, of the overthrowing of
death and the power of
death — is an eschatological event which ends the old world
and inaugurates a new one.
You could tell someone to believe in Jesus for everlasting life without ever mentioning sin, spiritual
death, a substitutionary atonement since these are
just fluff or evidences yet they might be a stumbling block so if you
just harp on eternal life isn't that neglecting the
death and resurrection.
In a recent book (After
Death: Life in God, SCM Press) I have argued that what has just been said is a proper «demythologizing» of traditional Christian talk about death, judgment, resurrection, and eternal
Death: Life in God, SCM Press) I have argued that what has
just been said is a proper «demythologizing» of traditional Christian talk about
death, judgment, resurrection, and eternal
death, judgment,
resurrection,
and eternal life.
If you read Carl Jung, you can come to understand the images of Jesus»
death and resurrection as iconic
and as archetypes, as stories that simply «had to be told» because the world, in a cultural sense,
just needed to give voice to this idea.
Other Christians, even if they are hesitant to affirm a physical
resurrection, will surely balk, if they take the New Testament seriously, at following Kübler - Ross's chatty recommendation that «it might be helpful if more people would talk about
death and dying as an intrinsic part of life,
just as they do not hesitate to mention when someone is expecting a new baby.»
Below this are other scriptures that tell of Jesus
and if you are interested
and do the research you will find that indeed Jesus life,
death and resurrection happened
just as foretold.
In that old Gospel, both forgiveness
and justification are the result of Christ's
death only,
and the
resurrection (along with the other parts of Jesus» life past
and future) are
just «extras.»
Fisher quotes David Tracy: «To affirm the belief in Jesus Christ is... to affirm the faith that in the ministry,
death and resurrection of Jesus the decisive token, manifestation, prolepsis of the future reign of God (
and, thereby, Messianic time) is already here in a proleptic form
and,
just as really, not yet here.»
It is
just that rather than seek to obey God, Jonah prefers
death and resurrection so that he can worship God in heaven.
(For some «
death» means physical
death, such that there is the hope of
resurrection and not
just an «intimation of immortality.»)
Jesus»
death and resurrection free us to acknowledge
just how culturally relative
and historically conditioned his teachings were.
The theological entailment of this is that the locus of revelation is not
just the event of Jesus Christ or the word about him or, on the other hand, human experience, but is rather the intersection of the New Testament kerygma with the universal archetype of
death and resurrection which underlies that fundamental human life rhythm of upset
and recovery (Susanne Langer)
and which generates comic narratives.
So
just because someone claimed to be John, the beloved disciple, recounting an eyewitness account of the life,
death,
and supernatural
resurrection of Jesus, should we take him at his word??
This installment includes pieces about the
death and rebirth of Dance Dance Revolution, the
resurrection of gorgeous vector arcade game Aztarac after its creator's
death,
and lots more, I'm
just back from my 3 - week long -LRB-!)
Of course, the story of the crucifixion,
death, burial,
and resurrection of Christ is the central theme for Christians, there are other traditions we include in our family celebrations that are
just that... family traditions.