Sentences with phrase «just follow your measurements»

The dressing ingredient list is a mile long but I just follow your measurements and it comes out perfect time after time.

Not exact matches

Just as Russell asked how could relations among phenomena not reflect relations among noumena, we can ask the following question: if a key feature of mass is continuity, then does this not imply some underlying substrate that must persist without change from measurement to measurement?

I just mixed it up and it's too thick for my beaters to keep beating and I had to press it into the corners of the bread pan... I followed the measurements and if I erred it was on a little too much egg and oil, etc, not flour.

I followed your recipe, really tried to get the measurements just right, but when I took the cake out of the oven — it was risen unevenly and had deep cracks all over.

Hi I just started week one and when.i entered all my recipes into my nutrition calculator I came up with 27 net carbs for day one but I followed everything to a t exact measurements for everything.

I think they will be amazing & perfect then ** I did use exact measurements and follow the recipe to perfection, so I didn't add extra almond or anything like that, just to clarify.

If you don't know what Blue Apron is, it is basically just a subscription service where you can order meals for the week and all of the ingredients come pre-packaged to the correct measurements and an easy to follow recipe card that includes pictures.

If you are a beginner cook or just like to follow the recipe, I hope the measurements are useful.

The measurements I've read online are 8 cups flour, 1 cup oil, but I really didn't have so much flour at home so I just followed the ratio and made a small batch.

Results from just forty - three days of data along with ground - based follow - up observations have identified five new transiting planets with measurements of their masses, radii, and orbital periods.

It lets schools follow students» progress closely, and it allows for measurement of how much students learn and grow over time, not just where they are in a single moment.

To point out just a couple of things: — oceans warming slower (or cooling slower) than lands on long - time trends is absolutely normal, because water is more difficult both to warm or to cool (I mean, we require both a bigger heat flow and more time); at the contrary, I see as a non-sense theory (made by some serrist, but don't know who) that oceans are storing up heat, and that suddenly they will release such heat as a positive feedback: or the water warms than no heat can be considered ad «stored» (we have no phase change inside oceans, so no latent heat) or oceans begin to release heat but in the same time they have to cool (because they are losing heat); so, I don't feel strange that in last years land temperatures for some series (NCDC and GISS) can be heating up while oceans are slightly cooling, but I feel strange that they are heating up so much to reverse global trend from slightly negative / stable to slightly positive; but, in the end, all this is not an evidence that lands» warming is led by UHI (but, this effect, I would not exclude it from having a small part in temperature trends for some regional area, but just small); both because, as writtend, it is normal to have waters warming slower than lands, and because lands» temperatures are often measured in a not so precise way (despite they continue to give us a global uncertainity in TT values which is barely the instrumental's one)-- but, to point out, HadCRU and MSU of last years (I mean always 2002 - 2006) follow much better waters» temperatures trend; — metropolis and larger cities temperature trends actually show an increase in UHI effect, but I think the sites are few, and the covered area is very small worldwide, so the global effect is very poor (but it still can be sensible for regional effects); but I would not run out a small warming trend for airport measurements due mainly to three things: increasing jet planes traffic, enlarging airports (then more buildings and more asphalt — if you follow motor sports, or simply live in a town / city, you will know how easy they get very warmer than air during day, and how much it can slow night - time cooling) and overall having airports nearer to cities (if not becoming an area inside the city after some decade of hurban growth, e.g. Milan - Linate); — I found no point about UHI in towns and villages; you will tell me they are not large cities; but, in comparison with 20-40-60 years ago when they were «countryside», many small towns and villages have become part of larger hurban areas (at least in Europe and Asia) so examining just larger cities would not be enough in my opinion to get a full view of UHI effect (still remembering that it has a small global effect: we can say many matters are due to UHI instead of GW, maybe even that a small part of measured GW is due to UHI, and that GW measurements are not so precise to make us able to make good analisyses and predictions, but not that GW is due to UHI).

Normal, non-ideology-based scientists question the veracity of the CRU — IPCC flavoured results just because the JBM camaraderie - based group did refuse to honour such requests and people ask the following question: why, if both the empirical results — the raw data (including the nitty - gritty details of the temperature measurements) AND the theoretical model - based machinery are above board and the overall climatological picture of a man (n)- made warming is pretty much a safe bet, why then would some AGW researchers like the JBM gang refuse to accept that they, too, have got to conform to normal scientific procedure and release the raw data and the details of the theoretical machinery used to understand those data?