Sentences with phrase «just for certain things»

Not exact matches

She chooses to eat certain things for breakfast just because she knows a photo of it will get her a high score.

And so for us, it's still about focusing a certain portion of our budget on just pure brand building: creating that emotional connection, disrupting, and doing things in an interesting way.

Rather than just giving people money we should develop ways so that you can earn more money if you do certain things that are good for you and maybe good for society.

For a certain set, it's other things they're after: dog sled rides, solving puzzles, going to concert performances, racking up some serious hot tub time, and just parking one's self in front of the fire.

The timeline to commercial use can vary — this year's picks, for example, range from technologies that are currently on the market to ones that are still in the lab and just barely making headlines — but two things have to be certain: The technology must be «fundamentally new,» and it needs to make a huge difference in the way we live for years to come.

Sorry, I thought certain things are just kind of obvious to anyone with the capacity to actually think for themselves.

Atheists: I know many there are many people that practice religion just by fanaticism, I've seen many people in my opinion stupid (excuse the word) praying to saints hopping to solve their problems by repeating pre-made sentences over and over, but there are others different, I don't think Religion and Science need to be opposites, I believe in God, I'm Catholic and I have many reasons to believe in him, I don't think however that we should pray instead of looking for the cause and applying a solution, Atheists think they are smart because they focus on Science and technology instead of putting their faith in a God, I don't think God will solve our problems, i think he gave us the means to solve them by ourselves that's were God is, also I think that God created everything but not as a Magical thing but stablishing certain rules like Physics and Quimics etc. he's not an idiot and he knew how to make it so everything was on balance, he's the Scientist of Scientist the Mathematic of Mathematics, the Physician of Physicians, from the tiny little fact that a mosquito, an insect species needs to feed from blood from a completely different species, who created the mosquitos that way?

So how do you go from that reasoning to «Since it wasn't accidental then it must have been this ancient male diety named (fill in blank depending on religion) who loves me and knows me and cares for me and wants me to perform rituals that have nothing to do with morality like prayer, not eating certain things, sabaath and many more just because he said so, even though we have no record of him saying anything, just records of humans who wrote things down that they claim he said, but I want to believe it all so badly I will base my beliefs on no other evidence than «it just can't be accident».

Well it is true that some people seek sorcerers to implement Jinn that are satanic demons into mankind or his house or his business to finish him or make his life miserable or to stop flow of his business income... In such case it is either you are religious enough and say your prayers often then it becomes hard for this to harm you or otherwise you need to find some one who practice exorcism to remove this evil... But many are just pretending to be good at it and help you not but squeeze money out of you with tales and stories... There is another type of possessions and that is not through a sorcerer but directly by coincidence what man is at his weakest moments and those weakest moments for a possessions are when you come through a great fear or when cry or laugh loudly in hysteria, or during a certain moment of mating... or even when sneezing loudly... That's why there are prayers to be said on daily basis to guard you from such things and specially if passing haunted places such as deserted houses but most evil ones are residents of public toilets and market places... Some of them even would claim that you have made a wrong action by which you have killed a dear one to them and for that they have possessed you and that is mostly night time such as throwing a cigaret butt to a dark place or stepping killing an insect or even an animal at night which could have been one of them or possessed by one of them... So this is true thing happening to many who suffer unexplainable illnesses or sufferings which could look like mental illness that comes and goes as pleased...

As long as they are viable for some purposes, things don't die out just because other things evolved «past» them in certain ways.

Just because Christ is shown doing or being certain things for the church in the Ephesians 5:21 - 33 text, does not mean that husbands are to do or be each of those same things for their wives.

I have just wondered through all these replys I have read that in my thoughts people usually pray sincerely when asking God for any certain thing.

Well I decided to research certain things and upon further examination I found more and more credible evidence for God existing, I started to think that maybe, just maybe, God could exist.

For a believer «prayer» isn't just a system of saying certain things.

Just believe or do certain things in your life and you get infinitely rewarded in an afterlife for all eternity.

Therefore, we just don't know for sure, so the only thing we can do is rule out certain types of gods, or theories, based on science and logic.

I would reject as uncalled for and unsound the skepticism of those scholars who hold that we have no trustworthy indications whatever as to the character, the teaching and the career of Jesus of Nazareth, but I would be inclined to agree that there are not many particular points where we can feel absolute assurance, We can be sure that Jesus said a certain kind of thing, but not that he said just this thing or that.

However, do not wait for the almighty to appear in your room to give a direct answer, only one thing you should do, assuming that you are like myself, just normal: ask yourself if what you believe in sounds certain or utterly true.

Neither of us, I think, was quite certain just what contribution I might be making to the enterprise, but I was a reasonably educated and reasonably pious» though hardly properly observant» Jew who had worked for many years as an editor, and since Religion and Public Life had recently begun publishing First Things, I suppose it was thought that I was qualified to add some, albeit hardly scholarly, expertise to the enterprise.

Just about anything people have grown up with or live with becomes natural and people tend to feel absolutely certain about a lot of things they have no basis for believing.

I heard someone suggest yesterday that certain apocryphal material was left out because it wasn't profitable for the faith... Just made me think there were a few more things that maybe shouldn't have made the cut... (besides the obvious that those negotiators of the 3rd century probably didn't really care about not making Jesus a misogynist...)

because I needed help.Long story short.I am a slow learner and need time to absorb info.I don't like to just touch subject matter here and there.I like to go chapter by chapter and that takes to much time out of peoples busy day.O well, God has all the time in the world, and I have till I die.because I was on the computer a certain day, at a certain time, looking for a certain thing.

I have personally known straight people cross over just to find out it's not there thing, and others love annal sex and oral sex... remember after a certain age sex loses a lot of appeal and then where are you, remember if you have no faith then you have nothing to look forward to, if you do, then you have a lot explaining to do to the man upstairs, either way enjoy what ever you do for the short time you have left!

I have a certain level of respect and appreciation for that, but I also hope there is someone close to you who can point out some things you are just plain refusing to see.

Well, for one thing Romney isn't in any church leadership role currently, so basically he is just like anyone else who is of a certain faith who also happens to be running for office, so how does someone in that situation run for office when it comes to the idea of separation of church and state?

It doesn't have to be long, just finish this sentence: The things that I know for certain about gluten free baking are....

They are just the thought of thing I would set myself a certain number on a plate then keep going back to the freezer for more!

Remys 1st, he was class according to some here, second match he is shit.just like the case some already saying he wanted us to buy jovetic just because he scored 2goals but did nt say the same thing when jove was in the physio room last season and will not reapeat it when he gets injured again.most here are quick to say «i clamoured for a certain player to be bought» when such a player is performing but none here would say» i was wrong» on their favourite players (that eventually flop) that we did nt buy.i think i am beginning to understand hafiz now when he named fans favourites: cisse, diame, capoue, victor moses etc..

«But just as every season seems to be full of the same old issues for Arsenal in general, is the failure of certain Arsenal stars to play to their potential on regular basis perhaps caused by the same thing (person), Wenger?»

Hlo as me JOSH all those transfers being made are all for nothing because Wenger can not mange to close the right player to play a certain team just see from the FA Cup which is the only league he can mange and placed the players he want the only thing is to sack him out then the club will start doing well that is my thought as a young Arsenal fan forever thanks am from Uganda

One thing is for certain in my mind, when both fit, Wilshire is head and shoulders ahead of Ramsey who just doesn't have a football mind or any discipline at all, so he leaves his DM partner exposed when he plays in Santi's role.

This thing is being given too much attention.There a lot of players Arsenal passed up on that Mourinho may have also signed you know.In fact there a lot of top players who Arsenal passed up on signing when they were young and for some even matured.Does this mean they aren't good enough?Wenger even regrets passing up on certain players.The fact is that everyone has his basis for signing or not signing a player.Clearly, Wenger and Mourinho both have their basis on whether Lacazette was good enough.One player who is deemed average to another team could be deemed useless to another team.I just don't know why much attention is being given to this thing.One thing I know for sure is Laca is a good finisher and that's alk he needs this season.If Lacazette brings his finishing boots this season it's going to be goals galore.

While we won't know for certain where Najee Harris is headed until after the Army All - American Game (when he'll just show up at either Michigan or Alabama and start classes), things certainly seem to be trending in favor of the Wolverines.

much like when a country can't divulge highly classified information publicly for obvious economic and military reasons, a professional soccer organization must keep certain things in - house so they don't devalue a player, expose a weakness, provide info that could give an opposing club leverage in future negotiations and / or give them vital intel regarding a future match, but when dishonesty becomes the norm the relationship between cub and fan will surely deteriorate... in our particular case, our club has done an absolutely atrocious job when it comes to cultivating a healthy and honest relationship with the media or their fans, which has contributed greatly to our lack of success in the transfer market... along with poor decisions involving weekly wages, we can't ever seem to get true market value for most of our outgoing players and other teams seem to squeeze every last cent out of us when we are looking to buy; why wouldn't they, when you go to the table with such a openly desperate and dysfunctional team like ours, you have all the leverage; made even worse by the fact that who wouldn't want to see our incredibly arrogant and thrifty manager squirm during the process... the real issue at this club is respect, a word that appears to be entirely lost on those within our hierarchy... this is the starting point from which all great relationships between club and supporters form... this doesn't mean that a team can't make mistakes along the way, that's just human nature, it's about how they chose to deal with these situations that will determine if this relationship flourishes or devolves..

If he comes, it's almost certain he will do well and after Moyes and LVG they need a proven winner in England which he fits that bill, I just hope it's not some crazy long contract and we can get Pochetino in next few years as in my opinion as things go right now he would be the best man for our club long term.

But, I make certain that they know that they do not just get everything that they ask for because things cost money.

This is a great milestone since the baby sippy cups are not just for giving the baby something to drink but also for shaping certain things such as drinking position and mouth movement as earlier mentioned.

I didn't mean it so much as your article gave off that vibe, I definitely noted you mentioning several times that it isn't a massive factor for you, it's more that I was on a bit of a cycle of reading these types of articles combined with the comments to the article the consensus I picked up was the majority was on the side of «if he can't pull in a big wage his compassion and caring side count for nothing» and that just makes me feel like there's a slight double standard that exists with certain things.

Just to put in my.02 on this, this is a very difficult problem to have, and I believe that there are no truly right or wrong answers — the right answer is whatever you find that works best for you and your baby, which may be a combination of things; certain ideas may be very wrong for some people and very right for others.

My husband and I work full time and my parents had my babies so it was important for me to establish routines from an early stage, please don't get me wrong, my babies never went without anything, they just had things at certain times.

It also doesn't say squat about the literally hundreds of other things you could worry about (like kids with allergies and asthma getting their hands on certain foods, the host taking the kids in a car without a car seat, a backyard trampoline, alcohol / drugs left around the house, playing in the front yard abutting a very busy street, etc. etc. etc.) It's just meant to talk about your child's preparedness for being away from mom and dad.

Although there are a lot of baby name lists with a wide range of topics that display things like the most popular names, awesome names from your favorite series, names that end in certain letter of the alphabet (just to name a few), very few people who are looking for an uncommon name actually think to look for the least popular names of the current year as possible choices - when they definitely should!

It could be tricky admitting you're wrong about certain things, but in some people's cases, they're just too far gone and have been behaving the same way for so long, it'll be near on impossible to address and ultimately rectify the issues.

Ron Paul supporters are the most persistent / relentless / verging - on - annoying online activists I've seen in quite a while (it ain't for nothin'that they've been banned from certain conservative blogs), but this new endeavour pushes things just a bit too far.

The idea is that certain things are Natural Monopolies, and for those, since you are going to have a monopoly anyway, you should just accept that, and make it as accountable to the people forced to use it as possible.

One thing is for certain, the rioters didn't just take a militant stance.

We shouldn't die for certain things that may well just be because of a chemical firing off in one part of the brain.

At this point it isn't clear just how many planets we'll be able to analyze — it might be a dozen, or it might be millions — but one thing's for certain: If we find methane or another biological marker on just one planet, it will completely redefine our understanding of the universe and the lifeforms that inhabit it.

We call a thing «good» because it promotes certain petty human conditions that we happen to like — whereas it is just as sensible to assume that all humanity is a noxious pest which should be eradicated like rats or gnats for the good of the planet or of the universe.

One trend I've noticed in the real food and health communities lately is an almost fanatical obsession with an certain aspect of healthy living, while completely ignoring (or just not doing) other things that are just as important for health.