Not exact matches
Not that I would dream of rehearsing the controversy again; but I will note that, at the time, I took my
general point to be not that natural - law
theory is inherently futile, but rather that its proponents often fail to grasp
just how nihilistic the late modern view of reality has become, or how far our culture has gone toward losing any coherent sense of «nature» at all, let alone of any realm of moral meanings to which nature might afford access.
The
theory of societies, like modern
general systems
theory, pictures a world made up of societies within societies (systems within systems) That is, societies do not
just line up side by side like mosaics — they form «nested hierarchies» that go from subatomic particles through cells to animal bodies, or through stars to galaxies.
Oakes appears to think that the American Catholic populace - at - large (including, presumably, him and me) is relieved from having opinions or making judgments about the justness of a particular act of war contemplated by our country because the classical
just war
theory permits those judgments only to statesmen and
generals.
«If t is produced
just by arbitrarily conjoining any other statement e2 to e1, we should certainly not want a confirmation
theory in
general to allow e1 to confirm e2.
General relativity breaks down, quantum physics also fail us and all other
theories are
JUST theories and can not be duplicated or proved since the conditions can not be duplicated.
The only way in which her defense could be deemed plausible would be if the church in
general had maintained in practice, not
just theory, a high view of marriage.
Defending his nutty conspiracy
theory, Mr McCluskey claimed: «We found out
just a couple of years ago that the chair of my union then, the Transport and
General Workers Union, was an MI5 informant at the time that there was a strike taking place that I personally as a worker was involved in.
It was not until the detection of quasars, which allow astronomers to see the light emitted by matter falling into black holes, that we had evidence that they were real objects and not
just mathematical curiosities predicted by Einstein's
general theory of relativity.
Yet
just by studying such a possibility, physicists are hoping to make a breakthrough in their efforts to combine
general relativity and quantum mechanics into a
theory of quantum gravity — one of the most intractable problems in physics today.
By 1982 Barbour and Bertotti had come up with a new
theory of gravity (pdf) that described the world
just as accurately as Einstein's
general relativity but without invoking time as a fundamental dimension.
The discovery immediately becomes a likely candidate for a Nobel Prize, and not
just because it ties a neat bow around decades of evidence supporting a major prediction of Einstein's 1915
general theory of relativity.
In fact
just about every moving object stirs up such waves, according to Einstein's
general theory of relativity.
This meant it
just missed the 100th anniversary of Albert Einstein's publication of the
theory of
general relativity — whose predictions scientists hope to test with instruments like those on board.
But for those who
just want to engage with Einstein's
theory, there's Relativity: The special and
general theory 100th anniversary edition (Princeton University Press, $ 26.95), a republishing of the work Einstein intended for a popular audience.
When we combine
general relativity with quantum
theory, we find moderately strong evidence that wormholes can not exist after all — but we
just don't know for sure yet.
Just as his earlier work paved the way to harnessing the smallest subatomic forces, the
general theory opened up an understanding of the largest of all things, from the formative Big Bang of the universe to its mysterious black holes.
Two stars are speeding around the big black hole at the Milky Way's core in
just the way his
general theory of relativity predicted.
They measured it
just because it was there, with no inkling that it would soon emerge as the sole experimental anchor of a revolutionary new conception of space and time — the
general theory of relativity.
The answer is an exotic form of matter in
just the right state to put a key assumption of Einstein's
general theory of relativity to the test.
Einstein's
general theory of relativity turns 100 this year, and
just wait until you see our birthday present.
It does make a lot of sense; after all, no one has time to read every review out there, and it's a lot easier (and in
theory, a lot more reliable) to
just get a
general consensus on the latest theatrical releases.
When students are identified to receive special education services, they have the same rights and deserve the same quality of education as
general education students — not
just in
theory but in daily action.
If you're going to change it, if you're going to implement Common Core and replace CAPT with SBAC, explain it to us,
just like you'd explain Einstein's
theory of
general relativity, Shakespeare's iambic pentameter and the four major language families of Burma.
Get some help In
theory, you need to hold an annual
general meeting, but most small businesses
just sign AGM documents that a lawyer provides.
«
Just world»
theory posits a
general psychological mechanism that affects everyone.
If this were
just an arcane dispute among scientists (such as superstring
theory, an area of my own interest where the battles are
just as fierce, but largely invisible to the
general public), the WSJ would have had no reason to publish Koonin's column.
That doesn't mean the skeptic is right
just because he found a few anomalies in the
general theory.
Amateur
theories about global warming are a dime a dozen and, unfortunately, that can make it hard for the
general public and policy makers to figure out what's based on sound science and what has
just been made up in 5 minutes by someone who doesn't know anything about climate science.
We would like a forum that is something more than
just endless debates and personal
theories, I don't speak about your forum Wayne, I haven't even visited it yet, I'm
just talking in
general here, so don't take it personally.
As mentioned above, there's no
general consensus on the size of the new iPad Pro
just yet, but the running
theory at this point seems to point to a 10.5 - inch panel.
This was to test the
theory that maybe the camera doesn't need to be at a 7 «0 height for everyone, and perhaps
just a little above your head in
general.
In the case of the Board that I am most familiar with, I can attest to the fact that the members
general understanding of Designated Agency was seen as being so low that after years of practicing it (in
theory at least) the subject of «Designated Agency» was made the annual Mandatory Course, for one year (a one day class, of course)
just two years ago, to try and correct the problem!