Sentences with phrase «just getting a conversation»

I think that sometimes just getting a conversation started helps.

I think one of the hardest things about networking events is just getting a conversation going with someone — without being awkward about it.

Not exact matches

For us because timing isn't really of the essence, it's not because they're nearby right now, the question is how can we help facilitate people getting conversations going and moving offline after you just match, so I think that means some sort of follow up where you can continue to communicate with your matches almost en masse to say, «Hey i'm free this week» or «Hey check out this Instagram photo.»

Conversation is indeed one of the critical things that so many businesses just don't get.

Getting elected president of CONCACAF [the 41 - nation arm of the world soccer federation representing North and Central America and the Caribbean, in May] just means it involves more travel and more conversations across time zones.

Sometimes, just replying, «You know, I'm not 100 percent sure» breaks the ice and gets a more productive conversation started.

It would take almost 10 minutes into a presentation I was giving to get through the uncomfortable giggles and the locker room jokes and I think that just fueled my determination to have a very fact - based conversation.

Off the heels of TechCrunch50 and just in time for the Inc. 500 conference, which starts tomorrow in Washington, DC, Michael Arrington has 8 tips on how to steer conversations at conferences, without letting ego or sloppiness get in the way.

After that, my date prep sheet lands in my inbox, which has the results of a quick Internet / Facebook search of Lily's imprint, info on tonight's venue (a divey - but - not - too - divey bar that's just far enough away from my apartment that it doesn't look like I'm trying to get her to come home with me), and finally some conversation fodder and jokes.

While conversations with partners, clients, and team members are crucial, time to get work done is just as important.

So the lesson is that when an organization's culture already has a chilling effect, you can't get people to engage in an ongoing, companywide culture of conversation just by telling them to do so.

«When you get someone's name, don't just nod and continue the conversation, try to plug the name into what you're saying.

The Environmental Protection Agency's Administrator's conversations just got a whole lot more private.

When you limit yourself to email and social channels, you just don't get the crisp, targeted communications possible in a phone conversation.

Another way to do — to get out when there is that lull in the conversation, say, «Hey, I want to introduce you to someone, I think you'll have lot in common» and then take that person over there but make sure the person that you are dumping that person off actually would get something out of that conversation because that would just be rude — if there was anything there.

Just in case you forgot, getting what you want out of phone conversations — especially those of the sales and business meeting variety — requires careful timing and social dexterity.

(Need ideas on how to get your conversation just right?

It is unlikely that they will tell you all their secrets but if you can get close enough to them you may be surprised what you may learn, even just from a casual conversation.

You see, big things have changed such that Christianity, whose premises used to just be the baseline assumptions for our cultural conversations, is now getting backed into a corner.

Just let her go, I sort of like the comments she makes because a) they help illustrate the reason why atheists are around in the first place and why we must actually get up and say something and b) she sometimes starts stimulating conversation (obviously she doesn't mean to nor participates).

Just like a couple getting married doesn't always have those conversations

Just curious... is this conversation getting any attention elsewhere on the interwebs?

Saying to a virtual group of strangers, «you don't get to walk into the intimate pain and failures of this divorce», or saying that it's inappropriate to do so on an online forum when I am simultaneously inviting conversation in person... just doesn't mean that I am a — bwa - ha - ha — victimizer.

(You too can have a conversation with God if you get to know him and don't make him angry, just like getting to know anyone else) For fun, I asked him directly if May 21st will be the rapture.

But I guess in one sense people are afraid the conversation will go to «what happened» and just want to avoid getting involved.

If we are praying to get some thing or some result for ourselves or others, then absolutely be prepared for disappointment, but when prayer is just an ongoing conversation with the compassionate, understanding deity bubbling out of a growing relationship with the said deity then you don't give a shit about the results because they are no longer the point.

Reading THE REPUBLIC, you get only a very incomplete idea of what a real woman is like, and that's not just because, as the feminist says, the woman's voice is not heard in the conversation.

She is also an incredibly sweet and kind person, and has shared stories of how she realizes that it's just a sign of the times that she is going to go through some «extra checking» when she travels, or even in conversations with some people, when the word «Iran» comes up, she can visibly see them get uncomfortable.

Remember, that holding two - way conversations with invisible fairies would generally earn a diagnosis for schizophrenia... it's just that religious nuts get a pass if they are talking to THEIR imaginary fairies.

It's not too often I get to go out for supper, let alone just us two, to have a conversation without a single — hang on a second....

[assuming you will say «yes»] Then do you ever wonder if religion talk just gets in the way of having that conversation?

Kudos as well — if I were to meet you in the real world and we got to know one another, I would probably confide that I was an atheist, just to prompt some lively conversation.

OR being i know enough to have a conversation and not just insult, thats just multi-tasking, i am better then those who jkust get upset and bash others... enjoy your point godless existence!

Just wait until the get into a fake conversation with themselves to prop up each other's comments.

He never gets into a conversation about the merits of his claim... he just tosses it on the floor and runs away.

when people get all huffy over my misuse of words or just plain wrong use of them i laugh, because i can bet my life that you still understood my meaning but rather then discuss the issue i brought up chose to insult thru the means of an english teacher — that i care not for... my point was a valid one and it makes me sad that you think yourself so far above me that you won't even bother with the conversation... tisk tisk.

I literally was just having this conversation with a friend 5 minutes ago about not being able to get enough spinach and healthy veggies in my diet.

(Mind you there is a whole other conversation to be had about how the Texans» coaching staff didn't do either of their quarterbacks any favors and how there wasn't anybody open on a lot of the plays when Savage got taken down, just like this one.

Wenger and Dein broke our own transfer record and was only # 4mil short of the English transfer record AFTER A CONVERSATION, Henry spoke to Wenger on a flight and it was that convo that got Wenger to ask Dein for him and Dein got him... Didn't mess around with # XX mil and # 1 bids, he just got the player!

2) No leaders across the pitch: Özil for all the money is no leader but a technically gifted player who can split a defense with an exquisite vision and pass, Sanchez for all the dribbles as the potential but is not there yet, Cazorla will never be in the conversation, Mertesacker is not fit to be one anymore, Coquelin for all the good he has done is too tender and inexperience, Giroud no WC player to assume the role... the only one who can seriously be a leader is Wilshere but unfortunately until he becomes consistent and set the tone with his talent and passion... 3) Mertesacker is a shell of himself and it would be an embarrassment to see him continue to play in his current form, get Gabriel out just for the sake of showing anybody in this team that there's no place for under performers: we paid good money to get him so play him!

Just as important as being a part of the conversation was that both teams were mediocre - to - bad for as long as I had been paying attention, and I wanted to get in before one of them started winning.

Complete the sign up form to get the conversation started, or just email us directly.

Also he seems to talk the way he likes and Kiyan seems so soft and respectful to that shitbag it frustrates me.I think gabe and om would shred him to pieces on his shit comments.I guess, it wasnt just 1 or 2 people who did nt like this podcast seeing the comment section today.I wish kiyan would engage in more fruitful conversations with other journalists so we can gain more knowledge about laliga and world football in general.Not this cule babling shit cuz that never gets old.

The Knights were foolish enough to think they could get involved in the conversation in just one year.

He lives in a modest apartment just off the Florida campus, and in conversation he cites the Lord every 15 minutes or so, but he'll be damned if he knows when he'll get eight hours of shut - eye.

This wasn't the Yanks just butting in on a conversation to try to get Bruce at the last minute.

«He just gets so angry and negative towards them, I can't have a conversation with him about it.

Just looking back to conversation and how it began, now realised you suddenly popped in between without knowing what the debate was.The debate was started when a person signified that we do smart tranfers unlike other teams, to which I said getting 4 quality players for 77 odd million is smart and I also wanted to know what smart actually means and thats why I picked old examples.

Whoever decided to have this game at 12:30 on a Saturday (1): I've managed to get a transcript of the conversation, between two individuals, which led to this scheduling: «Sick idea boiz, let's have both Liverpool n City play on Sat, after they've just played on Wed lololololol» «Gr8 idea m8, let me just finish hoovering up my curtains first».

I watched the thread for the entire evening after a Nestle representative got on to answer questions and instead of quelling the fire it just seemed to be an «attempt» to join the conversation without really conversing about anything.