Sentences with phrase «just give him more money»

«If you liked my company last year so much why don't you just give me more money to get through «Winter?»

His answer to every problem is to just give more money and not exactly get to a solution,» Malliotakis told me shortly after announcing her run against Bill de Blasio.

The real problem is allowing the wealthy elite to buy elections and politicians, and that is what we need to end, not just giving more money to more candidates,» said Hawkins.

For example, ever since the 1990's Professor David Mills and Dr Mark Diesnedorf have been making statements like: — solar power is cost competitive with nuclear power now as a baseload generator, if the government would just give us some more money to demonstrate it — wind power is cheaper than nuclear and because the wind is always blowing somewhere wind can provide baseload generation.

Not exact matches

Whether your managers like you or not, they're not just going to give you more money.

Mr. Money Mustache, who wrote I Just Gave Up $ 4000 Per Month to Keep My Freedom of Speech, sounds like he improved his life more keeping his freedom than he would have with the mMoney Mustache, who wrote I Just Gave Up $ 4000 Per Month to Keep My Freedom of Speech, sounds like he improved his life more keeping his freedom than he would have with the moneymoney.

Rather than just giving people money we should develop ways so that you can earn more money if you do certain things that are good for you and maybe good for society.

These 14 billionaires just promised to give away more than half of their money like Bill Gates and Warren Buffett

But that just gives the criminals more money for future attacks.

But the FBI's and CFTC's theory here is far more troubling: It suggests that existing algorithms are not just dumb enough to give spoofers some of their money, but dumb enough to give spoofers so much of their money that they destabilize the financial markets.

It is a manual about getting money from those who have it and are, given reason and their interests met, very willing to spend it — on just about everything, and more of it, at higher average prices than any other consumers.

Well, the truth is you have to do more than just give money away for it to count toward a charitable donations tax deduction.

Just as we have a mission in early retirement to figure out what we want to do when we grow up, and to adventure more, we also have a mission to be more charitable, both by volunteering and by giving money directly to important causes.

For Casper, the new money gives it the funds to continue to expand into new products and invest in marketing as it tries to become known for more than just mattresses and break away from a pack of competitors like Leesa and Tuft & Needle, which have raised little to no venture capital but are still growing.

Money expert Clark Howard does more than just work to help you save money — he's also dedicated to charitable giMoney expert Clark Howard does more than just work to help you save money — he's also dedicated to charitable gimoney — he's also dedicated to charitable giving.

However when the government gives you a break it doesn't matter how much it costs, you just keep spending more to make money faster.

This is why we launched The Frontline this week as a monthly giving community where we give more than just our money, we give ourselves.

I would never give money to a religious organization that doesn't pay taxes — that is like giving money to my kids — and they need it more than the church... I think faith is a wonderful thing for a lot of people — including myself (I have faith in myself)-- I just wish others would keep their «faith» personal, and out of politics and government.

Second, do you wonder why Evangelicals have so much money and that $ 100 million is just the money sent to israel; we give more to charities in the US.

I don't think it's so much about the levites being paid for their service it's about us doing what's right toward Pastors that must feed and tend to the flock of GOD if GOD has called them.JESUS even said in luke 10:7 that the laborers are worthy of their wages.In luke 8 1 - 4 it's says even JESUS HIMSELF recieved financial support from the women who ministered to him with their possessions.Now most people today would say he should have been ashamed of taking money from those poor women but JESUS accepted their support and they was blessed for sowing onto the LORD»S work.1 Corinthains 9:1 - 15 says dint muzzle the ox while it tread out the grain was GOD talking about oxes no he was talking about those who labor in the ministry.Who goes to war at their own expense.Or who goes to war but pay for their clothes, guns, etc.No one because the goverment if that country provide these things because of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLESS.

Robert - «He gives his money to anit - gay organizations that are labeled hate groups, this is more than just an opinion for this guy.»

He gives his money to anit - gay organizations that are labeled hate groups, this is more than just an opinion for this guy.

I was talking to a person if he went to church and he stated all they want is your money.You got to give your money to read books about GOD, I mean like thirty dollars and more and the same for a dvd or like if you could give 1,000 or more to keep on the air.He and I both think we are better off stay at home and read the Bible and study it.I think if you are born with the new sperit of GOD you will understand the Bible without the loss of great somes of money.After they sell so many dvds it becomes 100 % profit and they never lower the price so can obtain one.For this is wrong, it states in the Bible that this would happen preachers for money to learn about everyones GOD.They forgot one thing JESUS never forced money from you to hear the wordof salvation Im a follower of JESUS CHRIST OUR LORD He is the way.Im not a so called Christian just.

She gives so much more information than just recipes and also includes recipes to make your own mixes, which ultimately saves time and money.

A move wouldn't actually be surprising as there is an existing relationship between the two clubs, Real paid Newcastle more than 10 million pounds for no reason a couple of years ago, and then Newcastle gave the money back just for fun last season.

It would be nice if we could just give everyone more money, but unfortunately the economy doesn't work that way.

Even if the gig with ESPN fails, he still probably made more money going there and then going back to HBO rather than just taking whatever HBO would give him.

His best season with the club he scored more than a few & was having a positive impact on both ends... just got to get that back but Elneny will give him a run for his money.

I think only barca real or Bayern can tempt those players away from leicester, they would give at least a year to the club, but season after that they will move onto other club depending on their form next season.As for arsenal transfer i wouldn't want to listen to rumours as most of the times these rumours are just utter garbage.i want a certain rumour about Wolfsburg signing giroud to be true.Anyways if our idiotic manager has some sense left in him after an embarrassing season he should get a premium striker which the club needed for past 4 years.He need to put his ego aside and his old philosophy of waiting for players to develop.We need already established players in every department of our team.Penny pinching has cost us just pay the damn money get the players.I get the feeling next season is going to be harder and we have less chance of winning cause man city have had 2 seasons without premier league and guardiola is gonna bring more quality and hunger to that team.

For my money and this is only personally speaking I feel that Walcott should get far more stick than Giroud Walcott has been «developing» for nearly ten years and especially this season just gone has done next to nothing, even when given a place in the starting line up.

That is disputable we were just in another cup final its like you apparently do nt like cup finals do nt like trophys a big stadium he brought to us a top class training facility he brought to us im sorry he played a huge part in making the club a global giant and that our club success makes you angry and our new sponsor signing which emirates only endorsed with such big money since his success like if we get a manager who loses consistently for 20 years you will apparently be happy give it one more year we have top four next year maybe even a title its a world cup year any new manager would start outhorribly

The Man United manager Jose Mourinho moaned the other day that he wasn't given enough money to compete with the oil - rich moneybags of man City, but Arsene Wenger says that Jose is already at one of the richest clubs but he is just going to have to get used to Man City having more finances than himself.

As long as the fans pay their money Gazidas and Kroenke don't give a shit about the Arsenal fans feelings, we're just their cash cows to make more money for themselves, Wenger is a disgrace to receive # 8 million a year for failure, WENGER OUT!!!!!!!!!!!

But before we say «Give him 200K and more just make sure he stays», it is crazy money that we are talking about here.

I think gmv8 is right, there is something sinister going on behind the scenes, the way the team played today wasn't just usual wenger's fault, yes his time is up and he needs to retire but i think there is more to the team than we know, players weren't communicating with each other on the pitch, they weren't caring about the game at all, at one of the goals i saw ramsey was talking to another player and not giving a damn about the game at all, there is some internal crisis between players, some probably hate each other, the defenders and the midfield lost the ball too much that it seemed they are doing it deliberately, some players seem to want out but not gone yet that makes me think they want out not because of money or the club but because they hate each other, specially Ox and Sanchez!!

Emirates stadium and huge sponsor deals we finally have had two poor years by his standards at the helm we always havent been so great and are we weak supporters or strong give him a contract i mean hes won with ants for money let him spend for once cause even if we do get new manager inflation has occured and no body else will win with the small amounts we gave him to spend and in 20 years actuall more it seems the club is finally willing to spend give him a contract let him spend and if we do nt improve which i think we will i think that the club is finally willing to spend shows were on an upturn because as long as top four the owner and board weren't and after we spend big or somewhat big for once and auba and mkhitaryan arent the big im hoping for i want more if liverpoodlians can pay 75million for a cb let wenget spend a bit and if we still do bad we can always sack him or ask him to leave wouldnt be uncommon but we owe it to him and do nt say we do not because emirates london colney that will bring in high talent here for years to come and we have never spent for him just gave little and hes always done big things with little i think he can do bigger things in his final years if we give him big i do nt see us in decline but if we sack him we will be for a good three maybe four years

Just be patient, we need to support our team to get through the tough start of the season — CL qualification also gives Wenger more money to strengthen the squad before the market close.

Paying a 24 - year - old MVP the kind of money he's earning for his team makes far more sense than tacking on a fifth year to the contract given to a 30 - year - old MVP, just because that's always how it's been done.

Just giving a player, any player, who lacks courage, fight and character, more money will not make him the player he could be if he possessed those qualities.

i agree andy but its not just the 4 years of hard work that should be taken into account, firstly the fai hav missed out on millions at a time where money is already tight, and more importantly the fact that given, kilbane, o shea, dunne, duff, whelan and keane may be too old when the next one comes around and for a professional footballer to hav a chance to represent his country on the biggest stage of all taken away in this manner is cruel, there can be no argument against technology when there is so much at stake as for henry being labelled a cheat i do not agree as it came at him so quick and although he in fact handled it twice i do not believe it was pre-meditated like maradonnas effort or that disgusting dive by anelka at 0 - 1... can any1 who watched the game live please tell me how lass diarra stayed on the pitch let alone avoided a yellow??

They strengthen rival sides, collected money — more sharks would come to get their best players like Harry Kane and Dele Alli — gave realistic excuses but something is just off.

Just as in grown - up spaces, no nursery decor project gives you more effect for your money than painting.

I've heard really good things about this sunscreen and would love to give it a try but haven't just for the sake of chancing wasting more money.

Instead of throwing money away on fresh flowers, why not give a new baby gift that is just as beautiful, FAR more practical, and CERTAIN to be used - a diaper cake!

But I'm sure Obama has thought of this and will spend the money more wisely and won't just give it to people to eat...

This week's news that Obama's 2012 campaign has already assembled a powerful army of small online donors — more than a million people have given him money so far, only half of whom did so in 2008 — provided just one of many recent glimpses into the growth of what's shaping up to be a reelection juggernaut.

Also published on HuffingtonPost This week's news that Obama's 2012 campaign has already assembled a powerful army of small online donors — more than a million people have given him money so far, only half of whom did so in 2008 — provided just one of many recent glimpses...

But no - one could point directly to the good that Google was failing to do by avoiding tax — no - one could say «look, Starbucks gave money that helped build ten schools and five hospitals, and you contributed nothing», partly because Starbucks didn't give any more money (and nor did many other corporations), and partly because connecting tax contributions directly to outcomes just isn't possible with our tax system.

Given that reality, I think you are throwing good money after bad by just pouring more money into the current system that we have.

Finally, when Clinton lost, donations to the CF plunged to a trickle... as if the donors were expecting something more than just a warm glow of satisfaction for all that money they gave.