Sentences with phrase «just having these labels»

However, just having these labels does not guarantee that the product is healthy.

Not exact matches

«I had seen so many startups that were just like lambs to the slaughter — labels would get some payments from them and let them die,» Pärson said.

The company has 60 million paying subscribers, just renegotiated long - term licensing deals with three major record labels, and is valued at about $ 15 billion.

The debates» toxicity has most members of Congress hoping the issue will just go away, lest they be labeled traitors to the American worker.

While tech companies dislike paying taxes — just look at Apple, which keeps much of its money offshore to avoid taxes, or Twitter, which once threatened to leave San Francisco unless it received a special tax break — none of them wants to be labeled as an opponent of anything that would provide help for the homeless and those with low incomes.

Sales have been muddled in recent years and the company is in the process of remaking itself just a few years after it acquired private - label manufacturer Ralcorp for nearly $ 5 billion in early 2013.

As I've argued before, when you are as massive a media entity as Facebook (despite its desire to avoid that label), it is incumbent on you to address your responsibilities directly, and possibly even ask for help, rather than just waving at the algorithm behind the curtain.

«We label it as «special request,»» they wrote, so the employees filling the order «have to literally stop working just to come over and ask what the special request is.»

A third float depicts British Prime Minister Theresa May, wearing a Union Jack dress in bed and, doting on a deformed creature labelled «Brexit» to which she appears to have just given birth.

«What other people label or might try to call failure, I have learned is just God's way of pointing you in a new direction» - Oprah Winfrey

«Especially since we started the label, we've realized that we're in the Hanson business, not just the music business.»

When Cowboy Ventures founder Aileen Lee coined the term unicorn as a label for such corporate creatures in a November 2013 TechCrunch blog post, just 39 of the past decade's VC - backed U.S. software startups had topped the $ 1 billion valuation mark.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has just revised the proposed nutrition label changes to emphasize just how much sugar we consume from packaged food and drinks.

Either find the wine in the database or just take a picture of the label and the app will be able to tell you if you'll like it based on what you've liked in the past.

First, though this just labels the question posed above, the pass - through of dollar / exchange - rate changes to import prices has fallen from 60 to 25 percent.

Before the Dominion Elections Act (1920), voting in Canadian federal elections was largely governed by the provinces, just as voting in US federal elections is still, even today, governed by the «several States» (as they are wont to put it)-- except for the 1917 wartime election, labelled as the «largest gerrymander in Canadian history» (I've just finished a fascinating book about that election, fought over the issue of conscription; I highly recommend it).

It's one of a variety of such syndromes we track, and I've simply labeled it «Bubble,» because with a single exception, this extreme variant has only emerged just before the worst market collapses in the past century.

While Nuplazid has just barely started to scratch the surface of the PDP market, management is also pushing for expanding the drug's labeling.

Of course lots of people do things I would label as love, but it is just a label for things I like and want to happen.

I'm speaking about my own faith only: To become a Christian, it must be your own choice.No else can decide this life style for you.I know many in the past and present have thought raising a child under the Christian label will save them for hell but in actual reality, the choice is their own not their parents etc.This life (being Christian) goes deeper than just believing.You have to consider this yourself.Many today do not even consider Christ as their savior because they just believe what their church or family says.

If the real owner shows up and threatens me then I'll just tell him that he should have labeled his bridge better, or gotten more trustworthy agents to collect tolls.

just because the label carries a negative connotation has no bearing on whether you fit into it or not.

Thus, we have «positive and negative» as arbitrary but handy labels to show the dynamic opposition between the two according to the topological dynamics and interactive properties — yet the two poles are part of the same thing, just as with the poles of the Earth.

I would probably be able to safely just call it a cult, [that label is] not that far off.

«You have publicists, you have managers, you have labels, you have a whole team of people who try and create a certain buzz and then that song just did it all on its own, which is pretty remarkable.»

Those who questioned too deeply or sometimes at all (just THINK about raising your hand during a sermon) were frequently labeled as doubters, which would mean auto - hell upon death.

Love, anger, fear, etc., are just descriptive words to label what has been defined as feelings that takes place in a physical being in a physical world.

but on the third day using his Power of Resurrection rose from the dead to claim his seat next to God in heaven, I mean next to himself since he was also God and then told the masses that he died for their sins, though oddly enough being God he could have simply absolved them of their sins and he really didn't die because he lives and is coming back to judge man based upon the original sins... but not sure if that would work since man can clearly kill a God with wood and nails... I know, I know confusing and likely to be labeled heresy... but debates about nomenclature and religion... i mean story telling... just don't mix.

So, it only be wise of me to accept that there is a Theos, God, Yawheh, and humans just placed a label so He would have a name, just like Bo.

I've taken to just describing peoples actions that I disagree with, rather than labeling the person.

God can't be confined to them and I've decided to not label myself as well... It just limits my ability to search for the truth.

yes, the GOP would probably (inaccurately) label him a Marxist (instead of just «social progressive»).

Indeed, he particularly fears coming out about his attractions while struggling against them, which would get him labeled a repressed homosexual, the gay - basher who himself is queer, the gay kid who thinks it's just some disorder.

Sorry folks, Santa may have helped keep Jimmy in line when he was three, but he's in college now and sneaking gifts into his dorm room labeled «Santa» just isn't cute anymore.

Just because «Spiritual by not religious» does not fit into the pre-concieved notion of what this guy believes in the believes that he can dismiss it and everyone who would label themselves that way.

If we have to conjure labels to distinguish between competing interests, then how about just going by the «haves» and the «have - nots»?

Lukewarm Christian is just a label to say: «Hey, I want eternal life, but I don't want to please God and I want to live my own sinful way, that way, I'm still Christian and I don't have to worry about the consequences.»

Just because someone places a label on you, doesn't mean you have to wear it.

I think «labels» are just a short - hand way of telling people what you believe or what you have concluded, with regard to a particular subject.

There just aren't enough people, youth, etc. to divide up into all the programs church are «supposed» to have in order to be labeled «successful.»

You may not WANT it to be this way, simply because it labels athiest in the same manner as thiests, but that's not going to change the fact that an athiest has a BELIEF about something dealing with a deity just as much as a Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist, Christian, etc. has a BELIEF about something dealing with a deity.

Future historians of Christianity may well describe the century just past as the age of ecumenism; some have already given it that label.

Not just the spiritual nutrition label and the triple yin - yang — which I'd also thought of some time back — but there are so many other details, and descriptions which apply to me as well.

Just as no one has the authority to deny Gid's gift to those God has chosen, most certainly neither does anyone have the authority to impose a false facade against and over God's authority, and worse yet falsely label it as coming from God.

I could be wrong I do believe in a higher power and in love as the universal language (for lack of a better phrase of words, although it might be more universal today to say sex is the universal language) and in this post just now realized I have to change my 100 % enabler label to 99 % based on the higher power belief.

I confess this isn't as easy task, as debating my evangelical status has become something of a sport among Reformed bloggers, and a big part of me is just ready to toss the label and stick with something simple, like Christ follower....

As time goes buy the kind defenders of free will over their rejection to «dead» here and colossians 2:13 tend to resort to a familiar defense, that of labeling it a Calvinist viewpoint and that its almost a cultist view point to hold.Very sad yet very much the defense of many christians.Dead may i suggest is dead, the inability to respond, does not mean that prior to being saved one could not read scripture but because of this spiritual deadness its not profitabel / meaningful - we just can not continue to revise the meaning of dead to fit a view point - because natural man has not been born again this deadness (spiritually) shows itself as «none seek after God», in this condition they are» slaves to sin» and the spiritual things of God (the bible) is «folly / foolishness» even the gospel is judged by natural man as «folly / foolishness «(1 cor.1: 18) Please stop with this weak / common defense called Calvinism - many believers are truly turned off by such a defense.We must not forget the man's «free will» is what took the whole human race down in the garden; i would hope we can rise above our love affair with the human will.

It is just deceptive to use the label Christian by those who feel fully justified in rejecting it as apostate, and claiming to have «restored» the original intent.

It's sad that Christianity has been labeled all these things just because Christians don't believe that homosexuality is wonderful.

The labels don't matter, Christian, Muslim, Buddist... at least they have beliefs and stick with them rather than using God to pump up book sales (or maybe she just likes to see her name in print) Here's a thought.