Instead of recognizing the impact poverty and language barriers actually have on educational outcomes, the «education reformers» claimed that if
we just hold teachers accountable, test scores will go up and students will succeed.
Not exact matches
They don't shuffle between a D.E.A.R book, a reading book, and a literature circle book... they
just read books and are
held accountable for doing so through persistent
teacher / student conferences and an intricate portfolio.
It's how we know, for example, how much progress there has or has not been in closing achievement gaps nationwide, but it
just doesn't work to say we can
hold teachers accountable simply for raising math and reading scores.»
They need a
teacher who
holds them
accountable for their reading
just like with any other assignment.
We created it after I realized how many school leaders
just weren't clearing the space for
teacher coaching to happen at the highest level: foundational things like creating a vision for their schools,
holding adults
accountable to meeting schoolwide expectations, designing and
holding weekly leadership team meetings, creating and sticking to a daily calendar; and more advanced things like using data to inform the design of responsive PD.
But isn't it
just common sense to
hold teachers accountable for their students» academic performance?
A deployment approach assumes that
teachers (and, in some cases, principals) already know what to do; they
just need to be
held accountable for outcomes, and if they can't succeed, then school leaders should find others who can.
And to
hold one person (the
teacher)
accountable for the actions of another person (the student) is
just as unethical.
Just after New Year's Day, Illinois educators introduced a major reform proposal to
hold school administrators, school board members and
teachers accountable for their work on behalf of school children statewide.Three unions representing more than 230,000 Illinois education employees, the Illinois Education Association (IEA), the Illinois Federation of Teachers (IFT) and the Chicago Teachers Union (CTU) termed their plan Accountability
teachers accountable for their work on behalf of school children statewide.Three unions representing more than 230,000 Illinois education employees, the Illinois Education Association (IEA), the Illinois Federation of
Teachers (IFT) and the Chicago Teachers Union (CTU) termed their plan Accountability
Teachers (IFT) and the Chicago
Teachers Union (CTU) termed their plan Accountability
Teachers Union (CTU) termed their plan Accountability for All.
York believes
just as teams of
teachers should be
held accountable for the growth of students, American schools should be
held responsible for the growth of
teachers.
Just a few years ago, prominent leaders were calling to publish
teachers» VAM scores, so that parents and taxpayers could better
hold public school
teachers accountable.
In that sense we need to make sure that it's a system that doesn't
just hold schools,
teachers, and students
accountable, but also politicians, consultants, and foundations.
Just as in the market place, many believe that
holding teachers and schools
accountable for students» learning will lead to improved results.