Sentences with phrase «just human ones»

All of your family members are welcome here, not just the human ones.

Not exact matches

I this all sounds like psycho - babble but I promise you that if you'll commit just one day of your life to go to prison with the team at Defy Ventures you will feel profoundly moved, you will feel deeply human and you will feel the calling to do more.

On the other, each of those bodies is becoming recognizable to the network as not just another human, but a unique and distinct entity — and one that presents a saleable proposition.

«Whenever your human capital is tied up in one particular industry, it may make sense to diversify your investment capital outside of that industry, just because of the amount of risk associated with that.»

It's just one of dozens of quirks of the human psyche, implanted through evolution, that make us favor safe thinking.

And if so, are the humans whose interests matter just the ones who happen to live where you do?

Because one of Shomi's differentiators is human curation, we have the opportunity to take that content and test whether it was an anomaly or are people really digging it, or is it just not fitting our brand our audience?

On the extremely unlikely chance you haven't already noticed, humans haven't been doing too well lately at governing just one planet.

First, there was that lone, cranelike arm, an appealingly simple approach, and one that followed another of Brooks's maxims: Robots should not be humanoid just for the sake of making them look like humans.

Notification abuse is just one example of a larger challenge among so many new tech companies — companies that have seized on the latest hacks of human psychology and the pseudoscience of A / B testing to create highly optimized, highly manipulative products.

Just think of the emotional difference when a customer reads a well - written, well - structured, heartfelt response versus one that lacks any human element.

One person surveyed said, «If companies want to be more «good,» it is just about being normal, being human.»

One is an attempt to make sure that its presence among us actually does some good — that it's not just meeting some demand, but actually contributing to human well - being.

And I would say that was because — this is just one example — the field of economics, for many years, did not incorporate the fact that humans don't make decisions generally on a one - to - one level the way that their models would predict.

For individuals who want more hand - holding from a human life form than just digital zeros and ones, Betterment now offers the Premium tier.

On the most granular level, the stock market is just a medium used for human beings to trade ownership in companies with one another, and you would think that interactions between just two people would have at least some human element in it.

The humanoid robot that can understand human emotion and interact with people from SoftBank and Alderbaran sold out in just one minute on Saturday.

Investing in human capital is just one piece of the entrepreneurial ecosystem puzzle, and has to date not been a key focus area in the region.

Believe in One God and there is no partner with him, No son or any creatures and Jesus was just a messanger sent to Children of Israel who was born thru virgin Marry and no father, this is another miracle of God that He can create a human without father as HE created Adam and Eve without parents... what if you found yourself in «wrong» by believing in multiple Gods?

see what religion does... all in the name of some imaginary sky - daddy, who is nothing but just one of the thousands of «gods» invented by man over the course of human history.

So all other gods are just «Imanigary False Gods» concocted by some greedy, or ignorant, or trickster, or naive humans, this is the one and only real GOD (of Abraham, and Moses, Jesus, David, Muhammad) now and forever!

It's just one of many ways humans have created to put structure around our questions regarding spirituality.

As a country and just as humans we need to respect one another regardless of the belief system, society would be a much better place.

Can't you guys just be happy at one simple article of beauty where a human is showing unconditional caring and kindness toward another human in need of company during those last moments?

The two Persons loving each other do not just have a thought, as human beings would have, but from Their mutual love is breathed forth, as it were, a Living Person, one with Them, and of Their own substance.

Religion in this case was people hearing the very real loving voices of other people, inspired to love one another for whatever reasons they might think they have, and attaching themselves to that love in order to deal emotionally with the struggles we face just by being human.

Isn't there a broad middle ground though, between the literalists on one side, and those who call themselves Christian but don't believe in the Incarnation, the historic creeds and view Jesus and his message as just a righteous human teacher dude.

A modern banana, an ant, a bumble bee, a monkey (the ones you think we came from), and the human brain (among a million other things created) disprove the theory of evolution in just one sentence worth of their description.

Considering the human spectacle today, forty years after the document whose widespread rejection reportedly broke Paul VI's heart, one can't help but wonder how he might have felt if he had glimpsed only a fraction of the evidence now available — whether any of it might have provoked just the smallest wry smile.

He would travel back in time to make sure no one killed Jesus so he would end up dying of old age just like eveyone else and humans would never have to look upon another golden glorified crucifix again.

We just have to be wise enough to know how to recognize the miracle, and not rush headlong past it in our search for «something important»... The good life, the truly human life is based not on a few great moments but on many, many little ones.

LaBella, I certainly agree that the second covenant was necessary because virtually no one could keep all of the laws in thier own human strength, just as we can not even today.

why doesn't ONE god just show himself or herself or itself and then we can get past all this inter-religious death and destruction and damage to the human race?

However, the typical Christian Eternal All - knowing Trinity God who happens to also have a personal interest in what you do in the bedroom just seems too ridiculous to be anything but a human construct, and a jerry - built one at that.

What if the churches around the country took JUST ONE TENTH of the tithing money they bring in in tithes every year, and put it toward rescuing young girls caught in human trafficking?

In fact, many in the scientific community believe that the increasing march of the average level of human intelligence (I.Q.) is just one reason that we have more non-believers now, than at any other time in history.

Partnering with organizations like WorldReach (who allows you to sponsor children) and Charity: Water (who lets you tell your friends to donate instead of getting you a birthday present every year) or finding a cause like ending human trafficking, supporting education or assisting the homeless can represent more than just one - time gifts or temporary passions.

The narrator of The Fall thus explains the death of Jesus in light of an inherent human guilt: it was just as impossible for Jesus to justify his existence as it is for any one, so that the real reason why he went to his death is that he knew he was not altogether innocent.

I just find my source to be much more reliable than that of one which is mired in the human condition.

To take just one example, five hundred years ago, during the Reformation, there was a debate over just how broken human nature truly is.

Now, I realize I could just as easily call it «How to be Decent to One Another on the Internet» or «How to be Human on the Internet,» but given this particular community of readers, I wanted to frame the discussion around specifically Christian values and concerns, (many of which also apply to those of other religious persuasions, of course).

The Tenth Doctor just loved humans and particularly ones like Danny.)

I write from the standpoint of a Church of England parish priest and many of my examples are from that tradition, but I recognize that the Church of England is one church amongst many churches, just as Christianity is one religion amongst many world religions which are slowly learning to share with each other their spiritual treasures and to work together for peace, the relief of human need and the preservation of the planet.

Just look at the plastic rubbish on one tiny little island in the South Pacific that doesn't have any human inhabitants, yet has collected 18 million tonnes of plastic waste just from the sea, despite being in the middle of nowhJust look at the plastic rubbish on one tiny little island in the South Pacific that doesn't have any human inhabitants, yet has collected 18 million tonnes of plastic waste just from the sea, despite being in the middle of nowhjust from the sea, despite being in the middle of nowhere.

I believe that God works through creatures, especially human ones, that that work is transformative, that we can not know in advance just where such transformation will lead, but that we can distinguish God's transforming work when it occurs from other kinds of changes.

Or one who calls «perfect and just» the eternal torture of millions of my ancestors and fellow human beings?

In very personal language, I believe that all things are progressing from the same divine source; that that source is the ground of all being and its essence is love and interdependence; that all human beings (all of life, really) are equal and beloved in its sight; that in response to that overarching, boundless love which ensures that no one is ever truly alone, I have a responsibility to assist in the creation of just and loving community here on Earth.

Just as the world as a whole was viewed as composed of tiny bits of matter that related to one another only externally, that is, spatio - temporally, so human beings were viewed as individuals who relate to one another only externally.

Jesus Christ is the «Elect One,» not by some effort of human nature alone, for that would not be real election, but by God's eternal purpose which «from the beginning of the world» — and long before it, too, if we may so speak — has determined that «in the fullness of the times» there shall be just such an actualization of the potential God - Man relationship as Christian faith discerns in Christ our Lord.

That self - centred tendency is the main obstacle to a just and harmonious society and to the personal, human fulfilment of each one.