Not exact matches
As reiterated in the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change report issued on March 31, scientists estimate that we can emit no more than 500 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide in order to limit the increase in global temperature to just 2 degrees C by 2100 (and governments attending the successive climate summits have agreed in principle to this obje
Climate Change report
issued on March 31, scientists estimate that we can emit no more than 500 gigatonnes
of carbon dioxide in order to limit the increase in global temperature to
just 2 degrees C by 2100 (and governments attending the successive
climate summits have agreed in principle to this obje
climate summits have agreed in principle to this objective).
Granted, there are more benefits to reducing particulate and greenhouse gas emissions than
just climate change, i.e. PM 2.5 which can be stuck in the human lung and cause cancer / respiratory
issues, SO2 which contributes to acid rain (we've already eliminated the majority
of this problem), as well as soot (nobody wants the surrounding area covered in ash).
ALBANY — In
just 12 months, Gov. Andrew Cuomo has positioned himself as one
of the nation's most aggressive governors on
climate issues.
On the
issue of Republicans and Democrats in New York State hiding behind the old «waiting for the science to come in» line that politicians have used to not answer questions on everything from
climate change to Pebble Mine, Hawkins did give the Democrats a bit
of a pass... «The Republicans want to repeal the enlightenment — the Democrats
just want to repeal the New Deal.»
Those
issues encompass more than
just the latest conflicts about the age
of the universe or
climate change - related language in textbooks, she said.
«We've known
just about everything we need to know to do something about this
issue for a very long time,» said Katharine Hayhoe, director
of the Texas Tech University
Climate Science Center.
So when people question the scientific consensus on
issues such as
climate change, vaccine effectiveness or the safety
of genetically modified organisms (SN: 2/6/16, p. 22), it's no surprise that one
of the first inclinations
of journalists and scientists has been to think, hey, these doubters
just don't know the facts.
Not only that, but now more agree than
just six months ago that
climate change is an
issue of morality and social justice.
Although much
of the administration's legislative agenda — in health care, energy,
climate, and immigration, to cite
just a few examples — has been blocked by partisan fights, advanced manufacturing has become an
issue that everyone can rally around.
As many
of us are paying attention to the
climate change negotiations in Doha, Qatar these next two weeks, I think it's important to keep in context
just how many moving pieces there are when it comes to crafting domestic policies that address a global
issue.
Reilly, a former astronaut, sidestepped other questions about the agency's mission, not
just those on
climate, and said he would wait to be confirmed before commenting on specific
issues under the banner
of USGS.
Interestingly enough, in the January 14, 2010,
issue of Nature, there is a review
of a book called
Climate Cover - Up, by James Hoggan and Richard Littlemore, which details what I've
just described to you.
It's
just amazing that, you know, you could capture that much information and it's interesting in the scientific perspective because what we are finding right now with
issues like
climate change and conservation is that we really need fine - grained samples from very large geographic areas to really understand the dynamics
of species range movements and how fragmentation is occurring and many biogeographic questions, and literally, the only way we can do this is through voluntary networks like this because it would cost billions and billions to send professionals out at that finer scale to understand it.
Just in case you were wondering why «The Sunday Telegraph» has devoted two whole pages over the last couple
of weeks to Monckton's amateur re-interpretation
of the data, rather than inviting somebody with a track record in
climate research to write about the
issue, I think I might be able to shed some light on the
issue.
Just one thing for now: the whole
issue of climate sensitivity (ie that which Monckton refers to as «lambda», helpfully eliminating any opportunity for readers to fact - check).
And when
climate scientists are forced to respond to the constant propagation
of misinformation on these settled
issues, it
just detracts from our investigation
of the legitimate, unresolved, important questions.
We are providing a 21st century approach to its observance not
just by recharging memory, but through an artistic reflection with a balanced affirmation
of Hispanic heritage and indigenous traditions for collaborative new routes
of expression from ancestral roots focused on the concerns
of UNESCO: Cultural Rapprochement, Biodiversity, Ocean Care and Seafaring,
Climate Change mitigation through sustainable energy, reforestation, gender equity and health
issues.
Gun violence,
climate change, abortion, voter fraud, and surveillance are
just a few
of the
issues addressed in Reyes's series
of fourteen Doomocracy scenarios.
But many young children are in danger
just from being exposed and breathing the air around them, bringing the
issue of climate change forward in everybody's minds.
Anthropogenic induced
climate heating is not the only mess, it's
just ONE
issue in a frightening chain
of cause and effect (called «causality»).
We see this all the time on
issues from
climate change to gun control, and in the recent examples
of Obamacare (+12 % approval but
just one vote shy
of Republican repeal) and the tax plan -LRB--14 % approval but passed by Republicans in Congress).
I have a number
of foreign papers bookmarked and I suggest others do the same, and not
just for
climate change
issues.
The other
issue is we must be very careful what «current data» is entered, and this holds true
of any field, not
just climate science.
I don't wish to imply that
climate scientists have not adequately considered these
issues;
just that clearer explanations
of these points would help those
of us outside the community understand the accuracy and limitations
of the models better.
But if the goal
of climate policy is to serve as a «Trojan horse» to get at other
issues, like sprawl and gridlock (among other causes), then there is a misalignment
of ends and means, which often leads to ineffective or
just bad policy.
Unless you understand the severity
of the
issue motivating these actions, I think it's easy for people to look at
climate change protests as
just another item on a long list
of pet
issues of environmentalists.
Despite strong talk from the Obama administration on
climate change — to be fair
just reengaging with the international community on the
issue and not being an utter obstruction is a major shift over the policy
of the
And
of course the sensitivity
issue is
just about the basic
climate response.
Climate change is not
just another pet
issue of the green movement.
And crucially, churches in the U.S. have
just begun to take up this
issue in big numbers, which they see as a moral
issue of not
just protecting God's Creation, but also not inflicting direct harm on helpless people around the world.A new coalition
of environmentalists, aid groups, and churches have been pivotal in changing the momentum for the new «
Climate Security Act» co-sponsored by Senator John Warner.
By the time we got to Copenhagen there were people who had mobilised in every country on the
issue of climate change, where the biggest successes involved people
just going out into communities and talking to each village by village, or college by college.
In this video, Stott raises the big
issue of «cosmic rays» and its contribution to
climate change, but then backs off and says he didn't say it was causing global warming and that it's
just a «hot topic»
of research.
It feels as if the narrative
of «how to communicate
climate issues» has gotten stuck in a room where no one is trying to figure out how to get out — there's
just a group
of people in the middle
of the room arguing about how, theoretically, they might get out.
The psychology
of risk perception also confronts us with the reality that
issues like
climate change
just don't ring our alarm bells.
Just in case you were wondering why «The Sunday Telegraph» has devoted two whole pages over the last couple
of weeks to Monckton's amateur re-interpretation
of the data, rather than inviting somebody with a track record in
climate research to write about the
issue, I think I might be able to shed some light on the
issue.
It's not surprising that the first substantive energy exchange between the two candidates dealt with gas prices, given — as a national poll by the University
of Texas
just found — that this is by far the most pressing energy
issue on voters» minds (to the consternation
of climate hawks).
It would be cool to see a wide collection
of maps covering many different
issues, not
just climate and food production, but, for instance, poverty and wealth, arms production and war, clothing production and leisure time, education levels, consumption, production, health, population growth and decline, movement
of immigrants, human rights, animal populations, housing ownership, housing starts, anything basically which can be measured in a visual map... not
just for the US but as global maps, collected on pages where you could drag them around to sit on top
of each other and try and make sense
of the various impacts...
perhaps the environmentally warm and fuzzy conceit
of climate change — about which we can really do nothing — is really
just a subconscious expression
of the much more stark and frightening former — and all too real
issue: PEAK OIL.
The
climate issue embodies this challenge
of balancing present and future costs more than
just about any other, many experts say.
Aspects
of his comment may be unwelcome to
just about everyone in one way or another, but I think it is worth noting that he says that the data
issues don't detract from clear evidence
of a long - term warming trend and that carbon dioxide is «a major
climate forcing» (along with many others):
We have huge environmental
issues to tackle;
climate change is
just one
of them.
I
just finished signing a petition
issued by the Union
of Concerned Scientists urging Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger to make sure California's new
climate plan against global warming is strong.
UPDATE:
just read an interview with
climate scientist Ken Caldeira which focuses on the
issue of geoengineering.
-LSB-...] For readers who are visiting this website because
of the China Daily op - ed, welcome! The Green Leap Forward is a blog about China's energy and environmental
issues, focusing mostly on energy,
climate, water and sometimes agro-food
issues. See the right panel for a newly assembled sampling
of 2008's top blog posts. If you are based in Beijing, or
just want to get connected to the energy and environmental community in Beijing, join the Beijing Energy Network.
We should be addressing the meanings that divide us on an
issue like this, because they divide us on lots
of things — not
just the use
of violence by individuals
of one race on those
of another, or even the use
of it by the police against private citizens, but also matters as diverse as whether
climate change is occurring or whether schools should vaccinate pre-adolescent girls against HPV.
How many
of those who accuse me
of bias have ever read and fully understood the statistical
issues behind
just a single, serious
climate paper?
Climate change isn't
just about the planet, writes environmental activist Leehi Yona, but is connected to an array
of issues spanning from transgender justice to racism to immigration reform.
Just as I am wary
of commenting on
climate science per se as opposed to the policy
issues related to it.
Just to reiterate, a careful analysis
of the scientific methodological
issues exposes most
of the politics
of Dr T's pronouncements, and draws into question his competence in this domain, and hence his right to be taken seriously as a political voice on matters
climate.
Tools for researchers, water managers, community organizers, journalists, and
just about anyone who is studying the
issues of freshwater resources,
climate change, environmental justice, and globalization.