Sentences with phrase «just lend me the money»

You can not analyze your bonds as you do stocks because you're not buying into the profits, you're just lending them money for a fixed interest rate.

In the case of bonds, as you are just lending money to the company or government, you are actually not becoming a part of it and hence the investment you made in terms of bond is not affected by the rise or fall in the company's value and at the end of the maturity date, you will receive back the amount you invested while purchasing the bond.

The banks can't help you much, they are just lending the money that don't belong to them.

Not exact matches

Crosby and Johnson are confident there's investor demand — just look at the flood of money onto marketplace lending platforms like LendingClub, Prosper and SoFi.

«Getting funding for a cannabis business presents very unique challenges because you can't just get an SBA, or small business loan, and banks are not going to lend money to you either,» Super Bowl champion and cannabis entrepreneur Marvin Washington told me during an interview for my book with Entrepreneur Media, Start Your Own Cannabis Business.

Since these lenders will be potentially be footing hundreds of thousands of dollars they don't lend money to just any individual.

The appraisal ultimately affects just how much a bank is willing to lend: Lenders generally won't loan you more money than what a home is worth.

I am sacked with a huge STUDENT AID LOAN and some of these car dealers are willing to lend me some money; it is obvious my success is to just pay on time now that I have a fine salary.

If this new legislation is passed, it will likely just require that banks hold onto more money for emergencies, in reserves, rather than actually separate deposits and lending activities from speculative ones.

For example, in one emergency lending program, the Fed put out $ 9 trillion and over two - thirds of the money went to just three institutions: Citigroup, Morgan Stanley and Merrill Lynch.

Why don't you lend Arsenal the money so they can compete with city and utd City have soent over a Billion and utd have always had money Some Arsenal fans are stupid beyond belief They just drop a name the.

(unfortunately banks do nt buy in to we will win the league for the next decade to give out money) from the cub before they lend then shed lots of cash, and this unfortunately leads to clubs putting up there ticket prices to reflect the cost of big progress, so people sometimes have to realize that the club has to find a way to make club grow, and if they do nt have deep pocketed owners then they have to pitch to the banks for a loan, like we did all those years ago an we are just over the worst of it now we have paid our dues and are now getting back among the big boys again.

The FSB also wants to see that the new «funding for lending» scheme gets cash to those firms that need it with a clear reporting process so that tangible evidence is given to show the money is being passed on to small firms and not just shoring up the banks.

It is action by the poorest, and not simply for them, which has led to the extraordinary success of the Living Wage Campaign, and which has driven on the Just Money campaign against exploitative lending over the last four years.

Another concern is that quantitative easing will be ineffective if instead of using the new money to lend to small businesses and individuals, banks just sit on the cash in order to increase their capital reserves.

They make money originating from lend initial client screening to play offense if you have asked Aren't you just having the BEST time dating, I was at dinner with a man I met online when he had one of those terrible choking fits that won't stop.

Will cities and communities continue to spend money on lending books though their libraries when they are relatively inexpensive to «rent» by individuals just like a DVD?

They also lend books just in the Kindle format and both companies make money off of advertising.

Just because someone is willing to lend you money does not mean you should borrow the money.

On the one hand we have central bankers in Europe and Japan lowering their lending rates into negative territory, which means they charge the major banks money just to hold their reserves overnight.

@TheEnvironmentalist: think of the other side of this proposal: would you lend money to someone you've just met without a demonstrated ability to repay?

Of course, it is unlikely any bank will raise your credit limit because you've already exceeded it and don't have any more money, as lending money to people who have just indicated that they will have trouble paying it back is bad for business.

We don't just lend hard money in Fresno — we offer loans in virtually any city within California, Arizona, and Minnesota.

No strict lending rules, no fancy credit scoring systems, just a large enough downpayment so they know they'll get their money back if they have to foreclose.

i couldnt get them too let me through the website my credit has been so badly damaged by my own mistakes that they wont lend to me i just need tthe money to pay off my debt and get a monthly payment im in the military and its guranteed they will get their money back through allotments i just need to get rid of my debt and fast

Meaning, if you're paying insurance premiums, some of that money is likely being used to invest through peer to peer lending sites - you're just not seeing any of the return.

Just like the banks make money from lending their money, you can now make money like a bank.

Just as they would be appalled if I were to do so if lending them money.

Just because the bank will lend you a certain amount of money doesn't mean you should take it.

All type of Account Overdraft Agreements charge an interest rate over the money lent, just like any loan or line of credit.

That leaves us with just a handful of lenders left in the industry to lend money if you have credit issues.

Hmm, maybe they're just really ticked off at the evil bastard capitalists who lent all that money that was simply pissed away?

Title loans are great lending options for those that have a less - than - perfect credit score, or those who just need their money now.

Traditional lending programs can take months to process; our hard money loans can often be distributed within just a few days.

I suppose this can be interpreted as just another subtle reminder that we are NOT lending money to individual borrowers.

Peer - to - peer lending is just like it sounds: you lend your money to others and they pay you back with interest.

Just as you can spread your own investments to manage risk, a mortgage scheme can manage risk by spreading the money it lends and invests between different loans, borrowers and investments.

The federal government does not lend money directly to home buyers — they just insure such loans.

«Just because a credit card company wants to lend you more money or increases your credit limit does not mean you can afford to [spend more],» says Lauren Zangardi Haynes, CFP ®, of Evolution Advisers in Midlothian, Virginia.

Since 2008, the Federal Reserve has held the federal funds rate (which banks use when lending money to one another) just above zero percent.

You're basically just lending the bank your money at 1 % so they can lend it back to you at 2 %, 3 % or more on your mortgage, line of credit, car loan and credit cards.

Just like you said for Ponzi schemes «the only source of the so - called interest on the money was the contributions of future investors», for fractional - reserve banking the source of interest is the future profit made by lending the investor's money - to the investors themselves!

Just like it sounds, peer - to - peer lending is the process of one person lending money to another person.

On the facts of these appeals, it seems reasonable to infer that recognizing interest as an expense would lead to a transfer of resources between classes of parties in which unsuccessful defendants are exposed to the risks of paying high interest rates designed to pay for the cost of lending money, not just to the successful party in the case but other plaintiffs who receive financing but may not recover moneys to pay for their loans...

That is, it requires a person to «lay out money on behalf of another in suits at law to recover a just right, and this may be done in respect of the poverty of the party; but if he lends money to promote and stir up suits, then he is a barrator».

That's just a function of the fact that they're lending you money by speculating on the future value of your home and your life expectancy.

If they have money sitting in a CD earning 0.3 percent, I've just basically said they should lend it to me instead.

But just by repeating these pitches often, you dramatically increase the odds of running into someone who may want to lend you money or sell you a house or is a great contractor or whatever.

The bank we work with just keeps lending us money... I think it helps that both my wife and I have good full time gigs.

just get rid of the brokers who just add layers to the system its the banks that lend the money at the end of the day who needs RMLO's anyway..