Sentences with phrase «just making sense of things»

Not exact matches

«Great perks (free food, free coffee bar rivals Starbucks, free juice bar, free ice cream bar, just free bars... I can go on), great energy in the company to get things done (motivated by a sense of how much of a difference the products make in the lives of people in earning their livelihood or taking it to the next level).

A crowdsourced delivery network for all kinds of things — not just groceries — makes sense for Instacart, another unicorn company, and one that's raised $ 274 million so far.

I was kind of like I said interested in gambling or at least speculating or figuring things out and then taking a calculated gamble and what they were telling me was don't try, there were saying that no one can beat the market and the stock prices are efficient and just through simple observation looking at the newspaper and they used to have the 52 - week high low prices in the newspaper, it seemed unreasonable that you know the fair price was 51 day and eight months later, it was 120, and that was pretty much every stock had that kind of range every year and it didn't make sense to me that the fundamentals of the underlying businesses were actually changing that much.

Authentic leaders start with a strong sense of values, and some deep beliefs in their mission and purpose, but just as importantly, they are able to personally inspire and build trusting relationships with the people around them who can make things happen in the business.

Charlie Munger: Well both Berkshire and the Daily Journal have our own ways of doing things, and we just try and do whatever makes sense.

Some of us just do it because it makes sense, feels good and is the compassionate thing to do.

Once you strip away the mysticism of (F) aith and begin to contemplate (f) aith things just make more sense.

By what we see around us in the creation, for our Creator, made us to see in color, not just black and white, to have a series of senses that allow us to thoroughly enjoy life, such as the capacity to feel very minute things with our fingertips.

And of course, it makes the best sense with no gods at all, that things just happen.

So, you're assertion that there «things are getting worse» makes no sense, just go look at the web site I mentioned, they list all 21,814 acts of terrorism in the past 12 years.

lol, yes clay i am an atheist... i created the sun whorshipping thing to have argument against religion from a religious stand point... however, the sun makes more sense then something you can't see or feel — the sun also gives free energy... your god once did that for the jews, my gives it to the human race as well as everything else on the planet, fuk even the planet is nothing without the sun... but back to your point — yes it is very hypocritical of me, AND thats the point, every religious person i have ever met has and on a constant basis broken the tenets of there faith without regard for there souls — it seems to only be the person's conscience that dictates what is right and wrong... the belief in a god figure is just because its tradition to and plus every else believes so its always to be part of the group instead of an outsider — that is sadly human nature to be part of the group.

When a believer bit.ches and moans about how if gay marriage is legalized, next is polygamy, in.cest and beastiality, (because for some reason all of those things are related) and we reject that because 1) beastiality is stupid because we're talking about two consenting adults 2) Polygamy is not really immoral but just incredibly tricky legally to design docu.ments that would make sense and 3) inc.est has some scientific ramifications and most of us can agree that as far as icky se.xual stuff goes, that ones a doozy.

And if someone comes to a different conclusion after reading the bible, like I have, then they just need to believe in god first, then they'll be able to make sense of the thing that shows god right?

Not control the mood, but set it and really be more of an intimate thing where everybody is just kind of in one place and it made a lot of sense to me when they told me about it.

The same God is the author of our natural intellect as well as revelation, as classical Catholic theology so often reminds us, so we should not be surprised if what the Church teaches makes wonderful sense also just from a purely natural point of view and people end up doing what the Church recommends, not because she recommends it, but just because it is the most sensible thing to do.

«We recognise that just as all truth rests in the Word of God, through whom all things were made and through Whom all thing will come to their completion, so too the construction of a true human ecology can only be achieved in relationship to the Word -LSB-...] we can see and sense the echoing of that eternally spoken Word in so much of the created world around us -LSB-... which Word is] expressed in all those actions and events which make up the history of salvation -LSB-...] we recognise most centrally that this eternal Word of God, in whom all things makes sense, finds flesh in the person of Jesus of Nazareth who then becomes its fullest expression and true presence in the world -LSB-...] the centre of true human ecology is the person of Christ.»

His Son didn't just come to talk about sheep and goats, although in that agrarian / pastoral area, that WOULD make sense to use parables and comparisons to things that the people would KNOW as opposed to things they've never heard of, don't you think?

I just couldn't square all the «just believe» and «faith is believing in things you can't see, touch, taste, hear, smell, or rationally make sense of...» crap in my head.

Since then, my frustration has faded somewhat, and I've come to terms with the fact that perhaps they weren't the end of the world, they just weren't the thing I was looking for: they were more of a limp white bread bun — the kind so easily purchased at a store under any generic brand, it made little sense to eek them out at home — and I wanted something a little more moist and rich.

To be fair, our fit players could really do with a rest after playing four matches in just 11 days so it certainly makes sense to ignore an unimportant match in the great scheme of things.

just reading around and all if not most rags are saying our net spend is # 46 million how can they tell that when they do nt even know what our real budget is if it was # 100 million then we are in profit by quite a bit i do nt really know what they base there assumptions on this is where you could do with swiss ramble to dissect what really was spent from what i could see most of our 5 transfers were covered by out goings and c / l monies earned debuchy - vela deal, chambers - vermalen deal, ospina - cesc and miquel deals sanchez c / l monies and other monies recovered from wages and old installment based deals this is the same with welbeck i would imagine if not then poldolski will be sold in jan to cover this as i think he was going to be sold and this would have covered welbecks transfer more or less also and people do nt always realize that arsenal have money coming in from more than one source to cover transfers not just puma and emirates deals we have property arm of the club which makes money for transfers also outstanding debts we are owed of old transfers we receive each year on song cesc maybe van persie and all other structured deals in installment payments sales we just flogged miquel as an example and all the monies from released wages and youths sold its a bit to complex to just say we have a net spend of xyz when arsenal do nt even make the budget public so they have no starting point from which to go from i bet you we have broke even or even made a slight profit as we are self sustaining it would make sense that we can break even or at least make the net spend under # 10 million each year at least screw then all we are the arsenal we do thing our way

It makes sense for things like American Football where you play so few games there will undoubtedly be ties in a lot of the years, but when you are already having a playoff, to add another is just silly.

No matter how you slice it, this admission is reason enough for termination of both Wenger and Gazidis... this owner, who has personally poisoned every major sporting organization he currently owns in North America (Rams, Avalanche & Nuggets), has no regard for the concerns of the fans, just ask anyone in St. Louis, home of the once - vaunted «Greatest Show on Earth»... they had to endure numerous losing campaigns under his reign, before suffering the ultimate humiliation, as he moved the team to Los Angeles to quench his seemingly unending financial thirst... do you think it's a coincidence that ever since his arrival both Wenger and Gazidis have made grand claims each and every May to secure season ticket sales then fail to live up to the billing... they will do anything to make money except the very things that would make the most sense from a soccer perspective: buying a world - class striker since RVP, a Viera - like boss in the midfield and a dominant, physical CB in the mold of Adams or Sol... let's face it, they didn't even try

Of course, without a single strong newcomer to the ballot, many of the holdovers gained support, which doesn't make sense because their stats didn't get better but that's just how the electorate does thingOf course, without a single strong newcomer to the ballot, many of the holdovers gained support, which doesn't make sense because their stats didn't get better but that's just how the electorate does thingof the holdovers gained support, which doesn't make sense because their stats didn't get better but that's just how the electorate does things.

It is not down to Arsenal just to buy a player... the selling club has to a) want to sell b) agree a price and c) ensure they have someone else to replace who they are selling Additionally because of FFP and Home - Grown rules it does nt make sense to buy all your players and then suddenly you could get 2 - 3 major injuries and have to buy someone else but then cant because you have no monies or might have to sell someone to be able to do so So many people saying negative things and that we should just go and buy and yet at the same time why spend so much on someone when we could have got somebody else!

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

So here's the thing — it doesn't make sense to commit to players just because of their nationality (as Arsenal did with that PR stunt five or so years ago).

Although it will be incredibly difficult to ever match his contributions on the pitch, it's vitally important for a former club legend, like Henry, to publicly address his concerns regarding the direction of this club... regardless of those who still feel that Henry has some sort of agenda due to the backlash he received following earlier comments he made on air regarding Arsenal, he has an intimate understanding of the game, he knows the fans are being hosed and he feels some sense of obligation, both professionally and personally, to tell it like he sees it... much like I've continually expressed over the last couple months, this team isn't evolving under this current ownership / management team... instead we are currently experiencing a «stagnant» phase in our club's storied history... a fact that can't be hidden by simply changing the formation or bringing in one or two individuals... this team needs fundamental change in the way it conducts business both on and off the pitch or it will continue to slowly devolve into a second tier club... regardless of the euphoria surrounding our escape act on Friday evening, as it stands, this club is more likely to be fighting for a Europa League spot for the foreseeable future than a top 4 finish... we can't hope for the failures of others to secure our place in the top 4, we need to be the manufacturers of our own success by doing whatever is necessary to evolve as an organization... if Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke can't take the necessary steps following the debacle they manufactured last season, their removal is imperative for our future success... unfortunately, I strongly believe that either they don't know how to proceed in the present economic climate or they are unwilling to do whatever it takes to turn this ship around... just look at the current state of our squad, none of our world class players are under contract beyond this season, we have a ridiculous wage bill considering the results, we can't sell our deadwood because we've mismanaged our personnel decisions and contractual obligations, we haven't properly cultivated our younger talent and we might have become one of the worst clubs ever when it comes to way we handle our transfer business, which under Dein was one of our greatest assets... it's time to get things right!!!

I fail to see the sense in a fair bit of what he does — but being the charitable sort I give him more benefit of the doubt than maybe he is entitled to because I just know that every decision he has made or has not made has far more complexity to it and involves things that will probably remain unknown outside of the AFC board room for ever.

That was the crux of it (though as with most things, it expanded), it just makes sense that it could lead to a grudge.

We'll just focus on ourselves and the main thing for us will be re-evaluating this and making sense of it before moving forwards.

Some things in life just don't seem to make sense when you analyse them in the cold light of day.

I think that, regardless of whether you do the every -2-hours thing or just do solids + liquids all at once, you're right - it doesn't make sense that a 6 month old would need to eat more often than a newborn, and it does make sense to go on as you have been going on.

It just makes sense to me that it might be in an insurance provider's best interest to do that sort of thing too, you know?

Until, that is, you learn to let go of that whole «making sense» thing and just roll with whatever seemingly benign circumstance happens to turn your kid into a raging lunatic on any given day.

And I think I've talked about this in a recent Preggie Pals episode, is that, when I am nursing my son, I feel a sense of calmness, you know, I am able to reconnect and things make more sense and I realize all the little things that I'm doing in my day - to - day life, aren't nearly as important as just re-focusing on my family and it's a sense of peace and calmness that I can't get from taking a bubble bath....

For us, a family bed made plenty of sense when it was just the three of us, but having another baby has made things a little more flexible.

Most of us give in (eventually) to the confusion and strangeness and just wait it out until things start to make more sense and we refocus into improved versions of ourselves — our old wonderful selves, but with a harder core and softer edges.

By Danny Thomas I haven't written in a really long time I've been «too busy living life» Or something... The thing I have to get into my stubborn or lazy brain Is that, for me writing is part of living life So being too busy to do it Just doesn't make sense But hell I've -LSB-...]

It makes so much sense because it kind of just goes back to what we were saying earlier about how it's probably in all of us that we have an idealistic view of the family experience and like gosh, I don't know if I really want to talk about it like it being hard or things happening to my moods

To me, the way things were when I was growing up seemed pretty normal and really just made a lot of sense to me!

He has every right to do so but, I think his ideas, which adopt a lot of the Washington Republican ideas like the Ryan budget that would slash Medicaid and other things we depend on in New York just don't make sense for our state,» says Maloney.

«It wasn't just that he could cite the papers, but he could synthesize things — he could take six papers and put them all together to make sense out of them, which is [a skill] that takes a long time to develop,» Austad says.

It's nice for us to be able to categorize things and try to make sense of it, but there's a deeper level at which species — that's just a convenient thing, you know, all these things, these names we put on things are not the real description of what's going on.

That is just our own way of making sense of things.

That idea makes sense, given that groundedness is one of the starting points of most any meditation practice, though I found it gave me yet one more thing to look at: undulating waves throwing flecks of golden sun, plus a pair of nicely tanned legs and muscular pecs, just below my line of sight.

So, whereas if somebody has high cortisol, let's just say be 15 different things, by knowing what the ACTH is, and that narrows down that list of 15 considerably, it that makes sense?

I was just recently diagnosed w Hashimoto's two days ago after 17 years of misdiagnosis and have been voraciously reading through your Hashi protocol book which has really made things click and finally make sense!

So, when this is open, you experience this almost like old soul sense of wisdom of like things are just going to work out, and I don't need to go through life kicking, and pushing, and screaming and trying to make things work.

To me, it just makes sense to get all the phytonutrients we can, and that means lots of veggies, berries, fruits, and other growing things.