Sentences with phrase «just making the case for»

The Turn 10 guy is just making a case for not buying a Xbox.

Many understandably want to make the case that's not true, but fairly straightforward analysis shows they are just making the case for how passionately they wish it were not true.

You just made the case for those who are skeptical of anthropomorphic climate change.

Not exact matches

«Well, let me just say Mr. President, you made the case for the tax bill,» Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said.

Look to the case of Tim Romero, a Tokyo - headquartered entrepreneur who, earlier this summer, «gave up» and closed ContractBeast, a startup that produced software for people who make software, when it hadn't gained a significant following after just seven months in business.

For instance: If you make custom cellphone cases you could include it in a round - up titled, «12 Must - Have Items For The Techie In The Family» and your case is just one of the twelve gorgeous gizmos.

Groups including the Electronic Frontier Foundation have been making precisely that case for years, pointing out as early as 2005 that EULAs force users to give up not just control of their data, but many other legal rights.

Just last week McDonald's CEO Don Thompson made the case for more time to turnaround the troubled company during his year - end earnings calls.

Keller, who uncannily made the business case for Winnipeg's reentry into the NHL before events proved him right, says it's not just fan support but also the economics that are in place for more Canadian franchises.

Whatever the case, Tahari is not alone when it comes to fashion figures who made headlines for more than just their silhouettes.

«And in example after example, radical notion after radical notion, Jay and Shel don't just make the assertion about something that challenges everything we thought we knew about marketing — they give readers chapter - and - verse examples that make the case for one simple concept after another that... well, could just revolutionize everything.

«Putting progressive elements into trade deals — labour protections, environmental protections — actually helps us make the case for trade and reassure people that the benefits of trade will be distributed more fairly and not just to the small number of people who've always benefited from it in the past.»

You can certainly make the case that a «business» has assets and thus value so it SHOULD be included, just like our cars or even homes for that matter (which some people also don't believe should go in there since you need one to live in), but for me it's just too unstable to be accounted for on an ongoing basis.

China and Singapore, by the way, are nondemocratic capitalistic societies, and so it's actually easier for those types of governments to make wholesale change than it is in our case, so they can make the types of systems that we've been talking about, or they could decide to mirror Singapore or whatever, and everybody just kind of has to take it.

In a 2006 report, Death by a Thousand Cuts, the Pembina Institute makes the case for the importance of considering not just the mined disturbance, but also the disturbance from in situ production, pipelines, seismic exploration cut lines, etc..

As well as making the case for index funds, Buffett's new letter stresses that your behaviour as an investor is just as important as how you invest.

But now Facebook is making the case for marketers to do just that.

Factor in what might be high - single - digit business growth over the next year, as well as what's currently a yield of just over 2.25 %, and you could easily make a case for what might be a total return of ~ 25 % for 2018.

It's his same old nonsense, and fails to make any case for his crazy god beliefs, just as it did previously.

Well it is true that some people seek sorcerers to implement Jinn that are satanic demons into mankind or his house or his business to finish him or make his life miserable or to stop flow of his business income... In such case it is either you are religious enough and say your prayers often then it becomes hard for this to harm you or otherwise you need to find some one who practice exorcism to remove this evil... But many are just pretending to be good at it and help you not but squeeze money out of you with tales and stories... There is another type of possessions and that is not through a sorcerer but directly by coincidence what man is at his weakest moments and those weakest moments for a possessions are when you come through a great fear or when cry or laugh loudly in hysteria, or during a certain moment of mating... or even when sneezing loudly... That's why there are prayers to be said on daily basis to guard you from such things and specially if passing haunted places such as deserted houses but most evil ones are residents of public toilets and market places... Some of them even would claim that you have made a wrong action by which you have killed a dear one to them and for that they have possessed you and that is mostly night time such as throwing a cigaret butt to a dark place or stepping killing an insect or even an animal at night which could have been one of them or possessed by one of them... So this is true thing happening to many who suffer unexplainable illnesses or sufferings which could look like mental illness that comes and goes as pleased...

Rather than just make a case against emergence, DeYoung and Kluck make a case for doctrine, for conviction, and they do so with an authenticity that would make any emergent devotee proud.

I just wish to make the case for integration and not rupture with the contents of the perennial philosophy.

Please note that Baer, Capizzi, and other proponents of just war doctrine are not making a case for any specific use of lethal power.

Forcing the case for this kind of living moral alternative into the narrow confines of an argument that is just about religion and liberty makes the treasure we seek to protect seem smaller and less significant than it truly is.

I feel that there is a case to be made for those who leave a church because that church is moving forward and changing to meet the demands of a changing society and some people just don't like it!

In the case of these Catholic priests who did just that, they should be made to stand before a judge and jury for thier actions.

There is knowledge to be gained by such studies, of course, but it hardly makes for the sort of case embryo - research advocates were advancing just a few years ago — with its miracle cures and treatments for the untreatable.

So, I just wanted find a coherent discourse on the subject making the case for Thursday.

Just a brief note to start a conversation about the case of the baker, Jack Phillips, who refused to make a wedding cake for a gay couple who had been married in Massachusetts and wanted to celebrate with a party in Colorado.

I don't think they were comparing their diverse population through similar practices, they were simply saying that, for instance, some atheists just say they are atheists to themselves, while others might go out and pronounce it to the world and strongly make there case to others in hopes of converting people.

Kevin: It is an outrage for a fellow Christian to justify their faith by essentially saying it is a safety net... either you believe or you don't... you are only doing yourself and everyone else a disservice by saying that you believe just in case there is a heaven you want to make sure you get in.

While granting that there's a lot of church - pushing going around that's creepy, goofy, and just downright wrong, what is it you think the author of Hebrews is doing when he makes a case for continuing in public worship and association with God's people?

So for example, in my case and that of other persons whose minds dissociate when we engage in intense / deep spiritual practices like intense / deep prayer, meditation, fasting etc and we hear voices, hallucinate, see visions, experience thought insertions, automatic channelling just like a spirit medium as well as other psychic phenomena (clairvoyance etc), and the mind dissociation makes some persons mentally and emotionally unstable; our minds enter an altered state of consciousness just like those of the Buddhist monks but in our case the altered state of our brains results in psychotic and psychic symptoms being induced (interestingly, some persons who are ignorant of how the human brain functions chalk up these experiences to demonic attack)......... are these psychotic, psychic experiences which persons like myself experience a gift from God as well?

Just makes my case stronger for my belief in the One true God.

Can we make a case for seeing the angels in God's initial plan of creation not just as messengers but as in some way active agents with a specific role in the development of the evolutionary process, a role which he did not withdraw from those who rebelled, in the same way that he does not always or instantly remove bad rulers who affect the development of the historical process?

Jeremy i am surprised you never countered my argument Up till now the above view has been my understanding however things change when the holy spirit speaks.He amazes me because its always new never old and it reveals why we often misunderstand scripture in the case of the woman caught in adultery.We see how she was condemned to die and by the grace of God Jesus came to her rescue that seems familar to all of us then when they were alone he said to her Go and sin no more.This is the point we misunderstand prior to there meeting it was all about her death when she encountered Jesus something incredible happened he turned a death situation into life situation so from our background as sinners we still in our thinking and understanding dwell in the darkness our minds are closed to the truth.In effect what Jesus was saying to her and us is chose life and do nt look back that is what he meant and that is the walk we need to live for him.That to me was a revelation it was always there but hidden.Does it change that we need discipline in the church that we need rules and guidelines for our actions no we still need those things.But does it change how we view non believers and even ourselves definitely its not about sin but its all about choosing life and living.He also revealed some other interesting things on salvation so i might mention those on the once saved always saved discussion.Jeremy just want to say i really appreciate your website because i have not really discussed issues like this and it really is making me press in to the Lord for answers to some of those really difficult questions.regards brentnz

Also if anyone wants to take issue, just for fun see if you can make your case from that text, rather than citing others.

In every case these latter kinds of reflexive relationships make for systems in which things and substances endure through their relationship to their own attributes and through their interactions, just as, conversely, the enduring existence of things and substances supports the change of attributes and the interactions of substances.

Now, if it is possible for A to completely determine all of the activities of B even in the case where B is making maximum effort to determine its activities for itself, then whether or not A does in fact do so, there is at least a possible world (W) in which A does just that.

The case for that judgment is made at length in Shattered: Inside Hillary Clinton's Doomed Campaign, by Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes, which I had just read on a long flight and which has had tout le Washington in a tizzy for weeks.

This seems much more like a case of someone with real issues who is so pathetically desperate for attention that they use multiple names and make mindless statements just to rile people up.

I am disappointed that no one has significantly challenged the case I made for the moral significance of war in Against the Nations — except for Paul Ramsey in his wonderful book Speak Up for Just War or Pacifism.

None the less, if it should turn out that one can be a Christian without holding firmly to personal persistence beyond death, this is significant; and since, as I have just been saying, I think that such is indeed the case, I believe that nobody ought to require acceptance of some variety of personal persistence as a pre-requisite for a welcome into the Christian community which is grounded on that faith in God in Jesus Christ which the community exists to make available to men and women in every age.

Just because conduct is not determined by unified intelligible basic principles, but is regulated by the formal authority of the Law, the task of the scribe is to «make a fence around the Torah,» that is, by endless acute deductions from Scripture to find rules for cases not foreseen in the Law, which nevertheless confront men in their present life.

But you are correct that the actual case / crime only entails the actual struggle, and by that point it was just two dumb - dumbs in a fight, and the lack of evidence is what really made acquittal the only choice for the jury.

I don't recall making it specifically for this food holiday, or if I just had a hankering for garlic fries, but whatever the case, I'm a big fan of this recipe.

Not sure anyone will read this comment all the way at the bottom, but just in case... I made this recipe once but didn't care for the mozzarella, so this time I substituted feta.

Made from high - quality greaseproof paper these large cupcake and muffin cases are just right for bakers creating tempting treats for bigger appetites at celebration parties and for special afternoon teas.

But you could make a case that any guy called «Pepper Joe» just may take his love for hot peppers to an extreme.

I just want to make absolutely sure before moving forward this way, but I am fully on board with supplementing (I'm preparing for the worst - case scenario as I return to work within a week) with goat's milk formula.