Sentences with phrase «just mean rate»

And wherever we can get the client the best deal and by best deal I don't just mean rate, I mean in terms of what actually can be done to help them in their situation?

Not exact matches

While the high level of existing debt means rate hikes will have a stronger impact in cooling demand than they did in previous years, it is still too soon to know just how much of an effect the bank's three rate hikes have had, Poloz said.
However, just because new tools and strategies have arrived, it doesn't necessarily mean that more established advertising methods can no longer turn heads and secure decent conversion rates.
Just because the Fed raises rates doesn't necessarily mean that will happen uniformity, and I think that's important for your viewers to realize.
Because the New York metro area — including all five boroughs, not just super-expensive Manhattan — has a huge population and a relatively high vacancy rate, an influx of even 50,000 new workers wouldn't mean much in the greater scheme of things.
The «big banks» out there — Bank of America, Chase, Citibank, and Wells Fargo, to name a few — usually offer an interest rate of 0.01 %, meaning your savings just sit there, growing by a negligible amount.
It is important to keep in mind that low for longer is stimulative, and that just because Poloz felt the need to signal that lower interest rates are a possibility, doesn't mean they are an inevitability.
Whether you're buying time on cable systems or individual stations, you can save money by purchasing «broad rotators,» which means your spots may run anytime during entire dayparts, not just within specific, higher - rated shows.
«Of course that doesn't mean violence has disappeared, just that it occurs at lesser rates than it used to.»
After a median four years of post-study follow - up, those in the least sedentary quartile (sitting a mean 649 minutes a day in typically 6.5 - minute bouts) had a dramatically lower rate of death from all causes than those in the most sedentary group (835 minutes at rest, in periods of relative motionless averaging just under 20 minutes each).
Because low - risk investments return roughly 20 % on average in a country with 20 % nominal GDP growth, financial repression means that the benefits of growth are unfairly distributed between savers (who get just the deposit rate, say 3 %), banks, who get the spread between the lending and the deposit rate (say 3.5 %) and the borrower, who gets everything else (13.5 % in this case, assuming he takes little risk — even more if he takes risk).
It's just above 2 percent (the Fed's target rate), meaning investors expect inflation to average a little over 2 percent between December of 2021 and December of 2026.
I mean I do not fully get the statement «a year of 2 % NGDP growth actually just brings you back to the natural rate, back to macroeconomic equilibrium» as I think targeting the change (0 %) here seems to be enough to tame the shock slowly without AD deficiency?
This means you could expect a 1 % rise in interest rates to lead to something approaching a 17.1 % decline in TLT prices, but just a 7.6 % fall in the IEF price (this doesn't include the income earned on these funds).
Just because interest rates are at 1.5 % doesn't mean we like an investment that yields 2 - 3 %.
Keep in mind that just because a lender offers you a lower interest rate than you currently pay on your existing student loans doesn't mean your monthly payment will also be lower.
But just because most banks won't be offering higher savings rates doesn't mean they aren't out there.
For Ontario in particular, he estimated, that means an annualized rate of real GDP growth of just 1.7 per cent for 10 years.
On its Web site, the VA warns consumers that just because VA mortgages are government - backed doesn't mean the government sets their interest rates or costs.
With most virtual currencies having a reliable issuance rate and a fixed total supply, they are meant to be anti-inflationary, just like gold (since a country can't decide to simply print more).
That means you can get most or all your closing costs paid for, and still have the full - closing - cost loan rate from just two years ago.
A low rate of return is significant not just because it means less growth, but because it means more vulnerability to inflation.
So there are lots of those long - term factors, demographics, aging population, global competition that mean that long - term interest rates may not rise at the same level, but one can't help but feel that we have seen six, seven years and in some cases, 10 years now post global financial crisis of near - zero interest rates and it's just, I suspect, there are a lot of market practitioners have gotten used to that idea and haven't really gotten their heads around the fact that we are still seeing Fed governors suggesting we have got one more rate increase this year and potentially two or three coming out next year.
That means the total rate is just over 2 %.
This means that the company has strong reviews and ratings that extend beyond just renters insurance, resulting in a strong reputation.
That might mean he keeps raising rates too long into an economic slowdown, but it could just as easily mean he doesn't increase quickly enough in a dramatic economic uptick.
Actually, y / y commercial & industrial loan growth peaked in early 2015 already, not just «last December»... but lettuce not quibble (Pritchard likely meant to refer to total commercial bank credit, the growth rate of which reached an interim peak in late 2016 — shown further below).
That means that if you have variable - rate credit card or private student loan debt, your rate just went up.
The fixed - income duration remained flat at just over two years, meaning that this portion of the portfolio should have little sensitivity to interest - rate movement.
To put a stop to that, Congress just has to amend the law to make the «general level of short - term rates» mean what it was originally supposed to mean, to wit: the level of any of several reasonably comparable short - term market rates.
That means it's important to not shrug off talk of higher rates as just a pipe dream, and then get caught holding the bag if and when they transpire.
some of you atheists are still talking... I can hear you... the little patter of your heart as it increases in rate because you are so ticked off at those mean «ol believers whom you hate so much you just have to put all your time into the CNN posts dealing with faith and God... You are so predictable... blather on without me though, I have to go get my sons from practice, so you will have to spew your hate on those left behind... Merry Christmas!
Just because we don't yet know doesn't mean some sky fairy did it... Also why would a deity make the universe rate of expansion such that we could never travel to the end of it?
Of course this means their tax rates are very high, but for ex, EVERY working person can send their kids to gov childcare, not just the poor.
Just because CNN is too ratings - whipped to risk offending ANYONE, doesn't mean that all ideas actually do deserve equal respect.
It's like KJ just picks out random numbers or does not realise how dire a 5.5 rating means.
To be fair because these players flopped in their respective clubs does not necessarily mean Te would have flopped at Arsenal because if you want to use such harebrained and short - sighted analogy then you can blame Wenger for the many many players hw could have signed who later turned out world class later, CR7, Zlatan just to mention 2...... like it or lump it Wenger is overcautious and indecisive in the transfer market nowadays...... you win some and lose some, no manager in the world can boast a 100 % success rate when buying players...... I know the jury is still out on Martial but personally I respect LVG's courage, conviction and decisiveness in identifying him and going al out to get him, Wenger need to show such attributes more!!!!
Don't get get wrong, i'm just as frustrated with him as everyone else but a 1 for a rating means that he literally did everything wrong, not just the one mistake.
Just because you don't rate them doesn't mean they don't earn the right to be taken serious on the pitch... Seems you're going to be angry for a few more years there dude.
Wake up and smell the f ****** coffee... Any team with mert flamini Ramsey Gibbs Monreal arteta giroud podolski will never and I mean in a million years never going to be top notch throw the delusional one in to manage and it's another ten years of nothing... If he was a decent human being he would resign tomorrow sadly he is just a third rate cheese eating surrender monkey who believes there is no alternative... A once serious club run by a corporate clique and this idiot... Lowest point in thirty year history of following arsenal
Opponents averaged just 10.5 yards per completion, meaning they were forced to either remain extremely patient or lean on a run game that moved backwards a decent amount (Fresno was 32nd in stuff rate, run stops at or behind the line).
yeah i know what you mean it might just be a case of moving chambers (wenger might just get another c / h in or promote hayden / o» connor to c / h) to d / m along side le coq and one thing i have noticed i the rate at which young bielik is propelling up the youth team a month ago he was with under 18's completely skipped the under 19's straight to under 21s so he will be ready for first team in the summer by the looks of things so we might not be needing another d / m but i would keep and eye out for a freebee khedira though if its just wages we have to pay wenger might like that experience he needs in the big games
They are entirely different things and the silly use of «hate» when meaning someone does not rate or like somone is just daft.
I just did a simple mean / SD analysis of NL teams with comparable scoring rates to see if the SDs look different.
I mean I'm not blaming him for being injured but we all know he didn't play also because he was just playing poorly and he's missing 1v1s at an alarming rate
Going 3 - 4 in one - possession games meant the Wolverines were just a few plays from either 4 - 8 or 11 - 1, but despite a total collapse late, UM still ranked just 36th in the F / + ratings.
Let's get the facts straight here.He never demanded # 400,000 a week.All that is just media talk.However, I support your point of the fact that him going does not mean disaster.We've survived with far better players leaving you know.If Arsenal had replaced Van Persie the season he left we would've challenged them for the title that season.However, at that time we were financially poor and had to settle for some second rate players.Now we are in a better financial position and I expect us to be more ambitious and that involves trying as much as possible to replace any player who leaves.This doom prediction doesn't show the character of a top club.Even Chelsea won't behave like how we do if they lost Hazard.I hate the way Arsenal allows players to treat it.I actually thought only smaller clubs behaved that way.
At any rate who cares if Le Coq ai nt going to the euro's it does nt affect us, it also worth noting that the season ticket letters go out in a few weeks wich means we will be linked to every player under the sun until that time is done and then we'll end up with noone new cos as Wenger said last season «there are no available players out there who are better than what we have» nice play on words there the key word being «Available» No one is available unless its on a freeand that means they are too old or are sh!t Wenger just wont spend the money that we do have but he has too if he wants to win anything worth a damn
He was so passionate about beating Spuds, and on his DVD states just how much it means to him that he never lost to them in his time at Arsenal.Fast forward to now, and you've got c ** ts like Sagna saying that «It doesn't matter more if we beat Spuds» during the week, and a second - rate team throwing away a two - goal lead as if it doesn't really matter.Fans say that foreigners can't understand the passion of a local rivalry, but TH14 (and his co-horts) proved that utterly wrong.
The most important thing to keep in mind is that your child is going to develop at his or her own rate and that it doesn't mean there's anything wrong with your baby just because he or she isn't interested in drinking from a bottle just yet.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z