Sentences with phrase «just opinion based»

But the 3C is just his opinion based on the fact that most models come up with that value.

But this is just my opinion based on what I thought I knew.

There are lots of apps, and these are just my opinion based on what I've used with my students or successfully tested.

That is why this article is just an opinion based on the experience of working in the dating industry for considerable time, having lots of female friends looking for a foreign spouse, personally trying this, collecting the public opinion, having some general observation in the society and studying what mass media and Internet presents about this topic.

Which is why I've come to this conclusion of colours however it is just my opinion based on my collection of clothes, I'm not in any way saying all of these colours will be perfect for you but I'm pretty certain at least a couple will be.

Our choice doesn't mean we are right, this is just our opinion based on the results of our tests.

As for the «greatet christians you know», It's just opinion based.

They publish it with a reference to our client, it goes viral, we're all over google alerts and chase up every site that mentions it to let them know our client delivered the idea, whether it be an infographic, data set or just opinion based.

Just my opinions based on my moderate experience.

Clearly Good E-Reader hasn't been privy to all the publishing sales data out there so maybe add a caveat next time that states that these are just your opinions based on the incomplete information provided, then, list the statistics outlets... Then you might seem to be more credible and your opinion more valuable.

Not exact matches

But it's likely that the information is just based on the account manager's opinion.

Blogger in Chief Arianna Huffington launched her New York City — based news and opinion website just as what she calls «the national conversation» was moving online.

It doesn't matter how many people choose to believe in concepts based on faith, that concept is still just an opinion until it is supported with verifiable evidence.

I just still feel everyone has a right to their own opinion, but that opinion needs to be based off of FULLY educating themselves on this topic.

The danger is not just that religion and religiously based opinions are being privatized, as Franck points out.

we unfortunately, do not take into consideration the detail of each side ad rather present our opinion which is pragmatically just our consensus based on hear - say, exaggeration and the media.

Anything else is just strong opinion based on heresay, stories handed down thru time, and such.

«Now there is no indication that such an opinion is automatically incorrect, but as far as empirical evidence is concerned, that opinion is just that, an opinion, and it is no more solidly based than those who are of the opinion that there is a God who does not want to be made known but would rather have us develop faith»

I suspect that there was a real person or real persons that the myth of Jesus was based upon, but that's just my opinion.

Your opinions are based on any real facts but just homophobic fear.

If its just man giving their opinion about God here and there, sometimes they're right, sometimes they're wrong, what basis would we have to trust the what the NT says about anything, including Jesus Himself?

In my opinion, the only reason the male bastion of the clergy holds the scriptural position that it does is to protect the power base, a very human trait for a very human group, and quite unChirstian — but I'm just sayin»

(James 2:26) This is why I speak to people about the Bible, to show them just what the Bible teaches so that they can conform their lives to the Bible and make necessary changes to be real Christians based on the Bible, not based on what some man's opinion.

@david johson your long response offers no proof of anything, opinions and personal interpretation are not «proof «you admitted as much -LRB-, the old i can't prove a negative) but you impressed the heck out of martin t (not particularly difficult on that, as he appears to thrive on any bs that seems to support his «position») Just a side bar Santa does exist, or rather did, Saint Nicholas, Didn't know him personally and I don't think he was anything like the «Coke» version, but the persona is supposedly based on an actual person.

Maybe instead of just barraging people with personal opinions — typically based on nothing but our personal viewpoint — we should seek some expert advice on the issue.

«When old acquaintances said that he had no religion they based their opinion on such remarks as that the God, of whom he had just been speaking solemnly, «was not a person.»

Well, you have nothing to basis you ways off of, it's just your opinion.

Why did they spend all their power to defame Ms. California's image just because she said her opinion, which happened to be a Christian - based opinion?

Scientists have been able to provide evidence for the Big Bang Theory, but not the singularity itself that the «big bang» spawned from... so Hawking's assumptions, are just that, assumptions and opinions... and he does not, as you say «tell the truth» based on a proven, factual basis.

This is just your prejudice opinion that is not based on any real facts.

This article just goes to show that everyone can have an opinion, no matter how wrong or based in fallicious reasoning it is, as this author has just demonstrated.

That is not to say there shouldn't be Christian or other religious values present but it is to say that people shouldn't be conned and public opinion shouldn't be manipulated by claims of righteous values — as we have seen, it is just too easy to fake and sway people to support what may not be in their best interests based on having a cloak of religion.

Recently, LifeWay Research, the Nashville - based research organization of the Southern Baptist Convention, released a study that reflects just how little affect the videos have had on public opinion.

Or are you just assuming no imam ever has spoken out against extremism because you base all of your opinions on the news, which hasn't chosen to extensively cover the views of imams, seeing as we're not a Muslim country?

Otherwise, it looks like they're just making bald speculations based on their own opinion.

Although many will suggest that Robson has a personal vendetta of sorts aimed squarely at the Grinch who stole soccer, that doesn't make his words any less truthful... such tactics are nothing new... in the U.S.this business practice has become so common that even the players regularly use the media to manipulate public opinion (LeBron James did likewise to rally public support for himself and away from his teammate, Kyrie Irving, who has asked to be traded)... whether for contract leverage or to rally support for or against certain players, this strategy can be incredibly effective at times, but when it misses the mark it can be dangerously divisive... for a close - to - the - vest team like Arsenal to use such nefarious means to manufacture a wedge between the fans and it's best player (again), is absolutely despicable... for the sanctimonious higher - ups who demand that it's players adhere to a certain protocol regarding information deemed «in house» or else to intentionally spread «fake» news or to provide certain outlets with privileged information for such purposes is pretty low indeed... no moral high ground here, just a big club pretending to be a small club so that they can continue to pull the wool over the eyes of a dedicated, albeit somewhat naive, fan base... so not only does this club no give a shit about it's fans, this clearly shows that clubs primary interests aren't even soccer related... for all intent and purposes Kroenke doesn't care if we're a soccer club or a tampon factory as long as we continue to maximized his investment... stay woke people... great to see more and more people commenting on the state of the franchise... this club needs to be held accountable for it's actions

Its not trolling the site says just arsenal so if i rain in some facts or some opinions based in analysing instead of jus stating negative things about the club without such statistics to support such argument if you think that is trolling then go to just spuds they would love to here someone say that are club is falling apart when its not

Just saying, not every decision or opinion we have is based on full knowledge.

I can see Jembuts» point as he writes comments based on his opinion to which the Anti Wenger group are straight on his case and the old lines just roll of the tongue to criticise him.......

OT: The number of fans on here that flip - flop on opinions on a per / game basis is enormous, it is just UNREAL.

I'm just saying your basing you opinion on half a season, now that's your opinion and I respect it but I don't completely agree.

Im all for just giving the batter the base, does nt change the game at all in my opinion.

I'm not going to lie, and when it comes to the many leagues i don't follow football manager and youtube compilations is a lot of the time all i can base my very uneducated opinion on and sometimes my judgement gets clouded because of this... But the lunacy to claim that our 19yo is not good enough when he has performed so admirably taking little to no time to adjust is just ridiculous.

I just want the fans to stick to their opinion and not change the sides as soon as things go against them... For the team, I can only hope that players start performing upto their expectations, they can't expect selection based on their forms and efforts..

Actually, if Kawhi is in NY because he wants to use acupuncture and alternative medicine, and not because he wants to use modern NY - based doctors, then he must believe that established modern sports - medicine is wrong, and not necessarily just the Spurs medical staff... if it's a simple case of the Spurs medical staff misdiagnosing, then why would he follow the acupuncture / alternative medicine approach rather than just following a different medical opinion?

Top - 25 rankings are just based off of the opinions of a group of people, but public bettors often take them too seriously.

It is disrespectful to say that people's opinions are based on just the Stoke game.

These are opinion polls that are not credible therefore you cant base your claim on them.When it comes staging protests and boycott they fail miserably that's why the media and the pundits do not take AOBs seriously they are a bunch of jokers are only active on social medial just whining.

My opinion is based on his overall play and not just his good points that do stand out because the players around him in attack are mediocre at best.

Just like the stock market sometimes reacts in a non pragmatic manner, but even worse for the UFC «rankings» because it is based on a much smaller group of actors who are not even investing actual money in their decisions / opinions.