Sentences with phrase «just out of arguments»

Not exact matches

«I think it is usually when you have a point of maximum fear that you have got the greatest opportunities, so the Chinese market is so large and so deep that you can't just make an argument out of a few market movements and out of a few stocks,» he told CNBC.

The whole «Dow 36,000» argument was essentially based on the notion that all earnings could be paid out as dividends, earnings would still grow, and that investors would be willing to hold stocks for a long - term return of just 6 % annually.

Bill Gurley: That's presenting the argument a very specific way where you're forcing them to opt into something else instead of just opting out.

How foolish — people like you and Maher and Dawkins just take bible readings out of context, and try to read all bible writings as literal — it's such a foolish, dum argument and it proves nothing.

I just asked him to consider the fact that there are a great deal more that run contrary to his argument due in part because he has pulled verses out of context.

From just these six telling arguments I would argue that Calvinism is overcome»... but to question Calvin is to question only a man... Paul on occasion questioned the leading Apostle Peter so if you think it is out of line to question so august a name as Calvin, then you must not agree with Paul on his direct criticism of Peter either.

Yes, its just a piece of the argument, but one that angers me when its dismissed out of hand.

Another thing... if so called «pro-lifers» want to make a reasonable argument against those who are pro-choice or even just on the fence, you might want to smarten up and take the religion out of your argument.

I guess it's just easier to ignore the parts of the Bible that fundamentally negate your argument, especially when they come out of the mouth of Jesus.

And like most believers, who try to use this as an argument, you left out another option... there is a god but he isnt the one you have been worshipping and you are just as screwed as the rest of us.

And if the argument is that businesses can have personal beliefs, then you have just argued for getting businesses out of healthcare altogether and moving to universal healthcare.

And I would also like to point out that the idea of rights is subjective too according to your arguments, there is no such thing as truth and everyone should just live life the way they want too.

@Peteyroo — I just checked out her blog, I believe it was the argument of moral objectivity that was foremost in her mind (why are some actions considered «cruel» or «unjust» — are these just humans standards, or is there some outside standard?)

I would just like to point out that at least as many comments coming from the supposed religious side of the argument are just as if not more «hostile and demeaning» towards those of different or no faith.

It's an insufficient argument to say «Jesus didn't do this during his lifetime so it is something he would never do» (Jesus healed, so Doctor is an OK profession, but he never pulled anyone out of burning buildings, so Firefighters are obviously just following the ways of MAN!).

Mike, not me has just used your abhorrence at the idea of carrying out an act that his god specifically commands as an argument that you have instilled in you an objective sense of right and wrong... of which that same god is the source.

And, in addition, when they, (scientists) do figure something out, you are additionally using the «self - sealing» argument... as in anything that does get proven by science, just becomes «more» reasons to «validate» the existence of God.

Of course, all this needs to be substantially fleshed out and defended over many pages, and Feser does just that with the Aristotelian argument and a few others.

Although I agree with the basic premise of this argument, I would be remiss if I did not point out that the inroads science has made into those realms previously occupied by religion is far greater than just storm prediction.

You can't really separate these books but for the sake of argument if some want to ascribe to a particular point you can't just take a few lines out of one or more chapters and say that's it.

The rest of your argument just flat out sucks.

Or are you going to be one of those cowards (That has doubts about his own argument) that just spits out his opinion and then slams the door?

You just blew your entire argument out of the water.

They turned out to be based on erroneous information (weapons of mass destruction) and a dreamy idealism (democracy)» there was and is much to criticize» but the arguments for war in 2003 were articulate and admitted of just war analysis.

The scientific method isn't an argument against «fine tuning» which is the foundation for ID; the argument to «fine tuning» is M - Theory — essentially stating our Universe isn't anything special, we just happened to evolve in the best suited Universe out of the infinite possible Universes, thus no cosmological need for God.

And what's more, it looks to me as though the Christian Religion lifted out of this mental atmosphere becomes a fish out of water, and rationalistic arguments used against the sacraments and ministry, just as destructive of the Incarnation, in the hands, that is, of a man who would consent to be consistent.

A guy with an AK 4 - 7 Killed some kids who were half of eleven When the arguments started America parted But when we ask god why god says, uh, well, uh, it's really hard to figure out terms like, well, your whole post, which while yelled, is really rather confusing and doesn't seem to say a lot and needs to be interpreted, just like any ancient scripture.

some of it not so good however, because we wanted our relationship to be different from our parents, we wrote our own service and that process was incredibly valuable we had massive arguments and really thrashed out what commitment meant to us and that I think has served us through harder times we are very happy and have two wonderful sons they are musicians Ben and Alfie I'd put a link but I don't know how you can just google them though I think you'd like them:)

When Samuel commented on why it was wrong to sell Lucas Perez you brought up stats between Walcott and Perez and in that you proved using the stats why Walcott is better.If Wenger didn't have blond love for some of his players then why did he keep benching Perez when he was performing yet the average guys always got a look in the squad.So if there are stats which prove Walcott is better aren't there stats which also prove Perez is better?Think about that.You also said Perez is not as good as some of us make out.The funny thing is yesterday we had an argument on Giroud and I also tried to imply that Giroud is not as good as we make out and you opposed.You always kept bringing stats up to defend him.Do you know if Bendtner or Chamakh had scored 25 goals for Arsenal in any season they'd still have been regarded as average.You know why?Because quality has nothing to do with stats and is just a kind pf talent or state.It seems to me that you think you know it all.You also denied the fact that Wenger likes French players and that if Perez was French he wouldn't have been out in one season stating other players as examples.It seems to me that you deny things which are clear for everyone to see.If you think you know better than everyone go and teach Wenger how to win the trophy this season.

If, big if, you have been watching «this lad» for 3 years (and I reckon that is BS just to reinforce an already fragile argument) then you need to take your head out of your lowest orifice and try talking sense.

Just got out of the oral argument.

If i recall exactly we had a whole argument over the valuation of Sterling, you refuted on numerous ocassions when i stated that Sterling would cost more than 35 million the point i made over 2 months ago and still make now and im sure most fans would agree is not that gnabry is better its just he is promising talent, and for the value City paid for Raheem (which is almost criminal considering Di Maria, cost PSG less) it would have been better to see Gnabry given a run out or sign someone actually worth 50 million

i agree andy but its not just the 4 years of hard work that should be taken into account, firstly the fai hav missed out on millions at a time where money is already tight, and more importantly the fact that given, kilbane, o shea, dunne, duff, whelan and keane may be too old when the next one comes around and for a professional footballer to hav a chance to represent his country on the biggest stage of all taken away in this manner is cruel, there can be no argument against technology when there is so much at stake as for henry being labelled a cheat i do not agree as it came at him so quick and although he in fact handled it twice i do not believe it was pre-meditated like maradonnas effort or that disgusting dive by anelka at 0 - 1... can any1 who watched the game live please tell me how lass diarra stayed on the pitch let alone avoided a yellow??

Most of the time the arguments are just a way to let off steam when parents have a bad day or feel stressed out over other things.

Which is another way of actually NOT making a logical argument, but instead just re-stating your point when you think you're proving it — in other words, a classic cop - out.

«It is one that is not going to happen and I think that those backbenchers who keep putting forward those sorts of ideas should just come out and accept that what they really want is for Britain to leave the European Union because that is the argument they are actually making.»

As Larry Summers has pointed out, and to those of us on the Keynesian side of the argument have suggested all along, there is just no defence for ploughing on with the present policies except Tory dogma.

Unclear is whether the Senate plan will adopt Cuomo's version of Child Victims Act language, make amendments to it, offer their own counter-proposal or just leave the issue out of their overall budget plan on the argument that it is not a fiscal matter that has to be dealt with as part of the budget process.

«The argument that the nucleus is an endosymbiont (given by a number of authors) is just not borne out by our knowledge of the structure and function of the nucleus,» concludes Anthony Poole of Massey University in New Zealand.

But if you're, you know just for argument -LSB-'s] sake, if you are 20 feet from the ship, but you're in the same, going exactly the same velocity as the ship, ordinarily well, you would be up the creek, so to speak; because with nothing to accelerate against you would just parallel the path of the ship until you run out of oxygen or starve to death, whatever.

There are plenty of arguments that can be made on this issue, but studies are often flawed and people tend to pick out just what they want to use to prove a point just as you did, so lets keep it simple.

As for the other arguments, I am just as capable of having fun as the next viewer - and I seek out fun in films more often than you might presume.

You can feel every argument swiftly brewing just from the precise angle of Ronan's gaze, out of a car window, or the shades of pugnacity and indignation a peerless Metcalf can broadcast using little more than her chin.

You have in your packet a blue sheet that gives you the order of the day, so I won't belabor that too much, but I will just remind you that we're going to start out with a session on history this morning; then go to a lunchtime segment that will focus on some of the relevant federal constitutional issues, including evaluations of the federal attacks on and defenses of the Blaine amendments; then we will finish off the day with a session that will focus on litigation strategy related to these amendments and some of the arguments being made for and against them in that litigation, as well as a focus on how debates over faith - based initiatives and school vouchers are affected by these particular state constitutional restrictions.

Meanwhile Teach For America's success in recruiting high - quality black and Latino collegians into teaching (with one out of every two recruits in 2014 coming from minority backgrounds) has proven lie to the arguments of ed schools that they just can't provide children with teachers who look like them.

RE: my refusal to name names where pub pros are concerned, it would be foolish of me to risk alienating those interested pros by «outing» them prematurely just to settle an online argument with someone who clearly has no intention of ever using the Vault, anyway.

One sided argument, and you're just flavoring the story to make the reviewers out to be a gang of bullies.

But our argument is that you need to welcome visitors to your site and lay the groundwork for them to want to click through to find out more about your books first, instead of just launching into your sales efforts straight away.

CJ: This is an argument I have quite often with friends of mine that are traditionally published and just flat out refuse to ever consider self - publishing.

Just one look at any 15th or 16th century manuscript will reveal the fallacy of your argument: no punctuation, fonts styles and sizes all over the place, variations in spelling from instance of a word to the next, line run together, spread out, cut off... you name it.