Sentences with phrase «just points numbers»

Not exact matches

But with the S&P 500 surging to 1,560, just 5 points from its all - time high, Parker has finally felt compelled to revise that number.

You might be working on gaining an essential contract or be just about to close a deal and your client asks for your company registration number — At this point of course you can register a new company but, how much easier would it be to use a readily available genuine company number.

Those numbers are just a few of a series of data points that add up quickly.

Healthcare and education are just two examples — but they illustrate a point: if the current system prevents a growing number of people from being able to care for themselves when they are sick, or get the training they need to get a job that supports themselves and their families, they will break the system.

So let me just point out that the growth of the population of companies slowed dramatically in a number of countries in the wake of the global financial crisis.

Last year, while shareholders were generally supportive of the 180 issuers in Canada who held say - on - pay votes, rejecting just two proposals — Canadian Pacific Railway Ltd. (TSX: CP) and Crescent Point Energy Corp. (TSX: CPG)-- the numbers are shifting.

«A great card for anyone who doesn't mind the limited number of places you can use Stash Points at — just 150 hotels nationwide, as of writing this review.»

Lastly, though, and this is the most important point of all — make sure to share your social security number with your lenders so they can give you accurate mortgage rate quotes instead of just best guesses or «ballpark rates».

This is just a starting point which should be adjusted according to a number of factors including your need for income and risk tolerance.

I would have to say, taking into account the number of injuries you could have worked on personally and the likelyhood of them being Atheists and the likelyhood of you knowing this ahead of time that the person was an ACTUAL Atheist or God Hater (have not met one of them) I sort of think you are embellishing just a bit get your some point across that has little substance to begin with.

Superman has Aquaman's phone number saved in case Lex Luthor ever decides to commit some sort of ocean crime, maybe, but then again — Superman can almost certainly handle himself just fine underwater, so what's really the point?

Jimmyc, While you make a point, let me reply that mainstream muslims such as me, my family and just about everybody i knew growing up are in the majority in numbers, there are a couple of (sad) factors that let the extremists hijack our religion 1.

Liberal Boomers, who seldom if ever seriously criticize the legions of conservative - demonizers in your midst, for this post I will mostly join Mr. Druckenmiller in accusing you outright, that is, I will act as if this was your premeditated plan motivated by selfish interest, and not a pattern of political self - delusion that you fell into, given the drip - drip - drip of Democrat talking points over the years, given your gleeful listening to those who dismissed conservatives as hateful dunces, so that you ceased to even consider the NUMBERS conservatives kept pointing to, and just kept on doggedly voting D.

You are making it needlessly hard, or are perhaps just plain too stupid to understand such a simple fact as: there's no point debunking myths that virtually no one and no one at all with any real clout believes in anyway, but MUCH point in debunking myths that large numbers of people, including powerful politicians, believe should be the guiding principles for the country's entire political culture and laws.

In considering the Providence of God alongside the workings of the JULY / AUGUST 2006 natural laws he goes on to explain: «It is crystal clear that the Christian faith presupposes that God's providence is not just general but is very concrete, reaching down to the smallest and most unlikely details, even to the point that «all the hairs of our head» are numbered.

And when you try to explain that you are not disagree with God, but that you just understand the Bible differently, then they start accusing you of not believing in inspiration, or not believing the Bible is inerrant, or any number of things which completely miss the entire point.

Even the Brundtland Commission, which at first glance seems to be an exception with its blunt language about unsustainable population growth, ends in a familiar UN place: «Talking of population just as numbers glosses over an important point: People are also a creative resource, and this creativity is an asset societies must tap....

The film surely rightly points out that this very speculative idea that our universe is just one of a very large number just makes the cosmos bigger, without thereby removing the apparent need for the sustenance of God.

And in every single instance this point is being made, it just simply gets ignored, as if it did not matter to a large number of females or parents.

Writing about Humanae Vitae just a month after Pope Paul VI issued it, at which point lots of Catholics, including a goodly number of Jesuits, had popped a cork, the then - superior general asked his fellow Jesuits to assume an attitude of «obedience which is at once loving, firm, open, and truly creative» and «to do everything possible to penetrate, and to help others penetrate, into the thought which may not have been his own previously» - precisely because they were Jesuits, and this is what Jesuits do.

There are over 30,000 xtian sects around the world, and the number just keeps on growing because every time someone gets upset over some social or biblical point, they start their own church.

I'm not sure if your pointing fun at people who do this kind of ministry, but I just want to back them up and say that I have seen a countless number of healings happen in such a way.

this is just my own personal theory, but I suspect the reason Jesus cursed the fig tree that He did, was because he was probably tired, and hungry to the point of low blood sugar or hypoglycemia, and it made Him irritable... naturally, He was walking around in a body like ours, as it is said, like us in every way but sin... everybody tries to read something woowoo theological into it but maybe He was just tired and hungry, and irritability is a symptom for a number of conditions, but especially blood glucose or migraine issues... maybe He had migraines... I get those myself... just my theory, so the two Bible scholars that keep coming on here shouldn't shoot bible verses at me... just sayin... Good «toon, David

Just as in algebra the variables are an abstraction from specific numbers, so in geometry variable points are generalized from points.

In sufficient number of causes to make us humble, we discover good points in the cause which time has erased, just as one often learns more from the slain hero of a tragedy than from some brassy Fortinbras who comes in at the end to announce the victory and proclaim the future disposition of affairs.

It's safe to say I'm addicted, but nothing to worry about because I have a number to a group on hand, just in case it ever gets to that point.

Just use that number and divide by how many slices you get out of the bread (slice it first, or estimate from mid point and quarter point of loaf, taking into account that end slices and middle slices might vary a little).

I didn't list a serving size for these, instead just listing the nutrition info and points per tender, so you can select the right number for you.

It's part of the reason his numbers on the season are relatively underwhelming at 11.6 points per game on just 42 percent shooting from the field.

We are not league contenders for a number of reasons, and not just because of the point difference.

In just his second NBA season, the former number one overall pick averaged 20.8 points, 10.0 rebounds and a league - leading 2.82 blocks per game.

At this point the record is just a number associated with them..

Here's how the Buckeyes are still running their base inside zone play, with a flair that allows them to keep a defense from keying numbers at the point of attack: This gives defensive backs a lot to think about after the snap, when they prefer to just flow to the ball.

And as Mr. Salt up there so eloquently pointed out, his numbers aren't just a reflection of his play alone.

My only point is that it is unreasonable to assume Hurst isn't worth taking at number 20, just because he is undersized.

Gilbert could very well turn it on and become a great number 2, but I'm just not sure we can bank on him at this point.

I guess that's my point... once you get past a certain number of guys, the competency of NFL quarterbacking just falls off a cliff.

Secondly, we are just five points off the top and when one considers that Man City has to meet Chelsea, Man U, Leicester, Spurs while Leicester also has a number of tricky games I can predict that there are still a lot of twists and turns ahead.

As you point out there's in fact a number of candidates we could go for, Schneiderlin is just the obvious fit given he's french and plays in the prem already — hence the constant links.

And the Scot is not prepared to stop there, Moyes is keen to acquire a number of January transfer targets with Burnley's Danny Ings and Arsenal's Joel Campbell also linked as his La Liga side stand at the halfway point of the season with just 19 points.

Both of these clubs are on 50 points which is just five behind Arsenal with the same number of games left to play, so they are both potential top four contenders.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Briana Claros (Pinewood - Los Altos Hills, Sr.), 5 - 5, Guard KEY STATS: Though Claros had good numbers for Pinewood (11.2 points and 4.4 assists per game, plus a 2.3 assist / turnover ratio), her leadership was just as important.

I wondered that too but a friend pointed out that while Sanchez has seemingly had a number of teams looking to speak to him ozil hasn't had many, maybe he's just realised he's better off staying where he is, don't get me wrong I'm happy he is.

At this point why even have divisions and not just have equal number of games within conference?

So while Din can still develop... it's just a numbers game at this point.

This writer fails to mention - just yesterday i pointed it out - the number of finals and semi-finals we have been to and which we have lost due to individual errors.

Just the other day someone posted some statistics to prove his point but instead the numbers were showing that I have been right all the time.

There are any number of different reasons that have been pointed to in order to explain why Arsenal keep coming up short in the hunt for the Premier League title and it is very unlikely to be just one of them, but a combination of certain factors like the almost constant injury crisis and the pressure of expectation from the Arsenal fans and the players» failure to deal with it.

Not trying to start an argument just wanted to get my point across and if the selection is switched (plus cech to me is a better keeper but the risk of courtois leaving if he wasn't given the number 1 spot is what meant cech became number 2 to someone ten years younger than him) that would make the split 5 - 6 arsenal - Chelsea, a much more balanced split.