Sounds to me like she is
just presenting her interpretation of the Bible, which is the only thing anyone can do.
Not exact matches
AthiestSteve — I realize you are
just throwing a punch and there is not room for lengthy discourse, but there's not «
just two
interpretations» as you
present it.
And if you look at it from that perspective, it
just doesn't support the common
present - day
interpretation that God showed favoritism.
That original Islam is only hinted at in the Qur» an and the Hadith, which were written years after the prophet Mohammed had his mystical experience —
just as the original precepts of Christianity are minimized and only obliquely
presented in the New Testament and its «authorized» translations,
interpretations and commentaries, which were written over many years, well after Jesus» ministry and Paul's mystical experience.
Martin Luther
presented the theology of Sola scriptura that the bible is the sole source to live and understand what Christianity is all about... but the bible itself does not come with a table of contents to prove that it is correct which is why the bible itself says that the CHURCH is the pillar and foundation of truth... remember that the church existed before even the bible was even put together... To understand the bible you cant
just rely on your own
interpretation like the protestants often say... The truth is always absolute and hence the teachings of the bible HAS to be absolute which is why the church is said to be ONE in nature (in every sense of the word), HOLY, CATHOLIC (Universal in teaching in every corner of the world) and APOSTOLIC (roots dating back to Jesus himself)... Now figure out what is that one church... The church put together the bible and the holy spirit always protected the church against false teachings and 1600 years later came about the teaching of Sola Scriptura... Protestants... look within and see whats wrong with this teaching.
I suppose if we could revisit ourselves in a thousand years, look at the historical recordings of ourselves, we will see there are factual basis, but sprinkled with human
interpretation of our
present time now by those who have appointed themselves as the keepers of what we do,
just as the recordings of the Bible were done by those appointees trying to capture there presnt now... yet sprinkled with their best
interpretation of what they new then.
Also, multiple tumor types might be
present, and you can make the wrong
interpretation with
just this test.
It
just shouldn't, except if bias is involved, lead to the
interpretation you
present, by the methods of reasoning and careful study.