Sentences with phrase «just providing money»

Your role can be as little as just providing the money... and a turn key real estate investment company like Anderson Real Estate Investments, LLC takes care of the rest.

Jackson, Johnson, and Persico and I completely agree that just providing money is not sufficient for getting good results.

Clearly, states have changed in many other ways than just expenditure, but there is no reason to conclude from these data that just providing money will by itself boost student achievement.

Most important, little evidence shows that just providing money to families can change the relevant family inputs, whatever they are.

One of the reasons for giving a set amount of allowance, rather than just providing money when asked, is to create a situation similar to the real world of receiving a paycheck on a regular basis.

Not exact matches

Last year, the U.S. Federal Reserve earned about $ 70 billion just by providing its citizens (or, in the case of the C - note, a global criminal elite) with physical money.

While tech companies dislike paying taxes — just look at Apple, which keeps much of its money offshore to avoid taxes, or Twitter, which once threatened to leave San Francisco unless it received a special tax break — none of them wants to be labeled as an opponent of anything that would provide help for the homeless and those with low incomes.

Congress on Dec. 21 averted a shutdown just one day before federal funding was due to expire, sending Trump a bill to provide just enough money to keep agencies operating through Jan. 19.

Let them drive — you're just there to provide gas money.

For people tired of being stuck in an office or just looking to make money from home, a home business can provide income and a flexible schedule.

, just provide some FI / FU money, or even to provide for an annual vacation; the key is that it can provide options and open up all sorts of possibilities.

By contrast, homeowners can use a HELOC to provide the money for just about any type of spending.

Yes, there is a limit to what an advisor can do for someone with limited assets (i.e., say under $ 100k), but he / she can still provide solid advice (i.e., you are just starting out, put your money in these index funds and contribute to them on a regular basis).

And now the bank is providing the customers it harmed with inaccurate information or making them jump through hoops just to get their money back.»

You «just» have to pick stocks and eventually they will grow and provide you some monthly income via dividends or you trade them from time to time and making money with it.

2options has some nice bonuses that it provides to its many traders and they are not just in the form of sign up bonuses either; there are also generous bonuses that an investor is eligible for based on the amount of money they trade.

the headline was just poorly chosen, it was more meant like you can't charge people for letting them send their own money, the important part is «The only way to earn money with wallets is to provide a service on top of it.»

In a typical arrangement for a young company to raise money a VC might demand a 50 % equity stake and a lengthy 5 - 7 year lock up in exchange for providing just the first few million in capital.

If it's the case, as some argue, that policymaker approaches around the world are evolving in that direction, then that provides yet another basis for valuations to get pushed higher, just as it provided a basis in our earlier example for a depositor to keep money in a bank despite being paid a paltry rate.

But the truth is that corporations make money from you in different ways and not just by the direct service that they provide.

If somebody has had a terrible time in life and they have gone through one tragedy after another and you tell them that God loves them, they might just laugh at you... Many times we have to be willing to show people the love of God, and that can be anything from being patient over a long period of time to providing for a physical need that they have that may cost [us] some money.

Religion is just a bunch of businesses that make money, employ, and provide a service (a service that makes people hate others, and tears the World apart).

Providing a service for money should be just as good as providing it Providing a service for money should be just as good as providing it providing it for free.

I'm glad for this list as well... so I can ensure to NOT shop there They don't need my hard earned money... God will just magically provide for them.

and only is in it for the money» «it's just the imagination of man vs. the wisdom of man» «God could be like Galactus in the Marvel comics» «lies upon lies» «The fact that an explanation actually is provided is all that the fans really want.»

I don't think it's so much about the levites being paid for their service it's about us doing what's right toward Pastors that must feed and tend to the flock of GOD if GOD has called them.JESUS even said in luke 10:7 that the laborers are worthy of their wages.In luke 8 1 - 4 it's says even JESUS HIMSELF recieved financial support from the women who ministered to him with their possessions.Now most people today would say he should have been ashamed of taking money from those poor women but JESUS accepted their support and they was blessed for sowing onto the LORD»S work.1 Corinthains 9:1 - 15 says dint muzzle the ox while it tread out the grain was GOD talking about oxes no he was talking about those who labor in the ministry.Who goes to war at their own expense.Or who goes to war but pay for their clothes, guns, etc.No one because the goverment if that country provide these things because of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLESS.

Furthermore, some 82 % of adults think that own label products provide value for money, compared to just 16 % for brands.

Finally, and to reiterate an earlier point, the way forward for this club is to stop paying below average bench players so much money and to focus the bulk of the weekly wages on establishing a dominant starting 11... this will require the club to eat some wages in order to ship some players out, get rid of any deadwood over the age of 21, develop a cutting edge scouting service and put your money where your mouth is for once... I would much rather have a starting 11 that was world - class and give some reasonably paid young blue - chippers playing time when injuries occur than have 2 or 3 world class players surrounded by a plethora of overpaid and underwhelming players... management would no longer be able to sell their half - baked plans to the fans under the guise of «winning now», which any intelligent fan knows is a crap - shoot at best, and instead create a a squad that provides hope for the present and the future... this is exactly the model that has been used by Barcelona, Real & Bayern, so it should be good enough for us... by the way, until Messi & Ronaldo re-signed just recently all 3 clubs weekly wages were on par with ours... think about that for a second or two

It's nice then to hear a positive news story pertaining to World Cup footballers and money and it's been reported that Greece have provided just such a story.

But very few people have any historical context and just drink the free market capitalistic koolaid, so they say things like «It's their money» as if that sentence alone provides all the moral context anyone could possibly need.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Below shows just how much money is being wagered on Mohaymen at William Hill, which provides some reasoning behind the movement.

lol dude, just saying that soccer teams have to provide money for around 15 - 22 players whilst bball teams only have to play for 10 players, meaning each player can earn much more, you see young rookies in bball earning 5 million a year in their first season but in football a starlet would only get almost 500k a year its alot of money but you see the difference son.

most of you fans just talk too much about money as if you will provide for the club... RVP career in Arsenal has been on the sideline for years.

«Just because we're losing money doesn't mean we shouldn't provide the service.

Today, it is not enough to just provide the finest that money can give.

Why couldn't the program just feed those in need and provide actual Whole Food not processed because of the money saved.

Even after paying a good amount of money, some strollers just do not provide sufficient space for the elder child to stand or sit comfortably.

I agree 100 % that if we (as a nation) honestly want schools to teach students what and how to eat (as opposed to just selling / providing food), we do need to invest money in the marketing and education you mention as well as the food itself.

Breastfeeding is one of those relatively few social changes that can provide huge benefits for a lot less money than other interventions — just like Attachment Parenting.

Some suggestions: give visitors stuff to do besides just give you money, create a site design that says something about the candidate, recognize your best volunteers, provide users with a behind - the - scenes look at your campaign, and create a community around your site.

This week's news that Obama's 2012 campaign has already assembled a powerful army of small online donors — more than a million people have given him money so far, only half of whom did so in 2008 — provided just one of many recent glimpses into the growth of what's shaping up to be a reelection juggernaut.

Also published on HuffingtonPost This week's news that Obama's 2012 campaign has already assembled a powerful army of small online donors — more than a million people have given him money so far, only half of whom did so in 2008 — provided just one of many recent glimpses...

But the governor just couldn't resist taking a bit of a swipe at the Senate Democrats for drawing a line in the sand on providing property tax relief in the budget, calling it a «sham» to provide tax rebate checks that are funded with borrowed money.

Just released court papers provide more detail about the late Assemblymember Bill Nojay and allegations that he misdirected money from a client's escrow account.

There are unfunded mandates and lack of aid from the state, and while he has provided more money for education, it is less than the Campaign for Fiscal Equity settlement [the 2006 court ruling requiring the state to pay billions in backpay to shortchanged school districts]... When [Assembly Speaker Carl] Heastie proposed a slightly progressive income tax, he just rejected it.

Parties need money not just to fight elections but to perform the other roles they fulfil in our democracy, from developing policy to providing effective opposition.

«We're not just providing funding - which we are, and it's a long story about how we were able to free up the money with austerity in Albany - but it's also devolved decision making,» Tobe said.

Not just a hothouse for the already privileged, it uses money from foundations and wealthy individuals to provide financial assistance to half of its students.

Taxpayer money could provide credibility and ensure that results are properly reported, rather than just rumoured.