Sentences with phrase «just running models»

Right now, we are just running models of questionable validity.

Just running models and taking votes is not scientific in my book.

Glad to see they are willing to study the elements of climate and not just run the models over and over.

Just running the model without testing it against further real - world experiments tells you nothing.

Not exact matches

He says: «It's not only just about their business model, but how it's how they plan on running their business.

These designers could just as easily run a Kickstarter campaign, but Before the Label's business model rewards backers with the actual product once a campaign successfully closes, as opposed to the customary thank you card or small gift from Kickstarter, for example.

The most recent consensus of models is that this track will run inland along the west side of the Florida peninsula from south to north, although it could end up just offshore or farther inland.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Gordon wrote on many topics: angling techniques («The fly must be placed to an inch as the fish will rarely take it unless it floats over them just right»), the books he read, the effects of drought and floods on fish, the seasons of the year («The silence of the snows is over all the land, and the bright waters of our trout streams run almost black between icy banks») and his belief in the natural fly as a model for the artificial («The insect must be studied and many patterns dressed before one can hope to satisfy the critical eyes of the trout»).

Yes, you read that right — that crib at IKEA for under $ 100 is just as safe as the European designer model from a fancy boutique that runs $ 2000.

Secondly, we have people who are just aligned differently - either running on populist model that may be wholly orthogonal to two main parties, or, libertarianish leaning people who differ from Democrats on being fiscally conservative and pro-small-government and differ from mainline Republicans on being socially liberal and pro-pretty-much-anything (including pro-immigration in a lot of cases, but also more famousely pro-drug-legalization, etc...)

«Visualizing life in silico: A new interface allows any cell biologist — not just master programmers — to run biological models on the Virtual Cell supercomputer.»

But it was just a model, running at a maddeningly slow speed on legacy machines that could never be brainlike, never step up to the cognitive plate.

«Locomotion of bipedal dinosaurs might be predicted from that of ground - running birds: BIRDS Model uses just two inputs to predict terrestrial locomotion in extinct avian and non-avian dinosaurs.»

The models we run now produce El Niño events just like they occur in nature.

They scanned seven minke whale heads in CT and MRI machines, created computer models of the ears and surrounding soft tissue, and dissected the whale noggins to reveal ear fat running from blubber just under the skin to the ear bones.

Greenblatt and co-author Samveg Saxena at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory developed a model that is essentially a «best - case scenario,» where the cars are not just driverless but also run on electricity.

These runs aren't perfect, but if the main problem in European regional temperature increase were due to just the delay, the models would probably be doing OK.

Also just a few months ago Millar et al. 2017 had to admit that the climate models indeed had been running much too hot and that the 1.5 °C target can be reached as well with a tripling of CO2 emissions.

We've got a great representation of these things within ecosystem models that we tend to use uncoupled and we just run those on the land surface.

But our bodies just don't run on an every - day - is - the - same kind of model.

Middle aged Men in general run on the wings of hopes that they can still pull a glamour model just because they are financially secure but nothing special about them.

What the **** is this piece of **** I'm just going to run through the problems: Glitches happen EVERY TIME, making them literal programming instead of glitches, one of the reviews claim it has a story, the levels are embarrassingly small, there are minimal NPC models, the physics is **** it somehow lags to **** and the levels just end the things that can be done, the YouTube clips are

No immersion, very little teamwork (everyone is just running around doing their «thing»), weapons are unrealistic (nothing but giant, over embellished chunks of metal with exaggerated functions), player team models make no sense (a mix of future U.S. Army soldiers, English soldiers, terrorists with masks, and this ape thing)-- the enemy has the same models too, too many screen markers

Since the backgrounds are fully modeled rather than just being static 2D images, enemies can actually run around, take cover, and fire at you from these areas.

Amidst this whirlwind of excitement — drinking and dancing with the fine folk in steerage, that nude modeling session, a window - steaming passionate encounter inside a cargo hold car, false accusations of theft — the Titanic has a run - in with a large iceberg, which may just pose a deadly and premature end to the supposedly unsinkable ocean liner.

Gerstein has run a number of professional development courses that seek to instruct teachers in how to model a growth mindset amongst students and one of her key principles is encouraging teachers to see themselves as learners, and, just like students are all capable of learning and improving, so too are teachers (Gerstein 2014)

Interestingly, the quantitative difference between an endogenous and neoclassical model framework - with improved skills affecting the long - run growth rate versus just the steady - state income level - matters less than academic discussions suggest.

Though this field is just emerging, chapter six spotlights a handful of the most promising digital learning models, including some up and running in D.C.

This is just another stunning case in which our system produces much worse results at much higher cost than a system run on the professional model.

He argues that it will make New Orleans a new model, radically redefining the role of central school boards just as many urban school districts are shifting increasingly large portions of their students to independently run but publicly funded charter schools.

In the Scion's case, that's due to the car's rarity: Just 1,000 Release Series 2.0 models are being built, each with external mods (including front and rear lip spoilers and LED daytime running lights), a unique greenish - khaki paint job (Scion calls it Lunar Storm), and 17 - inch forged - aluminum wheels in dark metallic silver (almost black).

With a limited run of just 600 cars (400 in Europe and a further 200 restyled versions for the Japanese market) it's more of a toe in the water exercise than a full - on assault, but its character will set the tone for a raft of go - faster models from the Japanese firm.

Theoretically, the car can run two flat - out laps of the Nurburgring with very little degradation in peak performance — in contrast to cars like the Tesla Model S, whose quick Ludicrous mode acceleration runs require a full charge and lengthy conditioning procedure for just a few seconds of flat - out performance.

> MPG and running costs - Hybrid model achieves over 70mpg, officially at least, with just shy of 50mpg for the turbo.

The car never caught on in the U.S. and was Scion's worst - selling model by far, racking up just 8,879 sales in its best year, 2012, and just over 15,000 sales during its entire three - year run in the States.

2014 will be the last model year of the Toyota FJ Cruiser, and the FJ Cruiser Ultimate Edition was just revealed today at the 2013 Specialty Equipment Market Association (SEMA) show in Las Vegas as a limited - run farewell model.

Pricing runs at a very reasonable $ 1495 for S60, XC60, and XC70 models equipped with the turbo - six; Volvo owners of 2008 and newer S40, V50, C30, and C70 cars equipped with the T5 engine can have the extra power for just $ 1295.

I bought a 2002 base model Boxster, with that small 2.7 L engine, and it'll run from 0 - 60 in just under 6 seconds, ridiculous performance and still gets around 25 mpg.

The editors of Automobile Magazine aren't the only ones who are fans of the Mazda Miata, as proven by the fact that a limited - run anniversary model of the car sold out just ten minutes after it went on sale yesterday.

Crucially, this early V8 model had a manual» box and just 25,000 miles behind it, meaning the only thing missing was «new - car smell», but I'm told you can buy that in a bottle — # 1748 would run to a lifetime's supply.

Introduced in 2010, at the end of the 997's life cycle, it could have been just another run - out model.

The base E63 (available as a sedan only) and the S - Model wagon make the run to 60 mph in just 3.6 seconds; the S - Model sedan gets there a tenth of a second quicker.

This model is beast and is the quickest SUV on the market, it «s capable to run from 0 to 60 mph in just 3,5 sec, while the top speed scores 180 mph.

The automaker has taken its high - performance model, the Stelvio Quadrofoglio powered by a 505 - horsepower twin - turbocharged V6, and challenged the Nurburgring, where it ran the 12.9 - mile Nordschleife circuit in just under eight minutes, faster than any other production SUV and a respectable time for any production vehicle.

After all, this new model — the third Koenigsegg, following the CC8S and CCR — will go from a stop to sixty mph in just 3.2 seconds, and will make a quarter mile seem shorter that a McDonald's drive - thru, running it in just 9.9 seconds at 146 mph.

Values are just starting to move ahead, and early cars are starting to sell for between # 60,000 and # 75,000, while a nice S is # 100,000 and an Ultimate Edition [the run - out model, just 50 made] is way beyond that.

The top STS model runs 0 — 60 mph in just 6.4 seconds [13] and has a 14.8 second quarter - mile time.

And the new sportier i3s model is even quicker, running from 0 - 60 mph in just 6.8 seconds.

Production declined steadily after 1991's respectable 97,000 - plus, finishing just above 12,000 for the token»95 model run.