Not exact matches
You can
just look out for the trifecta of symptoms that psychologists
say define the personality disorder — an unrealistic sense of superiority, a sense of entitlement or
belief that the person deserves special treatment, and a noticeable lack of empathy.
«
Just like anyone can start their day with a killer workout, find a way to master a craft, find meaning in their work or create a passionate and loving relationship,» he
says, «the secret lies in being able to break through the fear and unlock the limiting
beliefs to create the life of your dreams.»
You might feel stifled, or have grown complacent, but sometimes you
just need to
say «enough is enough» to your self - limiting
beliefs, and embrace the truth that you are worthy of what you want.
Contrary to popular
belief, Tumblr is also a lot more than
just silly memes and weighty quotables, Karp
says.
But Gundlach
said his FANG thesis was largely based on his
belief that the companies were Clinton darlings, relics of the «old machine,» an era that has now ended: «It's
just so obvious to me,» he added.
I'm
just saying that if some scientists believe in one pholosophy, and disagree with others who believe in a different philosophy doesn't mean anything other than a difference in
beliefs.
It would be more clear to
say that Atheism is a world view,
just like the
belief in God is a world view.
In reading some of the comments, I would
just like to
say that I would rather take a chance of being wrong in my
belief in God as well as my faith in Jesus Christ as to be one that
says there is no God only to stand before Him in the final judgement to hear the words «depart from me» and be cast into the lake of fire...
Saying that God is real over and over
just reinforces your
belief that he is, it doesn't actually prove that he does exist.
So how do you go from that reasoning to «Since it wasn't accidental then it must have been this ancient male diety named (fill in blank depending on religion) who loves me and knows me and cares for me and wants me to perform rituals that have nothing to do with morality like prayer, not eating certain things, sabaath and many more
just because he
said so, even though we have no record of him
saying anything,
just records of humans who wrote things down that they claim he
said, but I want to believe it all so badly I will base my
beliefs on no other evidence than «it
just can't be accident».
I
just said that there is no Login button for this
Belief Blog, neither I see a Settings tab anywhere either.
I'm
just tired of people who
say there is no God
saying I am stupid for my
beliefs when they act in moronic things and do things
just as bad as Christians do in the name of what they believe.
Just as that misses the point of Berkeley's metaphysics, so his refusal to take seriously Hume's deathbed ease in unbelief
says more about his lack of a philosophical temperament than about the authenticity of Hume's
belief.
If you really don't care about evidence, if you
just wanted us to provide an answer without any interest in what we'd
say, or without any care to understand our position... then I guess yeah, there's no way for me to show your
beliefs to be flawed, as you've adopted a purely egocentric epistemology.
Granted any set of
beliefs will have people that are idiots and Christianity has their share, but
saying you are oppressed
just because someone mentions God isn't the same as being oppressed.
And with that
said... I certainly agree with what - Frogist
said, and I would
just add that even in being «kind» and «respectful» discussing your «
beliefs» would not necessarily cause you or other believers to feel «a whole lot of difference.»
If the pope
said tomorrow that the pill is OK — then all of you naysayers will
just flip your
beliefs.
It really does nt matter what my
beliefs system was, let's
just say it was based on chaos theory and science as applied to occult arts, I have since moved on to more pragmatic
beliefs but I clearly recall how oppressive they were and surprised at how much propaganda they spread that was based on their ignorance.
This is
just the beginning, I personally will call you out in public or anywhere you flaunt your ridiculous «
beliefs» which are
just nonsense to
say the very least.
Kevin your right personal
beliefs and or religion does not belong in law, and I am not
saying that what this atheist organization is doing is wrong or anything, I think what there doing is a good thing, I
just think this particular message could have been done from a different perspective, this message makes them appear like the self righteous ones, and it might give out the wrong kind of message, instead it should have
said something like you believe in god fine, but don't put it in our laws.
In the end all you are doing is
just relying on your own
belief because even though there is no proof that that there actually is no deity who does not want to be made known but would rather have us develop our faith in
said deity, since there is thus far no irrefutable proof that there is such a deity, that you then come to a conclusion that there is no such deity, all you are doing is
just relying on
belief just like I'm relying on
belief and that what it really boils down to is
just that it is all a matter of
belief.
In typical fashion, your should now react the way that the religious have reacted to their
belief being shown wrong... it is simple...
just say» oh that part isn't meant to be taken literally» and move on...
We get to
say what our opinions and
beliefs are (
just like you).
Although it seems it's pretty evident that he was
just a bad employee and made a stressful work environment, let's
say that he was fired
just for his
beliefs.
Just as in politics (sorry to even
say the word politics but this was the best example I could think of) there are extremist and extreme
beliefs.
So many people who advocate or speak publicly for political or personal reasons aren't acknowledged as much when it comes to religion when someone is wanting to speak out about there faith a light bulb goes off and
says we don't want to hear, or talk, or, air any thing that has to do with the mentioning of God but because of the high profile story and because this is the President of the United States it's ok hats off to them for not being ashamed to speak about there faith I agree with Richard some people
just because they profess there faith doesn't mean there trying to push there
beliefs on anyone people of faith have a right to free speech also.
... i know your book
says don't believe anything else before or after to protect its place in history, but
just as you would read greek mythology and have incredulous thoughts about multigods ruling the earth water and the undergrounds, those who are not stuck on your wavelength, read your mythology and think how anyone in their right minds could ever fall for those idolatric stories... your
belief in your creationist god is as unfathomable as an adult looking up the chimney and feeling the power of Santa Clause in them... does the power of Santa Clause compel you?
I don't know how a
belief system that is founded on the principle of loving others — not
just saying it, but actually doing that — can justify enslaving or supporting slavery.
Just pointing out that considering the mistranslations and following incorrect
beliefs there is very little in the bible that you can take for granted, or as having been given «directly from god», many priests / pastors take this statement and run with it
saying that that is where you have to have «faith».
And yes, even Francis Collins has admitted that, he wouldn't be so quick to
say «my
beliefs are true»,
just «I believe my
beliefs are true».
@response you
said: «You might actually try real, honest dialogue about faith and
belief instead of
just railing off extremes and trying to cover it by
saying all atheists are rational, reasonable people.
We're
just following what he's already done in our lives for us,» he
said, referring to the Christian
belief that Jesus saved all mankind from slavery and sin.
We don't
say there are six types of Theists, we focus on the Religions, and that is what is missing — a modern Religion /
Belief system for Atheists — as Atheism does not mean without rules,
just about whether God exists or not.
There is something very powerful about pulling up a seat to the table across from someone who has a different interpretation, a different lifestyle, a different
belief all together, and
just saying, «My aim here is not to be heard and to be right, my aim is to listen to you and try to understand you.»
... religious
beliefs are
just so bloody ridiculous...
says a guy who thinks that a rock will turn into a single celled organism if it sits in warm salt water long enough...
I know that might seem a silly question in light of what I
just said, but old
beliefs and fears die hard.
I'm
just saying here that perhaps some of these
beliefs need some free thought since they old, dated, and no longer working for many people.
This writer was
just saying she found a way to work through this while being true to her lack of
belief.
however, as I
said to sam above —
just read the CNN
belief blog with regularity.
DON: In the old days before the internet, you could
just willy - nilly
say the Bible
said pretty much anything you wanted and people
just didn't have the knowledge, the references or the ability to research the other tribes out there who were speaking against those ideas to affect our
beliefs.
This emphasis on the primacy of
belief was the first message of Muhammad to the Arabs,
just as it was the message of all apostles and prophets; as the Qur» an
says, «
Say (O Muslims): We believe in Allah and that which is revealed unto us and that which was revealed unto Abraham, and Ishmael, and Isaac, and Jacob, and the tribes, and that which Moses and Jesus received, and that which the Prophets received from their Lord.
Many people would
say that my dis
belief in a god that is described by any organized religion, and my rejection of jesus christ as our savior, and feel he was
just another person, those two things alone would be sufficient to keep me out of heaven.
I don't agree with a lot of what you guys are
saying, but the world isn't black and white and our
beliefs are
just more colors on the spectrum... beautiful in their own way.
Folks, note that Chad's statement, «it's irrational to call
belief in something irrational, if you yourself arent prepared to
say that
belief is incorrect» is either stupidity or
just more of him being intentionally obtuse (insufficient evidence = no
belief = rational position).
Just because the claims of xians that god does exists is dogmatic, doesn't mean that anyone who doesn't follow that superstition can be
said to be dogmatic, simply because of that lack of
belief.
In a press release, organizers
said the event was focused on promoting Pancasila, Indonesia's state philosophy, which encompasses five basic principles that include
belief in one God,
just and civilized society, unity and democracy.
Their
belief is NOT to question what their «Prophet»
says —
just do it.
We
just have to
say that that is fine for him, but for you, without
belief in God you would not know how to live and your life would have no meaning.
I'm certain there are those who
say I was
just delusional and was somehow subconsciously deluding myself or was
just trying to justify my
beliefs even though at the time I had some very deep fears and concerns believing that it was likely I wouldn't get anything.
I have
just said that the church could not survive the surrender of these
beliefs.