Sentences with phrase «just secular people»

The secular people, well it's not just secular people, the people of this nation and other nations as well, spend so much money on nonsense that if it could have been used to help the unfortunate in this world, there would be no hunger.

Not exact matches

I think something secular where people just want to do some good things in the world, apart from religion, is what I need.

he is there to forgive if people repent, but he is also is a just God and will punish sin no matter what secular society wants to teach

In most states, people can still be fired from their (secular) jobs just for being gay, or thrown out of their homes if their landlord doesn't like LGBT people.

I don't know how many times I heard,» their just going to spend it on beer», «that's the governments job»,» it's their own fault and God is judging them,» I have seen so many people healed by secular organizations, physically and Spiritually.

Just replace black with gay and you'll understand what is happening when people like you use their religion as a weapon against EQUAL rights in a SECULAR country.

They are just as good and bad as most people when they are doing secular activities, unless the activity and their actions are based on religious bias.

Try following this again, it's not about education level it's about belief, the secular argument is that people of that age were not skeptical and that is just not true to think otherwise is «chronological snobbery» > Just cause it's written doesn't mean it's tjust not true to think otherwise is «chronological snobbery» > Just cause it's written doesn't mean it's tJust cause it's written doesn't mean it's true.

> Try following this again, it's not about education level it's about belief, the secular argument is that people of that age were not skeptical and that is just not true to think otherwise is «chronological snobbery»

To allow any religious or secular group their own holiday would just be chaos, and to believe there are supposedly educated people who would support such is absurd.

There is still sin though, its just like everything else the secular people want any hint of God out of Society.

«If we're going to expand our base and we're going to draw in more people to recognize the virtues of living in a secular world, we need to appeal to more than just that geek and nerd subset of the population.

we do not agree... MY point is that the SECULAR people say it is just a theology book..

No one is saying the president, or any politician, needs to be an atheist, just that they need to keep and open and secular mind... that means accepting other religions as valid... which is something that devout religious people tend to be unable to do.

It is significant that the terms of the debate about faith in the world are deemed to have been set by people like Richards Dawkins, just as it is significant that the debate is seen as a «political and secular», rather than a religious, one.

In all honesty, the «religious people» that don't legislate against things based solely on their religious convictions and thereby hurt the rights of individuals, and who don't condemn science and medicine and societal progression and other religions and other denominations and people who are not religious, and who don't claim to know that something is true beyond all other truths, are probably a very slim minority, and I'd have to argue that they aren't really religious, they are just doing whatever makes them feel good, which could be accomplished through secular means as well.

This doesn't mean they're bad / invalid arguments, or that there aren't more secular people who use these arguments as a primary reason, just that in general the religious argument is the most common / important in discourse about this topic.

Don't be fooled by secular people trying to pretend they are Christians just to get your hard - earned dollars.

The choice not to act, I realized after a college class on postmodern thought, is itself an act, and like most people I came to recognize the secular version of the sin of omission and to understand that, sometimes, failing to act is just as blameworthy as acting badly.

At the same time, he is genuinely interested in rituals, not just as historical ceremonies, but as ways of bringing people and thoughts together, just as he is sincere in his approach to incantation and religious music, testing even the most secular members of his audience to reconsider their ambivalence about the «spiritual» in art.

Just goes to show that environmentalists aren't people who sincerely want to help the environment, but rather the secular equivalent of the corrupt Catholic priests of medieval times, who got rich by selling indulgences.

For instance, while many people used to get pre-marital counseling from their religious leader, now it is just as common to get it from a secular or non-affiliated counselor.