Sentences with phrase «just sell the asset»

I had just sold some assets of my business and I decided to go ahead and manage that in a Buffettstyle concentrated portfolio, buying things I understood, etc..

The business, as it stands, appears to be worth far less than the properties themselves — far better to just sell the assets & pay - down debt.

Unlike with a home or auto loan, with credit card debt, the cosigner can't just sell the asset to pay the balance.

Not exact matches

He points out that you're not selling any assets but rather just transferring the income into your registered product.

For this reason it may just be safer to sell the assets outright in a partial liquidation.

There are some basic decisions you must make like will you offer seller financing; will you sell the entire business entity or just assets; will you keep any assets; will the buyer likely retain or replace staff; will you maintain a minority stake of the ownership; will you be expected to put in a year of transition time after the business is sold.

Woodside Petroleum is selling a series of non-core assets for about $ 170 million, just as a political deal over maritime boundaries in the Timor Sea could clear the way for its $ 5 billion Sunrise gas project to be revived.

We're just slogging away in the traditional investment world,»» says Cordes, who built AssetMark Investment Services to about $ 9 billion in assets, sold it to Genworth Financial Inc. in 2006, and last year was part of an investment group that re-acquired the company.

It's secure, monthly, 95 % passive income that allows me to be retired, live my life for «free» and own appreciating assets I can later sell, 1031 - exchange or just live well off the rents as the properties pay themselves off.

Just as debt deflation diverts income to pay interest and other financial charges — often at the cost of paying so much corporate cash flow that assets must be sold off to pay creditors — so the phenomenon leads to stripping the natural environment.

Maybe our wise and patriotic politicians will start selling off our military assets just like they did with our manufacturing base so they can pay the tsunami of interest on our debt and China will take over as the world's police?

However, as long as the bullion is with the Hard Assets Alliance, all you need to do is log in and sell it just like you would any shares of stock.

EKR Therapeutics, a Cedar Knolls, N.J., specialty pharma founded in 2005, just raised an undisclosed sum in debt and equity financing in order to buy several heart drugs from PDL BioPharma, an unraveling biotech that is selling off assets in a restructuring.

SAN FRANCISCO — The proxy is in, and we've just found out the big golden parachute winners from Yahoo's $ 4.8 billion deal to sell its core assets to Verizon.

a) investing their own money alongside you, so your interests are aligned b) a stake in the company they work at i.e. it is a partnership or employee - owned c) a proven ability to outperform an index over the long - term (at least 10 years) d) reasonable charges — preferably no more than a 1 % management fee and no performance fee e) a concentrated, high conviction portfolio i.e. they do not just hug their benchmark f) a low - asset - turnover ratio i.e. they have a long - term investment horizon and rarely sell investments g) a proven ability to preserve capital during the bad times h) a stable team who have worked together for a number of years.

Assuming that Giustra, Warman and Matysek don't build a company to flip it very quickly for a modest gain, especially when Giustra named it after his mother, my guess is just the PEP property will be sold in an outright buyout, and the remaining assets etc will be spun out, or more likely only the PEP property will be sold for cash, reinforcing a possible war chest of Fiore, enabling them to buy top notch projects.

Just sell your crypto assets for fiat currency or something else; you can profit even in times of crypto market decline.

The old adage of «buy low, sell high» holds for cryptocurrencies just as it holds for any other sort of asset.

For example, although merger control rules are often based on turnover thresholds or combined assets, in some jurisdictions the overall sales of the selling or buying group are looked at, and not just sales relating to the acquired business.

Of course we will turn it down, and that will be the same for Wolfsburg who just spend big money to get Gustavo last season and not in any pressure to sell their prize assets.

The best asset we were suppose to get back from that trade is easily the worst of the three (LaVine), the best was totally dumb luck (THEY KNEW NOTHING ABOUT LAURI, JUST BPA) and I'm still not sold on Dunn as the «PG of the Future».

Just because it can work in computer games doesn't mean the champions of Europe will sell us their prized assets!!!

Although it will be incredibly difficult to ever match his contributions on the pitch, it's vitally important for a former club legend, like Henry, to publicly address his concerns regarding the direction of this club... regardless of those who still feel that Henry has some sort of agenda due to the backlash he received following earlier comments he made on air regarding Arsenal, he has an intimate understanding of the game, he knows the fans are being hosed and he feels some sense of obligation, both professionally and personally, to tell it like he sees it... much like I've continually expressed over the last couple months, this team isn't evolving under this current ownership / management team... instead we are currently experiencing a «stagnant» phase in our club's storied history... a fact that can't be hidden by simply changing the formation or bringing in one or two individuals... this team needs fundamental change in the way it conducts business both on and off the pitch or it will continue to slowly devolve into a second tier club... regardless of the euphoria surrounding our escape act on Friday evening, as it stands, this club is more likely to be fighting for a Europa League spot for the foreseeable future than a top 4 finish... we can't hope for the failures of others to secure our place in the top 4, we need to be the manufacturers of our own success by doing whatever is necessary to evolve as an organization... if Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke can't take the necessary steps following the debacle they manufactured last season, their removal is imperative for our future success... unfortunately, I strongly believe that either they don't know how to proceed in the present economic climate or they are unwilling to do whatever it takes to turn this ship around... just look at the current state of our squad, none of our world class players are under contract beyond this season, we have a ridiculous wage bill considering the results, we can't sell our deadwood because we've mismanaged our personnel decisions and contractual obligations, we haven't properly cultivated our younger talent and we might have become one of the worst clubs ever when it comes to way we handle our transfer business, which under Dein was one of our greatest assets... it's time to get things right!!!

Wanyama joined Celtic in 2011 for just # 900,000 and the Scottish club will be looking for a fee in excess of # 15million to sell their prize asset.

Just two months ago, Coutinho's relationship with his club and their fans was badly frayed after he handed in a transfer request while Barca tried to convince Liverpool to sell their prize asset with bids rising to over # 100 million ($ 132 million).

Incompetence is when a government mismanages the economy so badly that it is compelled to sell a precious national asset like Ghana Telecom just so as to survive.

I just think it's a completely ridiculous policy... you can argue about the right to buy a council house, as it is state money, but there's something deeply wrong about selling off somebody else's assets.»

Unless you're a professional speaker, or using your «# 1 bestselling author» status to sell digital products, coaching or other assets — just hitting # 1 on Amazon won't result in long - term book earnings.

They so how firmly believes Amazon is their direct competitor and if you look at Amazon's assets, they do a lot more than just sell books, digital or print.

They are traded on stock markets but are also bought & sold for the net asset value and one fund can hold many different individual equities — just like a mutual fund.

But if you insist on making a defensive play, then some other things to keep in mind: instead of selling non-retirement funds from one asset class and putting them into another, you can just funnel additional income and new money into the asset classes you'd like most representation in.

They intend to do this by improving the leased percentage in existing facilities, selling off non-core assets, and transitioning to a «just - in - time» building philosophy wherein they know returns with more certainty before building new facilities.

So to me, it is not worth the risk trying to sell a quality asset that is compounding intrinsic value just to try and outsmart other speculators in the near term.

Binary options do not involve buying or selling the actual assets but traders just bet on the price movement of several underlying assets.

And maybe when other asset classes are low, you take that cash to buy the asset classes that are lower, so you're not necessarily selling any securities, you're just taking the dividend and holding that in cash, either to take distributions for income, or to help you with the overall rebalance.

These futures contracts aren't just bought and sold over a single market segment, but over almost any asset that's commonly traded.

You can sell a motif (the full thing) for $ 4.95 or you can sell just one asset in the motif for the same price.

I don't sell off dividend stocks very often, mainly because a dividend paying stock is an asset that should be kept for the long haul and shouldn't be sold for just capital gains.

It just had to stay in business long enough for Lampert to wring out every dollar he could before selling off the company's assets.

While we may tweak the 60/40 asset mix if we believe a bear market is coming, we generally will stick with the 60/40 asset mix since we recognize how difficult is to perfectly time the markets as it requires you to get both the sell and buy just right.

So with the way their code is hard - wired, they're not advocating using actual Asset allocation techniques to reduce risk via diversification, but instead just trying to make it easy for Reps to sell load funds, «According to your financial plan, you need to invest much more today into Income and Growth.

When you buy new things you might sell later, you could consider adding them as assets to keep track of this explicitly (but even then you have problems — the price of things changes with time and you might not want to keep up with those price changes, it's a lot of extra work for a family budget)-- for stuff you already have it's better to treat things as you are doing and just treat the money as income — it's easier and doesn't really change anything — you always had that in equity, some of it was just off the books and now you are bringing it into the books.

It's like an investor who owns a large portion of stocks in one company can't really just say «sell everything» since he will devalue his own assets if he does that.

Graham used the idea of assets of a company and managed to find stocks that were selling significantly below the sum of its assets (e.g. the company could just sell off everything they owned and raise more cash than the total value of their company according to the stock market).

Perhaps there are some other intellectual property assets that might be sold but I just don't see them.

Selling one property to liberate capital and to diversify his assets would be useful with any property: Rental No. 1, a condo, has just $ 23,000 of equity at today's market values, a $ 10,525 annual return but a lot of risk in its $ 217,000 mortgage.

You'll have to pay brokerage commissions to buy and sell them, but you will quickly make these back because of the low management fees, which are just 0.17 % of the fund's assets.

Trouble is, if you fail to execute this strategy at just the right time, or if you buy bonds just when the bond market is retreating, you could easily end on the losing side of both asset classes, selling at a market low and buying back in at a market high.

Just like buying and selling any good that fluctuates in price, you can make money as the stock price of a company stock rises, creating capital gains, or an increase in the value of your assets, which allows you to grow your wealth.

The key idea behind the model is to hedge the option by buying and selling the underlying asset in just the right way and, as a consequence, to eliminate risk.