Sentences with phrase «just start believing in»

All they have to do is recognize the fact that they killed an innocent man and just start believing in him.

You can all just start believing in me now, praying to me... if you'd like me to write down a bunch of stuff that is hard to understand and contradicts itself, I will, but I'll make sure dozens of people get their hands on it first, change it to their liking and to what suits their needs, then pass it off as my original word.

Not exact matches

As the lovely James from Men with Pens and Damn Fine Words recently suggested I try, sit down with a pen and write out some «I Believe» statements on just why you started your journey online in the first place.

Sun's advice to aspiring entrepreneurs: «Just believe in your power and start by making little steps, because you never know what will come out at the end of the tunnel.»

As the leading psychologist on the topic Carol Dweck puts it, «In a growth mindset, people believe their most basic abilities can be developed through dedication and hard work — brains and talent are just the starting point,» whereas people with a fixed mindset believe «their basic qualities, like intelligence are fixed.»

He said, «Patrick, I didn't believe when you started bringing this discipline that if the economy got better, or if there was a big initiative we really wanted to fund, that you would actually give us money for something that's not «in budget,» and just let us do it.»

While the team believes a Bolstr HQ is in the company's future, at these early stages of the start - up the 24/7 work - life mash - up model just didn't pay dividends, concludes Tribbet, and he doubts he's alone in being unable to resist the lure of socializing.

This question is key, because it tunes us into our heart, and that makes the difference between passionately believing in the business you begin and just starting one.

Many sceptics believe we are in the middle of a new Bitcoin bubble while advocates say we are just beginning to see the rise starting.

But starting a company with a newborn wasn't to be taken lightly, and in my own soul - searching, I just realized that I so deeply believed in the importance of flexible work — and having a baby simply reinforced that in a powerful way.

There is no great «sin» that I'm just dying to go commit because I don't believe in judgement or «hell»... if that's the only thing restraining someone, then their heart isn't in the right place to start with.

Once I started to think that this was what Jesus was really about, I wondered if I could do it, as opposed to just believing in blanket forgiveness and focus only on the cross.

For me I see evolution the same as you see God not enough proof to say I believe it and see God as how all things started, in my view evolution of man can be true just that it has not been proven where God I can see because there is no other logical explanation for how the matter in the universe came to be from nothing, a higher power for now can be the only possible answer if science was to prove the creation of the universe in some other way I would not deny that truth.

Of course they won't admit it in public and love to poke fun whenever possible, but deep down they believe, even if it's when they have their first child, or when they reach old age and start to hope that there is more than just this.

historical Jesus, lmfao... show me any historical evidence of jesus... let's start with his remains... they don't exist - your explanation, he rose to the heavens... historical evidence - no remains, no proof of existence (not a disproof either, just not a proof)... then let's start with other historians writing about the life of Jesus around his time or shortly after, as outside neutral observers... that doesn't exist either (not a disproof again, just not a proof)... we can go on and on... the fact is, there is not a single proving evidence of Jesus's life in an historical context... there is no existence of Jesus in a scientific context either (virgin birth... riiiiiight)... it is just written in a book, and stuck in your head... you have a right to believe in what you must... just don't base it on history or science... you believe because you do... it is your right... but try not to put reason into your faith; that's when you start sounding unreasonable, borderline crazy...

I just loved the original Winnie - the - Pooh books by A.A. Milne and all of those chapters started with «In which...» I have always hated titling posts — in fact, for a good long time, I just published essays without titles, if you can believe iIn which...» I have always hated titling posts — in fact, for a good long time, I just published essays without titles, if you can believe iin fact, for a good long time, I just published essays without titles, if you can believe it.

Why do you think, in the last 15 years, it's kind of become acceptable for a generation that was raised to «just believe» to start openly embracing doubt as part of their faith journey?

And when you try to explain that you are not disagree with God, but that you just understand the Bible differently, then they start accusing you of not believing in inspiration, or not believing the Bible is inerrant, or any number of things which completely miss the entire point.

After a while I started to see specifically «one» Christian who just didn't believe in the judgment of God and I started to resent that he had it so easy, I let him know I disapproved and confronted him a few times on it.

Some of what I've researched and confirmed a long time ago is now starting to surface more publicly in newer discoveries so I believe it's probably now only just a matter of time before people as a whole start becoming more aware that what they've always thought and accepted to be true may not necessarily be the case but with that also probably gain a far better understanding of the world around us.

The bible would have taken roughly a century to get into proper circulation, and only two and a bit centuries later, it's quite possible that maybe it grew on some of the Romans and out of remorse, re-considered that they actually were responsible for killing the son of God (in the sense they started to believe him to be), thus Constantine coming around and establishing it as a Rome's primary religion, and how closely apart the dates are, makes me think its considerable evidence than Jesus couldn't have just been a made up figure.

As for me, I can't believe in an human - like being that designed and jump - started the universe 13.8 billion years ago and set aside a planet for His special favorite creations, so He'd have someone to keep Him company and sing songs praising Him, then gave Bronze Age hermits a book of His orders to mankind that includes «thou shalt not round thy head nor cut thy beard» on penalty of eternal suffering... just CA N'T, any more than I can force myself to believe the world rests on the back of giant turtle.

Once I noticed that people were claiming to believe in God just in case there is hell (cowardice in my opinion) is when I started questioning my old religion and eventually not believing in it.

In a way, I got my own seminary education just at the age (10 - 13) when kids are first starting to figure out what they believe, independent of their parents.

If it is good enough for Jesus to be baptised then its good enough reason for me to as well that was why i wanted to be baptised.He says that it was necessary to fulfill all righteousness verse 15 in that sense he could have been talking of fulfilling the requirements of the law and in Jesus we fulfill the requirements of the law.I do nt believe that it is neccesary step to be saved as some of the gentile believers Peter spoke to received the holy spirit before they were baptised.Its a good picture of the old being washed away and we are raised up as a new person in Christ.When i was baptised in the holy spirit and spoke in tongues it was exactly like a water baptism i felt the water washing over me as it washed i just started speaking in tongues.brentnz

Joseph Smith and L. Ron Hubbard showed just how easily the unscrupulous can start a religion and within a short time the simple minded will believe and within a generation they are raising their children to believe so no matter how brilliant and educated individuals in the next generation are, they are being pre-programmed with this nonsense and are unable to shake it.

Then, just as they start stuttering and stammering through some half - @ $ $ attempt to pretend they understand their own bss - ackward behavior, ask them why anyone who believes in SELF - RELIANCE and pulling yourself up by your bootstraps would worship anyone or anything... AT ALL.

Since the start of man, people have also killed over land, power and so on, so it's not just religion; though people typically have an easier time believing some crazy person's claim that they represent their faith in their violent acts... somehow?

If repugs could believe in human achievement and science as much as they believe in a creation myth it would be a start toward becoming a party people othere than old angry white guys (I'm an old white guy, just not angry) could believe in.

You just got ta belileve that 14.5 Billion years ago something started and you got ta have strong faith in your religion to believe that 4.5 billion years ago, nothing exploded in a «big bang» and everything came from that.

why don't you start with why humans invented religion in the first place, the origins of the books of the bible, the multiple «christ» (copied) stories throughout the history of time, fossil evidence of evolution of man and all species, all the discrepancies in the bible, knowledge of all the gods that humans have believed in through recorded history, the political uses of christianity in the time of it's origin, the fact that every other religion has followers who believe just as strongly in their own god / book, that fact that if you had been born in another part of the world you would be a different religion and going to «hell», and that a good, kind, omniscient god wouldn't allow all the suffering and evil to happen, and wouldn't need «help» as christians like to tout... and then we'll get to all these ridiculous fools.

So, before they take off and possibly never see me again, I want to make sure that if they walk away with anything, that it's not me trying to start a friendship, nor trying to explain the sin problem, but instead making clear to them how they can have eternal life as a free gift by just believing in Him for it.

Can you believe it's almost September and school starts in just one week?

I can't believe that Summer is almost over and Fall is just around the corner, but with school getting back in session, college football games starting this week and NFL regular season right around the corner, it seems the time is here.

I can not believe your kids start school in just 3 weeks... granted ours is only a week after that.

We started being linked with Khedira and it looked legit, I was in heaven, I just could not believe it, Bender was mentioned too, I was like weeeeew

As for Giroud I hope what I'm hearing is not true.You get the feeling that once Lacazette starts scoring he just won't like it.He's also another overrated player who's also hear because of Wenger's kindness.Apart from the fact that he's good with his head I don't see the positives of keeping here and even Welbeck.We need players who can push Lacazette to perform and these are just not the players.They are more of rotation players.Do you think if Welbeck and Giroud were at top form they can challenge Laca at his best?I always laugh at our strikers though.On one hand, one doesn't fit our style of play but at least he can finish.On the other hand, the one who fits our style of play can't even score a goal.I can't believe we are joking with such a crucial role.I'm sick and tired of seeing average strikers in the club.It's been painful watching the likes of Bendtner and Chamakh already.Now I have to cope with this.

I've always maintained my stance that Arsene Wenger loves French players in his team than any other players.No matter how average you are once you're French and once you're in the first team he tends to give you so many chances to prove yourself.I can start mentioning them if you want me to but I know you know them.If Lucas Perez was French he wouldn't have been out so early believe me.I just don't know where to begin.Was Giroud bought to become a super sub or to be the leading striker?Having giving us many sesons of failure people are now content with him being a so called super sub.A player like Giroud is not built for that kind of role.He ws a super sub in 99 % of those matches because he was not played when he was supposed to and we needed presence in the air.The funny thing is people are using only this season to label him as a super sub.There were so many matched that Wenger should have started Giroud but for some reason didn't start him.I only see Arsenal as the top club who'd be crying over Giroud.If a good offer comes we should sell.

Or, if you're not completely dejected, you're believing in just one or two of those, and that's enough to make you hope the Reds start over.

I just can't believe that we have become a joke we always start the season well then have a bumpy December and by the time Feb comes our form has taken a dip and we get kicked out of all competitions except for that valuable top 4 that the board loves so much... ultimately if Arsenal want to compete again we need changes from the bottom up... Kroenke and his board need to go cause clearly for them profits matter more than trophies... Wenger needs to go for his lack of tactical naus guy has been using the same fornation since I was in high school and I'm doing my honours in accounting now... our medical team must all go our players always get injured and they never come back in time (take a look at Santi) players like Coquelin Theo Mesut Gabriel Gibbs Giroud just to name a few need to go they're just not good enough seriously these players lack fight tactical Discipline and tactical awareness... at the end of the day change needs to happen things can't keep going like this for us....

I first watched Arsenal in 1976 and have been following home and away ever since NOT 2006, I also don't use twitter and don't play fifa, for the record I really am bored with the insinuation that if you criticise an Arsenal player, the owner or wenger then you don't support Arsenal, are happy with everything that's been going on since say the move to the grove?do you not ever think things should be done differently?did you never criticise a player?if you say no then I don't believe you.I make no hesitation in saying I'm very much on the side of the wenger out brigade, but never would I come on here and write what you've just done, for a start in might upset my seventy year old dad who is very much a AKB.I think you're just a keyboard warrior some how.Regardless though credit where credits due good performance today, and yes I did go

I still believe in Wenger but if I am clearly proven wrong then I will change my opinion, I would just like to start from the top down and go through EVERYONE.

Wenger believes this is just the start: «We feel we have made progress in our consistency, our quality and our stability.»

The Arsenal team that Arsene Wenger picked for the match at Anfield yesterday were absolutely awful in the first half and were extremely lucky to be only 2 goals down at the break, but although some players have complained that they just weren't ready, Wenger believes that the slow start was because they didn't play a game last week, and suffered from «a lack of competition».

why was Sanchez truly playing... no one believes he was too injured to play to start the season, and some like myself would go as far to suggest he wasn't injured at all... so why play him... they can't say it was to appease the fans because when was that ever a factor at this club except when «panic buys» were in the offing... I believe that this was to give Arsenal a little leverage when it comes to negotiating his transfer... just imagine their horrible bargaining position if Sanchez never saw the field before the deadline then heading back to South America and played for Chile... regardless of the facts, this was sadly again another example of a team putting business ahead of fielding a team with the greatest chance to secure 3 points... of course, some will say that Sanchez is, or was, our best player, so obviously he's a no - brainer to start, but those who really watch the game know that his heart hasn't been truly in it for quite some time... even at the end of last season you could see a definitive difference between the Sanchez who played for Chile and the one that played for Arsenal... that being said, 70 % of Sanchez is still better than a 100 % of the vast majority of our remaining roster... shame on you Arsene and shame on you too Sanchez for that telling smirk... I've supported your attempt to push this squad to the next level but don't pretend for a second that you didn't know you were being watched... don't lower your standards or you'll end up like this club, on the outside looking in

Let's be sensible here.Like it or not we have lost Sanchez.We are getting a vast improvement on Walcott in Mikki with (please god) Abua joining as well.Sanchez wanted to go so let's move on.I believe these 2 signings could reignite us and the credit will be with Sven and not Wenger.Soon everyone will start to give credit to Ivan Gaz as without doubt his Catylis For Change is beginning to take effect.12 months ago if we had banked the money for Coq Wally and That Chilean C *** what would we have done with it?Sven M is influencing transfer policy now without doubt.We have no option other than to be patient this season and just take whatever we get from Europa League and Caro Cup.Anything above 6th in Premier League let's take as a bonus.I can't help but believe we are seeing something happening that we are nor used to.

Let's be sensible here.Like it or not we have lost Sanchez.We are getting a vast improvement on Walcott in Mikki with (please god) Abua joining as well.Sanchez wanted to go so let's move on.I believe these 2 signings could reignite us and the credit will be with Sven and not Wenger.Soon everyone will start to give credit to Ivan Gaz as without doubt his Catylis For Change is beginning to take effect.12 months ago if we had banked the money for Coq Wally and That Chilean C *** what would we have done with it?Sven M is influencing transfer policy now without doubt.We have no option other than to be patient this season and just take whatever we get from Europa League and Caro Cup.Anything above 6th in Premier League let's take as a bonus.I can't help but believe we are seeing something happening that we are nor used to.Things are different because Wenger has lost his influence.

I for one believe that it is not about about having a world class striker that wins you a league however having having a world class striker increases your chance of winning a league.Having said that I just hope we go for Icardi or a world class striker or someone who isn't necessarily world class but just knows how to do his job and put it in there.I'd urge Wenger to go for Javier Hernandez or Callum Wilson.They would bang it in and would have world class form because they would have consistent quality support from the midfield.It's all about him being serious and telling himself he can do it.I'm just tired tired of watching that so called striker in our club let alone him starting for us.Its just pathetic.

Also I just pray Walcott is motivated enough next season.He can really be a big player.Injuries have affected him over his ten or so years at Arsenal.It's a shame really.But I still want him to step up.If you can have one so called good season with us I believe in him that he can do it again because in that season he did it using his own legs and brains.I also hope Ramsey and Wilshere motivate themselves greatly as they are very important.I also want Szczesny to go to AS Roma and prove people wrong to become the legendary keeper he's always been destined for.Players who don't deserve starting spots next season must also be checked.Players who don't want to improve and keep doing what they do best for their four or so years they've been here must be sold.

Ramsey NEVER EVER HIDES in a game no matter how badly he is playing.I don't believe Wenger will start with him but if he's on the bench we could just need him a game changer.