Haddad prefers to look beyond
just state test scores to get a full picture of the district's health and its trajectory.
Not exact matches
The letter, written by a top Cuomo aide, says the student
test scores are «unacceptable,» and asks Board of Regents Chancellor Merryl Tisch and outgoing Education Commissioner John King what to do about an evaluation system that rates
just 1 percent of all of the teachers in the
state as poorly performing.
The lawmakers, concerned with a backlash not
just from the teachers but in some cases from vocal parent - constituents, appear to have followed the union's lead: The moratorium, which has been a major legislative priority of New York
State United Teachers, would essentially hold harmless teachers, principals and students from low
test scores on Common Core - aligned exams for two years.
In 2011, the second year of more rigorous
scoring of
state standardized
tests, achievement dipped slightly across the
state, according to figures
just released by the
state education department.
In one study of 1,651 high school students from three
states, reading ability was
just as important to students» science - class grades and
scores on
state - level science
tests as the amount of science knowledge they had.
These lessons focus primarily on the transparency of the systems, but this is
just one of several principles that
states should attend to (which I have offered previously): Accountability systems should actually measure school effectiveness, not
just test scores.
In a profession that already feels under siege, the decision in most
states — encouraged by the U.S. Department of Education — to press ahead with using student
test scores as a significant component of a teacher's evaluation «
just fuels the perception that we care more about weeding out weak teachers than giving the vast majority of teachers the time and support they need to make a successful transition to Common Core,» says Schwartz.
But for Core proponents, the timing couldn't be worse:
Just as
states began implementing the new standards, 40
states receiving No Child waivers are also launching new systems to evaluate teachers, which will incorporate some measures of student achievement, including, where available,
scores from standardized
tests.
Still, its detractors argue that the law has had unfortunate side effects: too much time spent teaching to narrow
tests, schools focused on boosting the
scores of students who are
just below the proficiency threshold, and some
states lowering their standards to reduce the number of schools missing their achievement targets.
With
states now appropriately crafting accountability frameworks that focus not
just on
test scores but on multiple measures, we also will hear less heated rhetoric about the consequences of poor results.
Our sample size was 271
test scores across 44
states, not
just 44 as Hanushek implies.
Merseth says the aim isn't
just to create a charter that must meets
state guidelines and
scores well on standardized
tests but also to focus on the qualitative, social, moral, and emotional questions facing school design.
The percentage of students
scoring at or above grade level on the
state's proficiency
tests has risen from 56 percent to nearly 75 percent in
just six years.
The law requires that
states consider additional measures beyond
just test scores to assess student progress and school quality.
Michael, DQC has long advocated on the 10 Essential Elements of a
state data system...
state test scores are
just one of ten elements!
In California, 75 % of white third - grade students who attend public schools without the minimum threshold number of ELL students perform at or above the proficient level on the
state's mathematics assessment
test, whereas
just 67 % of the white California third - graders who attend schools with the minimum threshold number of ELL students
score at or above the proficient level.
Commerce High, on the other hand, has 1,100 students — and is
just one step away from a
state takeover, despite improvements in its
test scores.
A big change seen in about half the
states is a focus on growth — how fast
test scores are moving and in which direction, not
just how many kids have passed a specific
score on the
tests.
The law required that
states report more than
just average
test scores.
The problem stems from parents» concern that their own children might be denied promotion or graduation based on a
test score; from voters» confusion when their own upscale suburban schools are deemed to be failing by
state or federal accountability systems even though most of the graduates do
just fine; and from frustration when parents — often prompted by teachers — conclude that the basic - skills
testing regime yields too much «drill and kill,» too little flexibility, and insufficient attention to art, music, and other creative disciplines.
In addition, the law creates flexibility for
state and local leaders to think creatively — beyond
just test scores and graduation rates — about how to measure school quality.
Connecticut
just released new
state test scores, and we've heard a lot from different groups, educators, parents, and elected officials on what the results mean.
The study,
just completed, compared
test scores of 46,000 charter school [fourth - grade] students in 20
states and the District — almost every student attending the special schools with fewer restrictions than traditional public schools.
For example, ESSA requires
states to include a broader set of factors in school accountability systems rather than
just test scores; provides funding for
states and districts to audit and streamline their
testing regimes; and allows
states to cap the amount of instructional time devoted to
testing.
States can also develop new ways to
test through project - based assessments and use student growth, meaning student improvement year to year, rather than
just a standalone proficiency
score to measure school quality.
So far, Connecticut, Delaware, Louisiana, and Tennessee, and other
states «can use science
test scores,» but «they
just can't be part of the «academic achievement» indicator.»
The manual for the SAT - 10, which CPS used last year to retain students,
states that
test scores «should be
just one of the many factors considered and probably should receive less weight than factors such as teacher observation, day - to - day classroom performance, maturity level, and attitude» —
just the kind of information in report cards.
The Forum on Educational Accountability has produced a blueprint to rewrite the law to focus on improving schools not
just inflating
state test scores.»
The
test score issue comes as California's school accountability system is undergoing a broad revision, as the Brown administration and
state schools chief Tom Torlakson search for more achievement measures than
just test scores.
We are now
just one year past the federal passage of the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), within which it is written that
states must no longer set up teacher - evaluation systems based in significant part on their students»
test scores.
In addition, the full use of
state test scores in certain teacher evaluations will proceed as planned for the year
just completed.
Republican - controlled
states like Texas began working to reduce the role of
testing across the education system,
just as Cuomo was pushing to increase
scores» weight in New York.
The true measure of student proficiency, educator effectiveness, and school quality must be based on more than
just students»
test scores on a few
state standardized
tests.
In WSI schools that effectively implement arts integration, a higher percentage of economically disadvantaged students
score «Proficient or Above» when compared to all students (not
just economically disadvantaged students) at the district and
state level, across multiple grade levels, and across multiple subject areas on standardized
tests.
Connecticut Gov. Dannel Malloy has
just asked for a «pause» in implementation of a controversial new teacher evaluation system that uses student standardized
test scores to assess teachers as well creation of a task force to study the implementation of the Common Core
State Standards.
Just as soon as the
state's new
test scores were released — and even before, in the case of mayoral candidate Bill de Blasio — reactions started flying about the sobering news about student achievement in New York.
But given a different
test recently introduced to help evaluate more teachers like her, again in the primary grades for which no other
state - level
tests exist (like in grades 3 - 8),
just this year she «received a growth
score of 1, [after which she] was placed on a list of ineffective teachers needing additional coaching.»
Today is day two of of the three - day New York
State English Language Arts Exam and in my ten - plus years of proctoring and
scoring these exams, it never ceases to amaze me when,
just a few minutes into the
tests, students» eyes start to glaze over and their bladders and throats go into overdrive, causing... Continue reading Students: You Take the
Test; Don't Let the
Test Take You!
It required schools to publish their
scores on
state tests not
just as averages, but broken down by students» race, sex and other groups, a rule that most educators agree has focused attention on narrowing achievement gaps.
State board President Michael Kirst and other members have made it clear that they intend to replace the API, which calculates a three - digit number based primarily on a school's or district's standardized
test scores, with a new system in which
test scores would be
just one of many measures of student achievement and school performance.
They never get around to explaining why
test scores just released by New York
State show 94 percent of Eva Moskowitz's Success Academy students — almost all minority — passed the 2016 math exam and 82 percent passed the reading exam.
Gist, whose reform efforts led to the firings of all teachers and staff at one of the
state's worst - performing schools, said
test scores in the
state need vast improvement, the graduation rate must grow and too few high school graduates —
just more than half — are heading directly to college.
In fact, we are not
just the most segregated in the country, the
state has now imposed a practice of divide and conquer, segregate and close.Closures, if you do not know, are based on the
test score outcomes.
If you
just focus on raising
test scores, some teachers say, «Well, I get the best
test scores in the district or the
state, so why should I improve?»
The math
scores are even more discouraging, with
just 16 percent of voucher and public school students passing
state tests.
In fact, the Every Student Succeeds Act he signed last December will also require
states to measure school and district performance on more than
just test scores.
Additionally, this same group of students was able to move from 34 percent
scoring at the «unsatisfactory» level on the
state ELA
test to
just 18 percent being at that level the following year, a decrease of approximately 50 percent.
On average, Crown Prep's students increase two years in their reading level within
just the first 9 months of attending the school, and in science, 72 % of their fifth graders
scored proficient or advanced on
state tests.
Now, 15
states have policies that base teacher tenure partly on student
test scores, up from eight
just a year earlier, according to a report released Monday by the advocacy group, StudentsFirst.
In
just the past three academic years, FairTest has documented confirmed cases of
test score manipulation in 33
states plus the District of Columbia.