Sentences with phrase «just used less energy»

Not exact matches

Sleep deprivation (even just getting less than six hours a night) is a kind of chronic stress that impairs how the body and brain use energy.

The experimental method uses graphene, and researchers at MIT have managed to create a super-thin graphene membrane just one atom thick, which they say will make reverse osmosis easier, less energy - intensive, and cheaper.

«Just to take one example,» Lusk writes, «Londoners would use less energy and emit fewer emissions if they bought lamb raised half a world away, in New Zealand, rather than locally.»

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

With more money for development of novel designs and public financial support for construction — perhaps as part of a clean energy portfolio standard that lumps in all low - carbon energy sources, not just renewables or a carbon tax — nuclear could be one of the pillars of a three - pronged approach to cutting greenhouse gas emissions: using less energy to do more (or energy efficiency), low - carbon power, and electric cars (as long as they are charged with electricity from clean sources, not coal burning).

Whether it's cleaning your air filter, switching to a smart thermostat device, or just getting outside, there are plenty of simple and efficient ways that you can do your part to use less energy this season.

When your cells swell, it makes your muscles create more protein and destroy less to use for energy, which means that swelling isn't just cosmetics — it's muscle growth as well.

I FEEL a lot better (more energy, less irritable, etc.) but my somewhat regular 7 week cycles just changed this past cycle to a 9 + week, with pain that feels like a cyst (I never used to actually have cysts, so hard to say) and spotting.

Your body is only going to find the calories that weren't stored as fat as easily usable, so basically you'll have much less energy to be used than what you just consumed.

Dr. Joe Kahn: CoQ10 is a very powerful antioxidant and because oxygen is being used in the mitochondria in the process of producing ATP energy molecule, the mitochondria is very sensitive to oxidant stress and CoQ10 is an anti-oxidant and about age forty we just start producing dramatically less and less CoQ10 every decade of our lives.

To be sure, the best and most effective advice for saving money on utilities really is just to use less energy.

When it comes to energy efficiency, the staff must be aware that just because a product uses less power does not necessarily mean it is energy efficient.

The MV100 Tower and the MZ100 Slim Tower both use just 60 W while operating in power - save mode, and just 1 W when in stand - by mode — that's less than many energy - sparing LCD monitors.

It just uses so much less material, so much less embodied energy.

The access devices use about 95 % less energy than a regular PC — roughly 1 - 4 watts per device — and with the potential of as many as 30 people all using just an access device and shared PC, that means some intense energy savings.

I can build the same size home (timber frame) using sips on a foundation for a lot less than $ 200.00 per sq. ft.. It is going to be just as energy efficient as the one in the article and even more so since it doesn't need a fuel guzzling truck to move it.

Favorable energy economics are just one of solar's many benefits — including less water use, lack of requirement for a centralized grid in undeveloped regions, low cost, zero air pollution, and in providing a mitigation for the rising problem of global climate change (which is primarily driven by human fossil fuel burning).

Although the number of homes increased 45 percent to 111.1 million by 2005, they used significantly less energy for heating — just 4.30 quads.

Thermal equilibrium doesn't mean the same temperature, if for example, a gas in getting hotter expands and rises becoming less dense and under less pressure it can move faster, it's using thermal energy to move, there's no energy lost, it's just become something else, or, as temperature relates to kinetic energy not thermal energy then heat capacity comes into play, as water can absorb a huge amount of thermal energy before there's any rise in temperature, or whatever, but if you're equating all «energy» to «heat» as thermal energy then that's a different idea altogether, not all energy is heat.

And so it does mean that overall, we use less energy and that's bringing up this fascinating situation a very large power plant like Diablo Canyon that's running just fine economic.

While the house is very energy efficient, solar heated, uses less material and labor, it also just looks really nice.

Theoretically mankind could bypass agriculture for our food if we could just convert energy straight into food by some more efficient method and we would use a lot less energy as a consequence..

Impacts of carbon taxes on poor families can be lessened by: 1) progressive tax - shifting as just described; 2) pro-rata distribution of the carbon tax revenues to every U.S. resident (also described above); and / or 3) to the extent necessary, funding programs designed to help poorer households use less energy driving and at home.

Punishers of the Poor Some politicians like higher energy prices because it forces Americans to use less energy and adopt a lower standard of living — just what environmental extremists want.

France could buy used fuel rods from the US power reactors for less than nothing, and just remove the fission products to make a fuel that has far more energy than the fuel normaly used by the Canadians.

Would they consider themselves worse off, or better off, living in a better home just because they use less energy?

Another challenge: to convince government and industry that older buildings shouldn't just be preserved for sentimental or historic reasons, but because they are actually using less energy and are easier and cheaper to upgrade than building new.

Some of us in the green community want to use less energy and water just because we feel it's the best thing to do for the planet, and some of us want to use less because it also leads to saving money.

Energy is just an input, a variable; the fact that a comfortable building will use a lot less of it is a happy coincidence.

As a result the scenario features more than 9 billion people enjoying a much higher GDP than today's 7 billion in 2050 while using less energy not just per capita, but overall.

Although solar (mainly PV) is the largest single energy source by that time, total carbon consumed through fossil fuel use amounts to 800 billion tonnes carbon by the end of the century, just a bit less than current proven reserves (900 billion tonnes as indicated above).

Well - to - wheel, using hydrogen produced from natural gas to feed a fuel cell produces 30 % — 50 % less carbon dioxide than just burning the fuel to provide the same amount of energy.»

The current energy imbalance (just a little less than 1 W / m2) implies that the planet would need to warm by ~ 1 x S / 3.7 ºC to restore an equilibrium, and using the standard climate sensitivity of 3ºC for a doubling of CO2, implies a committed warming of 0.8 ºC or so.

Indeed, it could be more eco-friendly than just the energy efficiency — if it is that appealing for hip environments, then that means less materials used for light shades:

Though I might prefer using the evapolar at night near my bed as i don't need an entire room to be cooled, just the area where i sleep or work, it is much quieter and probably uses a lot less energy.

The panel is also just as bright as the previous - gen model, but uses 30 percent less energy, according to Apple.

Dreher remains optimistic that a potential 10 % to 15 % cost savings will help retailers see the light — preferably one that shines just as brightly while using less energy.