«The Bronx Documentary Center is very focused on journalism and photojournalism, with a social -
justice approach rather than for art's sake,» says Lanzo.
Not exact matches
It remains laissez - faire in its
approach to social welfare and
justice, and justifies this stance by claiming the state has no ability (
rather than no right or no reason) to intervene in such matters.
Critics see the combination of program accreditation standards, revised by the National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE) in 2000; a growing curricular emphasis on «social
justice» issues; and a left - leaning education professoriate as yielding a one - sided
approach to teacher education and the certification of teachers based on ideology,
rather than teaching skills or mastery of content knowledge.
Progressives tend to favor pedagogical
approaches in the classroom such as «child - centered» instruction and «teaching for social
justice,»
rather than rigorous academic content.
One final remark that arises from this case, is that although the Court is willing to use Article 47 CFR to provide greater access to
justice before national courts, its
approach towards standing in direct actions by individuals on the basis of Article 263 (4) TFEU appears to remain
rather conservative, regardless of the inclusion of the Charter since Lisbon.
Such an
approach could also address the doubts of some UK commentators that the joint court would merely be a proxy for the Court of
Justice,
rather than being a truly impartial body for arbitration on an international agreement.
In
Justice Stratas's view, judges and academics too often take a results - oriented
approach to the law,
rather than rigorously applying legal doctrine.
Unless lawyers adopt the same
approach, taking into account their clients» means and the nature of the case, access to
justice will continue to be frustrated,
rather than facilitated.
Rather than treating everyone the same, substantive equality is an
approach that recognizes and celebrates differences and ensures that historically disadvantaged people can actively participate in society and access
justice.
My real fear is that this relentless pace of family fee reform is flawed; as the
Justice Committee concluded: «The late commissioning of research, which should have been undertaken before formulating proposals, suggests an attempt to find support for conclusions already reached,
rather than a genuinely evidence - based
approach to reform.»
[83] The holistic
approach of
Justices Lee and North, by contrast, allows room for the regulation, control, curtailment, restriction, suspension and postponement,
rather than extinguishment of native title.