Martha has been a great friend of YLAL and was on the panel for the access to
justice debate at our 10th anniversary event in April 2015.
Not exact matches
If copies of the book start to appear in the
Justice Department and on law school syllabi, Eisinger could spark important debate about why — at a time when so many people struggle to obtain basic procedural rights in the criminal justice system — white - collar defendants manage to consistently evade its
Justice Department and on law school syllabi, Eisinger could spark important
debate about why —
at a time when so many people struggle to obtain basic procedural rights in the criminal
justice system — white - collar defendants manage to consistently evade its
justice system — white - collar defendants manage to consistently evade its grasp.
I found Mgr Burke's article on
justice to be a very relevant and thought - provoking topic of
debate and discussion for our society
at the moment.
This post looks
at the two sides of the social
justice debate, and then suggests a third middle way on social
justice issues.
On the other side of the social
justice debate are those who argue that social
justice issues are
at the center of the Gospel, and that as we look
at the life and ministry of Jesus, we see Him engaged in social
justice actions
at every turn.
Tuesday Questions - HM Treasury Ten minute rule motion - Food labelling (Halal and Kosher Meat) Motions: Relating to Section 5 of the European Communities (Amendment) Act 1993, EU directive on data protection in the areas of police and criminal
justice Debate: General debate on the National Planning Policy framework Adjournment debate: Jobs at Group
Debate: General
debate on the National Planning Policy framework Adjournment debate: Jobs at Group
debate on the National Planning Policy framework Adjournment
debate: Jobs at Group
debate: Jobs
at Group Lotus
The suggestion was met with loud boos from the crowd gathered
at the House of
Justice for a
debate with Democratic mayoral candidates hosted by Rev. Al Sharpton on Martin Luther King Jr.'s birthday.
«The government has ignored the CJEU's [court of
justice at the European Union] ruling and denied the public a proper parliamentary
debate about a law that will violate our human rights,» executive director Jim Killock said.
«If they want to challenge the incumbent surely the basis of natural
justice and the British sense of fair play, that incumbent has to be in a position to defend themselves in the arena of
debate so that the 250,000 people who voted for him less than 10 months ago
at least have their say, that's surely the right way to do this,» he told the Today programme.
Jack Straw, the
justice secretary, wants Wright's committee to look
at the possibility of using well - supported public e-petitions on specific issues as a way of requiring MPs to hold
debates on issues that matter to voters.
On Tuesday, Taylor walked onto the chamber floor
at 5:52 p.m., as Keith Wright and Al Graf entered the third hour of racially tinged
debate about criminal
justice issues and changes that should be made after the fatal arrest of Eric Garner.
The former Tory leader is the magazine's Campaigner of the year for his success
at putting social
justice at the heart of the public
debate.
That could give Democrats some leverage when it comes time to negotiate criminal
justice reforms - but, there are so many other major issues
at stake for Democrats including a minimum wage increase, renewing mayoral control of schools, the sunset of rent laws, and The DREAM Act, that there is a chance that the
debate could be overshadowed yet again.
While the players in this multibillion - dollar drama wrangled over
Justice DeGrasse's order last winter, the question
at the heart of the New York case was the one
debated across the country: Will more money improve children's education or simply feed an already bloated and ineffectual bureaucracy?
Art,
Justice and Terror is a day of discussion and
debate curated by London College of Communication, University of the Arts London, in response to War of Terror, a solo show
at Imperial War Museum London by Edmund Clark.
Amid contentious
debate surrounding the gray areas and boundaries of sexual abuse sparked by the #metoo movement, an exhibition about domestic violence
at the Anya and Andrew Shiva Gallery
at John Jay School of Criminal
Justice lays bare the plight of individuals who have suffered direct physical abuse.
As Andrea Fraser brings Sing Sing to the Whitney and presidential candidates
debate reform of the criminal
justice system, we
at Artspace have been pondering the history of incarceration in art.
Because
debates about climate change policy formation
at the national level have often ignored questions of equity and fairness, there is a need to publicize how
debates at the national level about proposed climate change policies acknowledge or ignore questions of equity, ethics, and distributive
justice.
Ensure that you're aware of what's in NLJ (in print and online
at www.newlawjournal.co.uk) to keep up - to - date with leading comment, opinion and
debate in the civil
justice arena.
In my view, that duty ought to be understood to
at least require that the
debate on ABSs and access to
justice include consideration of possible means for ensuring that the new and improved services ABSs are expected to develop will benefit not just the middle class, but people living on low income as well.
If we take
Justice Stratas
at his word,
Justice Abella's summary dismissal of the importance of the standard of review
debate is downright disturbing.
Although it was a serious
debate, there were jokes all around
at the University of Toronto Faculty of Law's Grand Moot on Oct. 6 — especially from Supreme Court of Canada
Justice Rosalie Abella, who is known for her humour.
How much information it's appropriate for a blawger to reveal about the matters on which he's working, morally, ethically, and according to the dictates of common sense, is a subject of much
debate, some of which is hosted by Scott Greenfield
at Simple
Justice.
Which contrasts markedly with the
debate between
Justices Scalia and Kennedy on foreign law that we commented on
at http://www.slaw.ca/2005/09/08/comparative-law-4/#comments.
As president of the Law Society of England and Wales from July she will be
at the forefront of
debates with the Ministry of
Justice and HM Courts and Tribunals Service over the government's plans for online j
Justice and HM Courts and Tribunals Service over the government's plans for online
justicejustice.
I was
at the Cambridge Lectures in July 1981, when both the Chief
Justice and
Justice Estey absented themselves from a dinner
at which three Attorneys General (Chrétien, McMurtry and Romanow) chaired by the Canadian High Commissioner (the elder) Paul Martin,
debated patriation.
Chief
Justice Drapeau stated that he expects the issue will be «fully
debated»
at Oland's retrial, and that the burden of presenting any independent evidence will be on the prosecutors.
On Wednesday 10 May 2017, Young Legal Aid Lawyers (YLAL) held a pre-general election
debate at Garden Court Chambers in London on Access to
Justice After the Election, with representatives of the main political parties setting out their respective policies on legal aid and access to j
Justice After the Election, with representatives of the main political parties setting out their respective policies on legal aid and access to
justicejustice.
Sir james Munby (President of the family courts) also said
at the Family
Justice Council
debate «The only thing I am confident about is that adoption as we will understand it and practise it in 30 years» time will bear very little relation to adoption as we practise it today.»
On appeal, Lord
Justice Lloyd, giving the judgment of the court, said that there was scope for
debate about the ambit of Lord Cooke's speech and doubted Lord Cooke was saying, as a straightforward proposition, that unless there is notice before the remedial works are undertaken, there is no cause of action for recovery of any damages
at all.
Justice Hackland commented
at para 73 on the accused's demeanor, who appeared «quite naive, immature and inarticulate» despite being an intelligent physician, and was the «type of person who would «go with the flow» and avoid
debate or confrontation while a guest in the home of someone who should otherwise have been confronted.»
And this is what I understand to be the meaning of our lawyers, when they say that these civil corporations are liable to no visitation; that is, that the law having by immemorial usage appointed them to be visited and inspected by the king their founder, in his majesty's court of king's bench, according to the rules of the common law, they ought not to be visited elsewhere, or by any other authority.53 And this is so strictly true, that though the king by his letters patent had subjected the college of physicians to the visitation of four very respectable persons, the lord chancellor, the two chief
justices, and the chief baron; though the college had accepted this carter with all possible marks of acquiescence, and had acted under it for near a century; yet, in 1753, the authority of this provision coming in dispute, on an appeal preferred to these supposed visitors, they directed the legality of their own appointment to be argued: and, as this college was a mere civil, and not an eleemosynary foundation, they
at length determined, upon several days solemn
debate, that they had no jurisdiction as visitors; and remitted the appellant (if aggrieved) to his regular remedy in his majesty's court of king's bench.
It is now nearly nine months since the master of the rolls, Lord Neuberger, declared
at the launch of Lord
Justice Jackson's final report, that the «time for discussion and
debate is over».
This
debate basically opposed those who believe that access to
justice is the only true goal (and that if this is gained
at the expense of lawyers, so be it), and those who can not imagine a world without lawyers.
[1] Commonwealth, Parliamentary
Debates, House of Representatives, 13 February 2008, p 167 (The Hon Kevin Rudd MP, Prime Minister)[2] T Calma, Essentials for Social
Justice: The Future (Speech delivered
at the Hawke Centre, University of South Australia, Adelaide, 12 November 2008).
In 2009, speaking
at the Canadian Bar Association's annual conference, the then minister of
justice and attorney general, now defence minister, was asked his position on equal parenting and the bill we are now
debating.