Not exact matches
Both are weighty
issues that deal explicitly with «high cosmic
justice,» so if he argues that a government overreaches its authority to execute
justice by attempting to «balance the books of the universe» in repaying blood with blood,
then does that mean there can never be any just criteria for one nation to retaliate against another after an unprovoked attack» an attack that in essence would repay blood with blood?
Since
then, she has earned a Masters in Social
Justice and directed a short - term missions site on the west - side of Chicago, where she created interactive opportunities for young people to engage
issues of poverty, injustice, and race.
Yet if the most important development in that doctrine in Caritas in Veritate is a strong linkage of the life
issues to Catholic social -
justice concerns,
then it is also true that the challenge of this particular encyclical falls more sharply on those who believe that Roe v. Wade was rightly decided, and remedied an injustice in prior American law.»
I think for me, I try to think about the
justice issues that are optional for me — and
then press myself to «opt - in.»
This post looks at the two sides of the social
justice debate, and
then suggests a third middle way on social
justice issues.
Since
then, she has worked with national speaker and consultant Rev. Dr. Brenda Salter McNeil, earned a Masters in Social
Justice, and directed a short - term missions site on the west - side of Chicago, where she created interactive opportunities for young people to engage
issues of poverty, injustice and race.
This, according to them was because «the
issue that came before the Supreme Court was simply constitutional interpretation so for (with all respect) the learned judge (
Justice Jones Dotse) to go beyond the constitutional interpretation and
then decide that the applicant had no contract with the government and therefore the applicant had no case and that the applicant had formed an alliance to create, loot and share was beyond what was before the business of the Supreme Court.»
My interest in this whole
issue comes from the fact that if our law courts especially the highest court in Ghana, Supreme Court that is supposed to be final place in the country to deliver
justice to all manner of persons regardless of one's political affiliation, religious beliefs, ethnic background etc in a just and fair manner is now seen to be turning into a place where citizens of Ghana who may belong to certain political affiliations do not feel confident or have trust in their handling of critical national
issues in view of some of these «partisan» pronouncements on the part of some
justices,
then where would we be heading towards as a country?
In a 5 to 4 decision those
justices ruled that the Second Amendment gives Americans the right to own guns for personal self - defense, despite the amendment's opening language - «A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state,» - which pretty clearly says that gun ownership was specifically preserved by the founding fathers in the interest of the common defense against a tyrannical government (remember, this was the
issue on their minds back
then).
If we let Obama lose,
then Dems will fire up United For Peace and
Justice and their fake antiwar candidates, and make lots of noise about our privacy rights, so those
issues will be raised.
She added: «Of course it's a medical problem, I mean addiction is a medical problem, and it becomes a public health problem and
then our society is choosing to treat that as a criminal
justice issue.»
Justice Adeniyi Ademola of Federal High Court 6
then adjourned the case to Wednesday last week for ruling on the two
issues being sought by both prosecution and defence but the court failed to sit on that day because of a seminar organised for judges by the National Judicial Institute (NJI).
Fishers Island
Justice Louisa Evans said residents are asking for someone who can gather information to give to the Island Community Board, which would
then find a consensus on what
issues are most important.
The Presidency on Wednesday said there was no truth in the reports that a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Kola Awodein, gave
Justice Niyi Ademola of the Federal High Court, currently standing trial for alleged corruption, N500, 000.00 at the behest of President Muhammadu Buhari during the certificate
issue affecting the
then presidential candidate of the All Progressives Congress.
Legal experts say that if a prima facie case is established against any of the commissioners during the preliminary investigation, the Chief
Justice, per the rules, will
then set up a committee to fully investigate the
issues and a report submitted to the president.
Then he
issues a warning to Nick: Either fix the flawed
justice system that failed his family, or key players in the trial will die.
Batman v Superman might already sound like a decent number of superheroes for a single movie just in the title alone, but add in Wonder Woman and
then all the other DC characters who are supposed to appear to set up
Justice League, and you're going to run into some logistical
issues.
Wyatt exited the film because of scheduling
issues, while Liman left to direct Warner Bros.»
Justice League Dark, which he
then also left.
If an organization raised $ 1,000,000, and
then put $ 100,000 into savings, spent $ 1,000 on climate change
issues and $ 899,000 on tax reform, criminal
justice reform, and Medicare reform, the group's entire $ 1 million income was included in the Brulle Number.
Lord
Justice Thorpe characterised the failure to obtain a court order, ie
issue an application under ChA 1989, s 15 and Sch 1 on a Form C1 and
then settle it as an order on the terms agreed, as a «surprising feature» of the case (para 35).
It follows that the
issue then becomes whether the exemptions under the Court Rules Act can be interpreted so that they are consistent with the common law right of access to civil
justice, which is preserved, as the Attorney General submits, by the Court Rules Act.
Baron J reviewed the authorities on
issue estoppel and found herself in agreement with Re B and another (minors)(care proceedings: evidence)[1997] 1 FLR 285, [1997] 2 All ER 29 and Mrs
Justice Hale (as she
then was) that
issue estoppel in children cases, in any strict sense, does not apply.
A new website aims to help bridge the
justice gap for veterans by helping them identify
issues in their lives for which there may be a legal remedy and
then helping them identify the steps they can take to pursue that remedy.
[5] In A Roadmap for Change,
then -
Justice Cromwell's Action Committee on Access to
Justice in Civil and Family Matters devoted two of its nine goals to
issues of research and funding.
In the case of «C», Underhill J, sitting alone, in support of his ruling that the statutory conditions for the
issue of a search warrant «must be conscientiously complied with», referred to a 1972 judgment (Williams v Summerfield [1972] 2 QB 512, [1972] 2 All ER 1334) of the
then Lord Chief
Justice, Lord Widgery, where he said:
Hasan notes that the
issue of suspended declarations was dealt with in Schachter in 1992, where
then chief
justice Antonio Lamer suggested the implications of preserving an unconstitutional law — even temporarily — demand that suspensions be used rarely.
In order to give manageable form to the
issue, the problem of limited access to
justice is often deconstructed and
then approached again as a problem of limited access to legal services.
At
issue was a letter now housed in Library and Archives Canada written by
then -
Justice (later Chief
Justice) Lyman Poore Duff in 1924 to the British judge Lord Haldane, known in some circles as the «wicked stepfather of the Canadian constitution» because of his role in neutering federal economic regulatory authority in division of powers cases.
Chief
Justice Bauman
then turned to the evidentiary
issues associated with the appeal.
As I predicted, the Court unanimously (through
Justice Ginsburg, who cares most deeply about these
issues) held that FRAP 4 (a)(5)(C)'s 30 - day limit on extensions to file notices of appeal was not jurisdictional,
then punted
issues of waiver, forfeiture, and equitable exception to the Seventh Circuit for initial consideration.
The critical question,
then, is not whether the dog sniff occurs before or after the officer
issue a ticket, as
JUSTICE ALITO supposes, post, at 2 - 4, but whether conducting the sniff «prolongs» — i.e., adds time to — «the stop,» supra, at 6.»
It would
then issue recommendations for «changes in oversight, policies, practices, and laws to reduce crime, increase public safety and promote confidence in the criminal
justice system.»
(If the bill was introduced in the Senate and amendments are made by Senators,
then the Minister of
Justice should
issue an addendum to the government statement of compatibility at First Reading in the House.)
Yet
Justice Veldhuis does seem to acknowledge there is an arguable point on whether the 8000 resident threshold is merely an aspirational target or a hard cap (at para 41) but
then goes on to more or less crunch the numbers and conclude this development project is not going to push Banff over 8000 permanent residents and therefore this
issue has no chance of success on appeal (at paras 42 - 44).
During the four months from
then until the CJC's
Justice Neil Wittmann
issued the first decision on the matter (on January 5, 2011), there was extensive media commentary on the story, especially by the CBC.
If the information, as presented, fails to satisfy the
Justice that there are reasonable grounds for the charge,
then no process is
issued (as in a summons to court or an arrest warrant) and the charge is not initiated.
If a
Justice is satisfied there are reasonable grounds,
then process is
issued and a charge is laid.
The idea for this paper came about one morning as I sat in Chambers watching
Justice D. K. Miller address an ex juris asset
issue, where he ordered the Wife to instruct her counsel in Zimbabwe to effect a sale of land, and to
then pay those proceeds to counsel in Alberta.
Justice Cromwell
then addressed the
issue of the Bedford litigation, and pointed out that Bedford did not raise ss.
[99] As Mr.
Justice Finch (as he
then was) explained in Halfway River at para. 58, the fettering of discretion is an
issue of procedural fairness, which is an area where the court owes an administrative decision - maker no deference:
«I'm arguing we need to keep the current Budget figures and
then we can start reallocating (savings) to certain areas that we need: education, jobs, looking at the
justice issues and so on.»