Not exact matches
Raisman's passion for
justice emphasizes the reality that Nassar's abuse
did not exist in a vaccum — and that targeting female athletes is a longstanding, systemic
issue.
On Tuesday, President Trump ordered the
Justice Department to
issue regulations that would ban bump stocks, after pressure to
do more to curtail access to deadly weapons following the Florida shooting.
«Our conviction that Sino - Forest is a fraud has not wavered since we
issued our report, and we look forward to seeing
justice done,» Block said Friday.
In a statement
issued yesterday, before the ban was enacted, Uber CEO Travis Kalanick emphasized the company would
do everything it can to bring the perpetrator to
justice.
The judge said in a 91 - page decision that, while the Army Corps substantially complied with the National Environmental Policy Act, federal permits
issued for the pipeline violated the law in some respects, saying in a court order the Corps
did not «adequately consider the impacts of an oil spill on fishing rights, hunting rights, or environmental
justice.»
But given that several individual racial
justice groups, as well as larger collectives like the Movement for Black Lives and the police - reform oriented Campaign Zero initiative, have all come out with various policy agendas targeting specific
issues, this doesn't really hold up.
And the great thing is that with our religious freedom, they don't have to wait to find the right church to take on social
justice issues.
People have the right to leave church and organized religion, they have a right to question an institution that will
do anything to save face even if it means letting children be harmed (and trust me, there are Priests that have
issues with girls - my mom when to an all girls» Catholic school in the 60s and talks about how many of the priests used to «hang out» with the young girls out and girls have been abused), churches that are not practicing social
justice.
Amnesty International is up to no good, and they don't want you to know about it.My friend Richard Stith, professor of law at Valparaiso University, first drew my attention to the
issue on the Mirror of
Justice blog about a year ago.
We can not
do Prager's argument
justice here, but readers who are weary of the propaganda of gay promotion and gay bashing alike might write for this
issue of Ultimate
Issues.
Both are weighty
issues that deal explicitly with «high cosmic
justice,» so if he argues that a government overreaches its authority to execute
justice by attempting to «balance the books of the universe» in repaying blood with blood, then
does that mean there can never be any just criteria for one nation to retaliate against another after an unprovoked attack» an attack that in essence would repay blood with blood?
Because the truth is that we
do all start from different places on different
issues of
justice.
That's why we cover life
issues and culture next to social
justice and spiritual growth — to look at the things relevant to our lives and world, and give voice to what God is
doing in and through our generation.
QUESTION:
Does anyone know if or how often SC
Justices are tested for dementia (among other
issues) and if there are mechanisms for removal other than voluntarily stepping down?
Issues of
justice arise when there is a contract or a mutual agreement between two people by which one
does something for the other and the other agrees to give something equivalent in return; this equivalence is what is termed the quid pro quo.
Similarly, although many schools
do excellent work promoting knowledge and understanding of racism and poverty, it is much rarer to find even Catholic schools having Pro-life Awareness Weeks as a standard annual whole - school activity in which pupils are encouraged to understand the
justice and coherence of Church teaching on abortion and related
issues.
At the heart of the
issue was the fact that exclusivism just didn't feel right to me, it didn't fit with my very core sense of right and wrong, of
justice and injustice, of good and evil.
Like all typologies, it will not
do justice to all the factors, but its use will be defensible, I trust, if it makes a few of the main
issues more clear.
the
issue i have with creationism is that it
does not
do justice to the vast and beautiful intricacies of the universe.
There is so much thinking and research that needs to be
done on this topic, and I am in no way
doing the
issue any
justice through such quickly - written blog posts.
The result is that America is a nation deeply divided between people who are concerned about real - life
issues — war and peace, social
justice, the health and welfare of people — on one hand, and other people who are concerned, instead, about «values,» by which they mean adherence to ancient taboos, dependence on a magical God, enforcing acceptance of ancient creeds, requiring everyone to believe as they
do, and finding safety in raw (though often hidden) social and economic power.
They don't
do so with all
issues of social
justice.
The New Deal
did not, in their estimate, constitute the hardest step in bringing about a socialized economic system; the idealistic weekly was sidestepping the crucial
issues of class conflict and the factor of coercion in effecting social
justice.
Here's to hoping you return to the logic that you claim to uphold so that regardless of which side of the
issue you fall you will still
do your argument
justice.
Does the lack of explicitness in the Apostle's Creed leave open the possibility that a pastor or church could ignore the pressing
issues of social
justice, kingdom living, and earth - care, among many others?
A second
issue has to
do with
justice — in this case,
justice for the emerging new nations of the Third World.
There is no way I can
do justice to this
issue here, but this is my short take: as it was in the ministry of the incarnate Son of God, healing serves as a sign of the wholeness yet to come when «the knowledge of the glory of the Lord covers the earth as the waters cover the sea.»
Churches recognize that
issues of
justice in local and national development can not be addressed without a consciousness of the role of communication, nor can any group
do so without the tools with which to make their views known.
Under the test, first proposed by Supreme Court
Justice Sandra O'Connor in a 1984 case from Pawtucket, Rhode Island, a display violates the Establishment Clause if it amounts to an official endorsement of religion, that is, if it suggests that the government approves a particular religious message (or disapproves such a message, though that
issue does not regularly arise).
But here a basic
issue is joined, and I conclude with Hartshorne's further explanation: «I think the truest way to
do justice to the inaccessibility of the past, which nevertheless we somehow know, is to say that we indistinctly intuit the past itself.»
CSW's Chief Executive, Mervyn Thomas, said: «CSW is urging the US government to raise the
issue of widespread hate campaigns by state and non-state actors against religious minorities in talks with Prime Minister Modi, and to insist that
justice is
done for the victim - survivors of violence against religious minorities.»
In
doing so, certainly as right - relationships,
justice, and a passion for Jesus and his ways grow
issues of injustice will be addressed.
We don't ponder deeply about significant
issues like
justice, love and character.
When gospel - related themes about
justice, peace, and equality are raised in the various elements of culture, the church may suspect that these
issues did not rise solely out of the hearts and minds of unregenerate people, but were created by the gentle breezes of the Spirit upon all people in our society.
«Not only
does ISL have the right to frame its own rules for the league and deal with related
issues, including disciplinary
issues, but in fact the AIFF has required ISL to regulate and sanction disciplinary
issues,» said former Bombay High Court Chief
Justice Kshitij Vyas, in a 21 - page order, according to The Times of India.
My interest in this whole
issue comes from the fact that if our law courts especially the highest court in Ghana, Supreme Court that is supposed to be final place in the country to deliver
justice to all manner of persons regardless of one's political affiliation, religious beliefs, ethnic background etc in a just and fair manner is now seen to be turning into a place where citizens of Ghana who may belong to certain political affiliations
do not feel confident or have trust in their handling of critical national
issues in view of some of these «partisan» pronouncements on the part of some
justices, then where would we be heading towards as a country?
Labour MP Toby Perkins later told the
justice secretary he would raise the
issue as a point of order if he
did not correct the record.
Since the Supreme Court has now prevented itself from acknowledging the question of whether Barack H. Obama is or is not an Article II «natural born citizen» based on the Kenyan / British citizenship of Barack Obama's father at the time of his birth (irrespective of whether Barack Obama is deemed a «citizen» born in Hawaii or otherwise) as a prerequisite to qualifying to serve as President of the United States under the Constitution — the Court having
done so at least three times and counting, first before the Nov 4 general election and twice before the Dec 15 vote of the College of Electors — it would seem appropriate, if not necessary, for all Executive Branch departments and agencies to secure advance formal advice from the United States Department of
Justice Office of Legal Counsel as to how to respond to expected inquiries from federal employees who are pledged to «support and defend the Constitution of the United States» as to whether they are governed by laws, regulations, orders and directives
issued under Mr. Obama during such periods that said employees, by the weight of existing legal authority and prior to a decision by the Supreme Court, believe in good faith that Mr. Obama is not an Article II «natural born citizen».
The circumspect wording of the Progress Report
issued on 10 November 2015
does scant
justice to the gravity of the political and economic situation in the country.
«The speaker laid out a comprehensive agenda this week on
issues like education, reproductive rights and criminal
justice reform, so we have a lot of work to
do here in Albany and that is what we will be focusing on,» said Michael Whyland, spokesman for Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie, D - Bronx.
Speaking to about 1,000 people Nixon cast her support as primarily driven by racial disparity in marijuana arrests, declaring that «I want to
do it first and foremost because it's a racial
justice issue.»
The labor - backed party also would like to see Cuomo
do more on criminal
justice reform and to address climate change, though Lipton allowed he has made «significant strides» on those
issues.
Selous doesn't seem to have any background on
justice or prison
issues.
But this also part of a great picture of what our criminal
justice system is
doing, and it's not just a New York City
issue.»
«This
issue is so important to me, that if we don't have a top - down review of the criminal
justice system, I honestly believe my speakership would be in vain, if we don't
do this.»
«We're going to be out there campaigning on economic
justice issues and we will take the fight to the Tories because there is a choice to be made:
do we want to live in a society based on individualism and private provision, or
do we want to defend the principles of the national health service and properly fund social care?»
«As I started to pay more attention to the social
justice issues, the human rights
issues, the good - government
issues, I thought something needs to be
done here,» Moss said.
The raise the age
issue was a key policy concern for Heastie to have accomplished in the state budget, and Cuomo last week indicated he was satisfied with the passage of a budget extender bill that funded the government until May 31, but
did not include the juvenile
justice reform.
Glyn Fullelove added: «Nevertheless, this is a thoughtful paper that clearly reflects the responses to the earlier round of consultation from the CIOT and others and
does justice to the practical
issues raised.
Democratic lawmakers in that chamber already have a number of
issues they have to get
done: rent control, monitoring the regulations for the new teacher evaluation law and an extension of mayoral control for New York City schools and criminal
justice reform, just to name a few.