AB 4395 (Constitutional Amendment) Authorizes retired supreme court justices (in New York, the court of general jurisdiction is the supreme court) to serve as
justice of supreme court until age 80.
Not exact matches
The
Supreme Court allowed parts
of Trump's ban to go into effect
until it ultimately decides the case in October, but the
justices said the ban does not apply to non-citizens who have formal relationships with people or entities in the U.S..
Supreme Court Justice Rene Le Miere appointed Ian Charles Francis to oversee YAC
until an April 19 General Meeting in which YAC members will vote to elect a new board
of directors.
While the points made by these gentlemen are both valid and critically important, they fail to take note
of four other dangerous subsidies: (1) the market perception that the Washington and Wall Street revolving door has rendered these firms immune from prosecution — even for repeated, illegal cartel behavior; (2) the ability to spend billions buying back their own stock, effectively propping up their own share price and bad behavior; (3) self - regulation with compromised bodies creating the market perception and reality
of a competitive edge; and (4) Congress and the
Supreme Court tolerating Wall Street running its own private
justice system (mandatory arbitration) where corrupt acts are kept hidden from public view
until they blow up into catastrophic events to the economy.
She served as a County
Court Judge
until 2002, when she was elected a
Justice of the New York State
Supreme Court.
The US
Supreme Court has no retirement age,
justices are appointed for life — or
until they decide to take themselves out
of the game, whichever comes first.
A state
Supreme Court justice found late yesterday that Republican primary challenger Philip Pidot has enough signatures to qualify for a GOP congressional primary against Sen. Jack Martins, but will not issue a formal decision
until today on the ultimate fate
of a primary, which would either be held Tuesday or a at later date.
While the principle
of «innocent
until proven guilty,» also known as the «presumption
of innocence,» isn't explicitly mentioned in the United States Constitution (though it is part
of the 1789 Declaration
of the Rights
of Man and
of the Citizen, a key document
of the French Revolution), it is long considered one the most fundamental principles
of the American
justice system.In 1895, the U.S.
Supreme Court declared in Coffin v. United States that «the principle that there is a presumption
of innocence in favor
of the accused is the undoubted law, axiomatic and elementary, and its enforcement lies at the foundation
of the administration
of our criminal law.»
Cuomo's prosecutors submitted the terms
of the agreement earlier this month to Manhattan state
Supreme Court Justice Lewis Bart Stone, who initially wanted to release the details, but was convinced by the AG's office to keep them under wraps
until they were finalized.
Cities, counties and towns throughout the US have defined «pit bull» as «a pit bull terrier, a Staffordshire bull terrier, an American Staffordshire terrier, an American pit bull terrier, any dog mixed with any
of these three breeds, or a dog that has an appearance and physical characteristics that are substantially similar to (these) dogs...»
Until YOU are appointed to the US
Supreme Court and succeed in getting the other eight
justices to hear a «pit bull» case and overturn this definition, it stands!
So up
until now, powerhouse law firm Paul Weiss should consider itself fortunate that its decision back in 1959 to reject
Supreme Court justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg predated the advent
of the Internet.
There was a lot
of pride when he was appointed to the
Supreme Court and all the much more so now that he's appointed chief
justice,» says Louis Charette, a partner at Lavery lawyers who worked with Wagner on construction and professional liability litigation files in the litigation team at the firm
until Wagner was appointed to the bench in 2004.
In September 1790, Robert Yates was chosen to be the Chief
Justice of the New York State
Supreme Court and continued serving
until the mandatory retirement age
of sixty.
However, if a
justice of the
supreme court dies within one year before the term
of the governor expires, that
justice may not be replaced
until the governor whose term commences after expiration
of the term
of the governor in office when the
justice died appoints a successor
justice.
In December 1985, she was elevated to the
Court of Appeal for British Columbia where she served
until her appointment as Chief
Justice of the
Supreme Court of British Columbia in September 1988.
Until his retirement,
Justice Stevens was the last link to a tradition
of opinion writing that stretched back to the very creation
of the
Supreme Court.
Reappointment was effectively automatic
until Governor Christie ended the practice by declining to reappoint several members
of the state's
Supreme Court and potentially Chief
Justice Rabner.
Therefore, according to the ECJ, the national
supreme court «might decide to refrain from making a reference to the Court and resolve the question raised before it on its own» and it is not required «to wait until the Court of Justice has given an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling by the lower court» (paragraph
court «might decide to refrain from making a reference to the
Court and resolve the question raised before it on its own» and it is not required «to wait until the Court of Justice has given an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling by the lower court» (paragraph
Court and resolve the question raised before it on its own» and it is not required «to wait
until the
Court of Justice has given an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling by the lower court» (paragraph
Court of Justice has given an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling by the lower
court» (paragraph
court» (paragraph 61).
The chancellor and
justices of the
supreme court shall hold their offices during good behavior, or
until they shall attain the age
of sixty years.
In reaching her decision as to how to deal with the quagmire
of fairness, i.e. either the defendant is ordered to pay the full amount
of the judgment now and risks overpaying or the plaintiff is forced to wait — without any income —
until the expiration
of what he says is the reasonable notice period,
Justice Pollak turned to the decision
of the
Supreme Court of Canada in Hryniak v. Mauldin, 2014 SCC 7, and noted the following:
Since she will not face the voters
until 2012, the miscarriage
of justice perpetrated by Chief Justice Keller can only be remedied by a recommendation by the Judicial Conduct Commission to the Texas Supreme Court that she be removed from
justice perpetrated by Chief
Justice Keller can only be remedied by a recommendation by the Judicial Conduct Commission to the Texas Supreme Court that she be removed from
Justice Keller can only be remedied by a recommendation by the Judicial Conduct Commission to the Texas
Supreme Court that she be removed from office.
This is positive for premises owner defendants in take - home asbestos cases in the sense that
Justice Aldrich did not create a
Court of Appeals split on the issue
of the duty owed by premises owners to take - home plaintiffs, but as the Beckering
Court noted, the issue will not be resolved with any certainty
until the California
Supreme Court makes its decision.
In September 1993,
Justice Pariente was appointed to the Fourth District
Court of Appeal, where she served
until her appointment as the seventy - seventh
Justice of the Florida
Supreme Court on December 10, 1997.