Former cabinet minister Chris Huhne has pleaded guilty to perverting the course of
justice over claims his ex-wife Vicky Pryce took speeding points for him a decade ago.
Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg says he is «shocked and saddened» after the former cabinet minister Chris Huhne admitted perverting the course of
justice over claims his ex-wife took speeding points for him a decade ago.
Not exact matches
He has attacked former FBI Director James Comey for releasing memos he
claims are classified, and briefly blocked a Democratic memo from the House Intelligence Committee
over its inclusion of classified information, yet he grandstands against redactions insisted upon by his own
Justice Department.)
At the risk of oversimplification, the interlocutors argue for God's temporal as well as eternal
justice, while Job expresses perplexity
over their
claim for his temporal
justice.
Wouldn't it constitute a decisive triumph of the moral imperatives of social
justice over the allegedly specious
claims that meritocratic practices can identify and reward the talented and deserving?
When in a parable the problem of the impartial administration of
justice arises, the particular takes precedence
over the universal, and the
claims of
justice are overruled by the grace of charity.
During the launch Blair
claimed that the priority of the exercise was democratic consultation
over «social
justice» and that «big issues need real debate, a big conversation between politicians and the people».
The court, presided
over by
Justice Samuel Obeng Diawuo on July 19, 2016, further ordered and barred all those
claiming ownership of the property through Endurance Oti Boateng from doing so.
Ministry of
Justice hands
over notes to couple who disagreed with judge's decision to reject constructive dismissal
claim
The High Court, presided
over by
Justice Nicholas M.C. Abodakpi, on May 2, 2018, dismissed the
claim by plaintiff whereas all those
claiming through him were forbidden from doing so.
Ministry of
Justice hands
over notes to couple who disagreed with his 2013 decision to reject constructive dismissal
claim
The magistrates
claim they are facing a 3.5 per cent annual cut in real terms funding in the coming years, but Lord Falconer insisted that
over the last decade, investment in the criminal
justice system had gone up from two per cent of GDP to 2.5 per cent.
With questions still swirling
over President Donald Trump's unsubstantiated
claims that he was wiretapped on orders of President Barack Obama, the
Justice Department declined to confirm statements a day earlier from the White House that Trump was not the target of a counterintelligence investigation.
The EFCC accused
Justice Nganjiwa of receiving
over $ 260,000 through his bank account between 2013 and 2015,
claiming that the judge could not explain the source of the funds.
Chris Grayling, the
justice secretary, who is also the lord chancellor, has been the most vociferous cabinet minister on the issue,
claiming that the Strasbourg court was being allowed to take precedence
over homegrown law.
«Extremism in prisons is a real issue but it is also an area that both the Home Office and the
Justice Department could
claim to have ownership
over.
An Exxon Mobil Corp unit has agreed to pay $ 1.4 million to resolve U.S. government
claims over a 2012 crude oil spill in Louisiana, the U.S.
Justice Department said on Tuesday.
The Department of
Justice is suing Louisiana
over its voucher program,
claiming it slows the desegregation process.
The latest suit also marks the second time in a year that Jindal has locked horns with the federal government
over education: He and the
Justice Department
claimed partial victories in a dispute
over a private school voucher program that the feds said affected desegregation efforts in Louisiana public schools.
Using Citizens for Tax
Justice as their source, NEA
claims that closing the seven largest corporate tax loopholes would provide an estimated $ 1.487 trillion in additional revenues
over the next ten years.
Over the years, the case escalated from LTB hearing, to small
claims court, to a criminal matter before the Ontario Superior Court of
Justice.
Whether in the realm of social
justice, community building, spirituality or environmental concerns, the
claim of art as a pure domain of disinterested aesthetic contemplation has been relentlessly challenged for
over two centuries.
> Les descendants de Peggy Guggenheim perdent en
justice lefigaro > Peggy Guggenheim's descendants have failed to stop the Guggenheim Foundation from displaying whatever art it wishes to at their ancestor's Italian estate jewishbusinessnews > Paris Court Rejects Guggenheim Descendants»
Claim Over Venice Palazzo nyt > The court rejects the claimants» suit in its entirety guggenheim
Tim Nicholson entitled to protection for his beliefs, and his
claim over dismissal will now be heard by a tribunal..................... In his written judgment, Mr
Justice Burton outlined five tests to determine whether a philosophical belief could come under employment regulations on religious discrimination http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/nov/03/tim-nicholson-climate-change-belief
The four month trial, which involved complex evidence from approximately 20 factual and 16 expert witnesses from the US, Switzerland and various jurisdictions in Asia, concluded with Mr
Justice Cooke not only dismissing the entirety of SHI's $ 8 billion
claim, but also ordering that SHI pay DB
over $ 240 million and costs on an indemnity basis.
With
over 40 years of experience in handling automobile product defect cases, the lawyers at Kreisman Law Offices have the know - how and resources to aggressively handle your
claim and obtain
justice for you and your family.
In Vanderveen v. Waterbridge Media Inc., Basia Vanderveen took the media company to the Ontario Superior Court of
Justice Small
Claims Court
over her two - second appearance in a two - minute sales video for a condo building in Ottawa.
The
claim was dismissed last autumn, with Lord
Justice Christopher Clarke awarding the defendants costs on an indemnity basis in October, making four groups of third - party funders collectively liable for
over # 23m.
As stated by
Justice Robert Sharpe in the Court of Appeal for Ontario's 2002 decision, Gajraj v. DeBernardo,» [j] urisdiction
over claims against extra-provincial defendants should not be bootstrapped by such a secondary and contingent
claim against a provincial defendant.»
Over his career, he has seen many individuals and businesses with significant
claims unable to obtain access to the civil
justice system or properly pursue their
claims due to the inability to pay the attorneys» fees required by the traditional hourly fee model.
[181] RBS
claimed privilege
over six documents that it had shown to various regulators and the United States Department of
Justice and the Attorneys - General of several US states.
In November 2017, a UK based window salesman gained support from the European Court of
Justice for a
claim made against his former employer
over a holiday pay dispute.
(2) The motion judge erred in holding that the Superior Court of
Justice has no jurisdiction
over Father Hart's
claim; and
The Canadian Judicial Council has announced an inquiry committee will be held under the Judges Act about
Justice Frank Newbould of the Ontario Superior Court of
Justice over complaints that he made comments and wrote letters on an ongoing land
claim issue in Sauble Beach where his family has owned a cottage for 100 years.
I have
over 22 years of experience in personal injury
claims, and if there is any difficulty in getting satisfaction from the responsible party's insurance company, I am very qualified to take the case to civil court to pursue
justice.
The International Court of
Justice has rejected jurisdiction
over the
claim brought by the Marshall Islands against the United Kingdom, alleging breach of the obligation (under Article VI of the Non-Proliferation Treaty) to negotiate in good faith for nuclear disarmament.
You've already been the victim of property damage, but the
claims resolution process could make you feel like a victim all
over again as you wait for
justice and fair treatment — sometimes in vain.
After well
over nine months, enough has been said and written about the Jackson reforms but little if any attention has been given to what now seems to be a clear picture of the driving force behind these changes: civil
justice for personal injury claimants is to be rationed, based upon the simple value of the
claim rather than its substantive merits.
If one assumes that «access to
justice» and «
justice» are public goods that the state takes
over as soon as it detects a legal dispute (e.g., on filing a Notice of Civil
Claim), then one's perspective changes.
Am I right that in your opinion the fact that every judge of the Superior Court of
Justice is also a judge of the Small
Claims Court effectively counters arguments about the Small
Claims Court being a court presided
over by judges appointed by the provincial government, and thus potentially affected by this lawsuit?
To further bolster his decision to stay the action,
Justice Perell fully considered the issue of forum non conveniens — which is the question of whether, even if Ontario courts have jurisdiction
over a
claim, jurisdiction should still be declined because there is another forum that would clearly be a better place to determine the dispute.
The brief supported the plaintiffs in the case, members of Jara's family, explaining that a U.S. court's decision to accept jurisdiction
over plaintiffs»
claims would be consistent with the Republic of Chile's goals of
justice and accountability for human rights abuses committed during the Pinochet regime.
For
over three decades, our attorneys have helped victims file
claims in court seeking
justice and financial compensation for injuries, negligence, unpaid wages, asbestos exposure, serious illnesses, drug side effects, and wrongful death.
(5) The completion of any portion of a term during which a person serving as Small
Claims Court Administrative Judge is
over 64 years of age and under 75 years of age is subject to the annual approval of the Chief
Justice of the Superior Court of
Justice.
Over the past several years this has proven to be a very successful approach to all litigation matters, whether before Small
Claims Court, the Superior Court of
Justice, the Ontario Court of Appeal or the Supreme Court of Canada.
Her case was heard by the Honourable
Justice Stinson, who found in favour of the unnamed woman, creating a new tort of «public disclosure of embarrassing private facts» and awarding
over $ 100,000 in damages and costs (the plaintiff brought her action under the Simplified Procedure which limits a
claim of damages to $ 100,000).
With
over 40 years of experience in handling heart attack errors cases, the Chicago medical malpractice lawyers at Kreisman Law Offices have the know - how and resources to aggressively handle your medical negligence
claim and obtain
justice for you and your family.
With
over 40 years of experience in handling surgical errors cases, the Chicago medical malpractice lawyers at Kreisman Law Offices have the know - how and resources to aggressively handle your medical negligence
claim and obtain
justice for you and your family.
Justice Skarica considered the factors outlined in Club Resorts Ltd. v. Van Breda for the court to take jurisdiction
over a
claim.
The suit argues that the exclusion of benefits for chronic mental stress violates the Charter of Rights, seeks to have the legislation preventing entitlement to compensation declared immediately invalid, and calls for retroactive
justice with reconsideration of
claims rejected
over the past 20 years (since the ban was introduced with passage of Bill 99).