Such negotiations should include the appropriateness of extending the application of restorative
justice principles in criminal justice issues for Aboriginal offenders with a view to improving outcomes for them within the criminal justice system.
However, a Saskatchewan judge responded that while the reports are not often prepared, the relevant details are made available, and judges do often apply restorative
justice principles in cases of Indigenous offenders.
Fostering Excellence through Social
Justice Principles in Schools Serving English Learners, by Nilka Avilés, Ed.D., IDRA Newsletter, November - December 2016
Not exact matches
The
Justice Department reached an agreement
in principle with Bayer and...
When employers terminate an employee as punishment for wrongdoing, it's important that they proceed
in a way that pays attention to fundamental
principles of
justice.
In any event, the point isn't whether the requirement to complete the long - form census form violates the charter, I don't think it does because it's probably either a violation «in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice» (under section 7) or a violation which is «reasonable and demonstrably justifiable in a free and democratic society» (the test under section 1), but that it does nevertheless violate the right to privacy which is one of our fundamental right
In any event, the point isn't whether the requirement to complete the long - form census form violates the charter, I don't think it does because it's probably either a violation «
in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice» (under section 7) or a violation which is «reasonable and demonstrably justifiable in a free and democratic society» (the test under section 1), but that it does nevertheless violate the right to privacy which is one of our fundamental right
in accordance with the
principles of fundamental
justice» (under section 7) or a violation which is «reasonable and demonstrably justifiable
in a free and democratic society» (the test under section 1), but that it does nevertheless violate the right to privacy which is one of our fundamental right
in a free and democratic society» (the test under section 1), but that it does nevertheless violate the right to privacy which is one of our fundamental rights.
Justice Kennedy's majority opinion said that there was no
principled way to distinguish between media corporations and other corporations and that the dissent's theory would allow Congress to suppress political speech
in newspapers, on television news programs,
in books and on blogs.
Interestingly, the biggest move here wasn't from customers themselves but from the European Union Court of
Justice, which upheld the Right to be Forgotten
principle in a May ruling against Google.
The organizations sent a joint letter to Minister of Foreign Affairs Chrystia Freeland outlining their shared
principles and priorities for a new trade model rooted
in principles of equity, the primacy of human rights — including the rights of Indigenous peoples, women and girls, workers, migrants, farmers, and communities — and social and ecological
justice.
A polemicist might well have salty things to say about this abdication of moral
principles that Christians have held since the earliest days of the faith, but
in Wilcox's mild and irenic diction the mainline churches are simply «accommodationist,» espousing what he calls a «Golden Rule Christianity» that honors tolerance, kindness, and social
justice as paramount virtues.
Only with regard to the Oliners» third type, the
principled orientation, do we get attention to the level of reflectivity and autonomy exercised by persons choosing rescue activity as an expression of their duty
in relation to the demands of equity and
justice, or their duty
in relation to the imperative to care.
The Oliners found,
in this group, persons who relied both upon
principles of
justice and equity, on the one hand, and upon
principles of care, on the other.
In refusing to impose the details of justice from afar the liberal political cultures would not be abandoning principles, for «self - determination» in the political sense is not just a principle of modern democrac
In refusing to impose the details of
justice from afar the liberal political cultures would not be abandoning
principles, for «self - determination»
in the political sense is not just a principle of modern democrac
in the political sense is not just a
principle of modern democracy.
Perhaps most disconcerting, however, is that Wehner and Brooks offer no
principles of
justice on how individuals should deploy their wealth, and in a book titled Wealth and Justice this is disappo
justice on how individuals should deploy their wealth, and
in a book titled Wealth and
Justice this is disappo
Justice this is disappointing.
I hope we can all agree
in principle that discrimination, marginalisation, oppression
in practice, attitudes or any form is not OK and requiring of equal attention and
justice wherever it comes from.
The same
principle of
justice that condemns interest
in a no - growth economy demands reasonable interest
in a growth economy.
The application of these
principles in the United States would be relatively easy if the criminal
justice system operated such that those guilty of capital crimes remained behind bars for life.
Drawing on the biblical motifs of community and solidarity, the document formulates several
principles of economic
justice and then advocates community interests above private interests, and calls for public ownership and worker management
in corporations.
In particular, the declaration references the charter's «principles of constitutional contractual citizenship» and «freedom of movement, property ownership, mutual solidarity and defense, as well as principles of justice and equality before the law,» in regards to Muslims and non-Muslim
In particular, the declaration references the charter's «
principles of constitutional contractual citizenship» and «freedom of movement, property ownership, mutual solidarity and defense, as well as
principles of
justice and equality before the law,»
in regards to Muslims and non-Muslim
in regards to Muslims and non-Muslims.
If, however, it is proposed not as a preference but as a
principle, it gravely distorts moral deliberation about the use of force
in the service of
justice.
It is an attempt to identify
in modes of discourse accessible to the public those first
principles of truth and
justice that are sufficiently clear as to be adopted as bases for public policy and the ordering of international life.
Let him refrain from appealing to great
principles — a Declaration of Rights, democracy,
justice —
in the hope of escaping the reaction of the power he has attacked.
This country was built on the ideas of freedom and
justice and we should never abandon our
principles in the name of fear or hate.
And secondly,
in principle, the themes of
justice and mission
in marriage apply equally to both husband and wife.
Such a right is - to use the words of the Court - neither «implicit
in the concept of ordered liberty,» nor is it «a
principle of
justice so rooted
in the traditions and conscience of our people as to be ranked fundamental.»
In my judgment, the «Social Principles» of the United Methodists, the «Statement on Economic Justice» of the Lutheran Church in America, the «Statement on Human Rights» of the United Church of Christ, and the World Council of Churches» themes of «Justice, Sustainability and Participation» are models of such effort
In my judgment, the «Social
Principles» of the United Methodists, the «Statement on Economic
Justice» of the Lutheran Church
in America, the «Statement on Human Rights» of the United Church of Christ, and the World Council of Churches» themes of «Justice, Sustainability and Participation» are models of such effort
in America, the «Statement on Human Rights» of the United Church of Christ, and the World Council of Churches» themes of «
Justice, Sustainability and Participation» are models of such efforts.
In fact it could with justice be said that the principles are all the more important as ultimate orientation and guides, the more complicated, obscure and inaccessible to total conscious analysis the reality becomes which man himself creates and in which he must morally subsis
In fact it could with
justice be said that the
principles are all the more important as ultimate orientation and guides, the more complicated, obscure and inaccessible to total conscious analysis the reality becomes which man himself creates and
in which he must morally subsis
in which he must morally subsist.
By showing Abraham their common ground about the
principles of
justice, God enables Abraham to gain His perspective on the practice of
justice in the political realm.
In other words, a valid theory of justice requires an internal distinction between the formative principle or set of principles that should be explicitly articulated in a democratic constitution and the substantive principle or set of principles that ought to determine decisions taken in or through the full and free political discours
In other words, a valid theory of
justice requires an internal distinction between the formative
principle or set of
principles that should be explicitly articulated
in a democratic constitution and the substantive principle or set of principles that ought to determine decisions taken in or through the full and free political discours
in a democratic constitution and the substantive
principle or set of
principles that ought to determine decisions taken
in or through the full and free political discours
in or through the full and free political discourse.
As McBrien noted, this powerfully suggests the need to be attentive to
justice issues within as well as outside the church This principle of sacramentality undergirds the statement in the U.S. Catholic bishops» pastoral letter Economic Justice for All: «All the moral principles that govern the just operation of any economic endeavor apply to the church and its agencies and institutions; indeed the church should be exemplary» (no
justice issues within as well as outside the church This
principle of sacramentality undergirds the statement
in the U.S. Catholic bishops» pastoral letter Economic
Justice for All: «All the moral principles that govern the just operation of any economic endeavor apply to the church and its agencies and institutions; indeed the church should be exemplary» (no
Justice for All: «All the moral
principles that govern the just operation of any economic endeavor apply to the church and its agencies and institutions; indeed the church should be exemplary» (no. 347).
It may be worth emphasizing that the substantive
principle of
justice in a teleological ethic (or, for that matter, any ethic at all) is invalid unless it consistently implies the formative human rights of communicative respect.
For
justice is done
in the particular case, and until tried
in the courts, abstract
principles have no more authority than the people who declare them.
Instead, I will assume that the case for neoclassical metaphysics can otherwise be made and attempt programmatically to show that the comprehensive purpose it formulates grounds
justice as compound, grounds a substantive
principle of
justice that consistently implies the formative human rights of communicative respect.7 Toward the conclusion of this argument, I will also seek to identify an inclusive human right that is substantive
in character.
While the Church has insisted that the
justice administered by the state should be rooted
in Christian
principle, historically the Church had not ceded the oversight of morality as such to the state.
Furthermore,
in the continuing tension between levels and branches of political authority, the distrust of unrestricted autonomy is expressed, and the need for common loyalty based on objective
principles of
justice is made plain.
It is
in the epistles of Paul, therefore, that full
justice is done for the first time to the
principle of» realized eschatology» which is vital to the whole kerygma.
Special care should be taken to discourage young people, who
in their search for personal identity tend to be conformists, from interpreting and practicing democracy as majority rule,
in disregard of individual and minority rights and careless of the proper subordination of the will of the group to the
principles of
justice.
Both parties are
in principle dedicated to the same goals — namely,
justice in the nation and the welfare of all the people — but they have somewhat different convictions about what
justice and welfare concretely mean and about how these benefits may best be secured.
When
in the first instance the decisions made behind the «veil of ignorance» have not resulted
in exactly the
principles of
justice he wants, he changes the conditions behind the veil.
Implicit
in references to deserving are the dual assumptions that to speak thus is to speak with the vocabulary of retributive
justice, and that the
principle of retribution, however much qualified by other relevant
principles, is inherent
in any notion of penalty or punishment.
One of its
principle problems has been that of making sense of the whole
in a way that does
justice to the particular character of its parts.
In other words, a law's inconsistency with the
principles of
justice on which the society rests can be proof of its invalidity.
He says that a particular moral theory called «principlism,» which emerged
in the mid-1970s — embracing the
principles of autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence and
justice — came to characterize the field «according to the profession's own self - declaration.»
Justice is the mediating
principle between absolute love and the power
principles of society — the relative embodiment of love
in social structures.
Equality is a significant
principle of
justice deduced, from the law of love and implicit within the love command: «Thus equality is love
in terms of logic.
Reinhold Niebuhr is less dualistic
in that he stresses the relevance of love as an «impossible possibility» to every human situation, but he warns so continually against a sentimental substitution of love for the requirements of
justice that the major impact of his thought is a dichotomy
in which again
justice, and not love, is the determining
principle of social ethics.
Systems and
principles of
justice are the servants and instruments of the spirit of brotherhood
in so far as they extend the sense of obligation towards the other, (a) from an immediately felt obligation, prompted by obvious need, to a continued obligation expressed
in fixed
principles of mutual support; (b) from a simple relation of the self and one «other» to the complex relations of the self and the «others»; and (c) finally from the obligations... which the community defines from its more impartial perspective.5
That it was, however, the
principle of
justice, not only
in the Catholic law of nature, but also for the Reformers, is proved by hundreds of texts
in Luther, Zwingli and Calvin.»
It would be approximately accurate to claim that their
principles of social
justice had been known and legislated
in the Orient for more than a thousand years before Amos.
A country that was founded on the
principles of liberty and
justice for all will remember how
justice was too long denied to African - Americans, how the civil rights movement made clear that separate is not equal, and how King's dream of all people living together
in peace was «deeply rooted
in the American dream.»