Not exact matches
President Donald Trump has nominated a former corporate lawyer —
who previously said that AT&T's bid for Time Warner doesn't pose a «major antitrust
problem» — as the U.S.
Justice Department's next competition chief.
In a 1994 Angus Reid poll, for example, one - in - five Canadians
who thought crime was on the rise in their communities (19 %) said — unprompted — that
justice system leniency was part of the
problem.
Allan Flynn,
who runs the «Comex, We Have a
Problem» blog, this week posted a fascinating review of the traders
who are the major targets of the recent investigation by the U.S.
Justice Department and Commodity Futures Trading Commission of «spoofing» in the monetary metals futures markets.
The conference invited leaders in the Buddhist movement for social
justice in Southeast Asia
who are now dealing with
problems that have long since surfaced elsewhere.
So the natural philosopher
who aims for comprehensive explanations that do
justice both to science and to ordinary experience is obliged to wrestle with the
problem of the «goodness,» or otherwise, of predominant mythologies, especially those that underpin the scientistic ideology.
In 1978 he wrote about Christ Without Myth: «The newer theological developments of the past decade, especially the emergence of the various theologians of liberation, compelled the conclusion that the most urgent theological
problem today, at any rate for the vast number of persons
who still do not share in the benefits of modernity, is a
problem more of action and
justice than of belief and truth.
One process thinker, virtually alone,
who does deal extensively with the
problems of equality and
justice, is Kenneth Cauthen.
«They're a
problem for all Americans
who care about
justice.»
«This sums up the skewed priorities of a
justice secretary
who has no solutions to the
problems in our prisons,» he said.
Clinton said other necessary reforms include proper treatment for the mentally ill and drug addicted
who make up an increasingly larger percentage of the prison population, sentencing reform so people with low level offenses do not face long prison terms, and tackling income inequality, which is often at the root of the
problem for many people caught in the criminal
justice system.
Clegg,
who is a committed europhile, warned that pulling out of EU
justice measures would hit anti-terrorism and crime efforts, despite expectations that Cameron will highlight
problems with the European arrest warrant.
«And that's not just New York, it's a
problem all across the country and it's a
problem in reality and it's a
problem in perception and if it's a
problem only in perception, it is still a real
problem because people have to trust the
justice system and the trust has to go both ways,» Cuomo said, speaking about police and community, but also referring to the oft - cited conflict of interest around police and prosecutors
who regularly work together but can then be at odds when an officer is suspected of a crime.
The
problem is that the criminal
justice system has been too soft on prisoners
who just come out of jail and reoffend.
«If we could design a small molecule inhibitor that would look like heme - iron but would actually clog up a key metabolic pathway in bacteria, we may be able to get around the
problem of antibiotic resistance,» suggests Dr. Mason,
who adds that he and Dr.
Justice plan to use the new five - year NIH grant to further studies of just such an inhibitor.
Bermudez,
who speaks in America and abroad about the power of persistence and the need for
justice reform, calls his story «a cautionary tale against this happening to others as a public safety
problem that allows true perpetrators to escape punishment while families are ripped apart.»
Milton
Justice,
who won an Oscar for Best Documentary Short in 1987, called the changes «insulting to black people,» saying Selma's only
problem was that not enough voters liked it.
Such schools serve very high - risk student populations, including those in the juvenile
justice system, with substance abuse
problems,
who are persistently truant, and more.
I realize that these things should be taken seriously, and anyone
who does it should be disciplined, but at the same time, at least in the first case, if the woman still has a
problem with it after 2-1/2 years to take to twitter to try and get
justice, then there are other means by which she can pursue remedy.
This is so because in addition to the theological reasons given by Pope Francis recently: (a) it is a
problem mostly caused by some nations and people emitting high - levels of greenhouse gases (ghg) in one part of the world
who are harming or threatening tens of millions of living people and countless numbers of future generations throughout the world
who include some of the world's poorest people
who have done little to cause the
problem, (b) the harms to many of the world's most vulnerable victims of climate change are potentially catastrophic, (c) many people most at risk from climate change often can't protect themselves by petitioning their governments; their best hope is that those causing the
problem will see that
justice requires them to greatly lower their ghg emissions, (d) to protect the world's most vulnerable people nations must limit their ghg emissions to levels that constitute their fair share of safe global emissions, and, (e) climate change is preventing some people from enjoying the most basic human rights including rights to life and security among others.
This is so because: (a) it is a
problem mostly caused by some nations and people emitting high - levels of greenhouse gases (ghg) in one part of the world
who are harming or threatening tens of millions of living people and countless numbers of future generations throughout the world
who include some of the world's poorest people
who have done little to cause the
problem, (b) the harms to many of the world's most vulnerable victims of climate change are potentially catastrophic, (c) many people most at risk from climate change often can't protect themselves by petitioning their governments; their best hope is that those causing the
problem will see that
justice requires them to greatly lower their ghg emissions, (d) to protect the world's most vulnerable people nations must limit their ghg emissions to levels that constitute their fair share of safe global emissions, and, (e) climate change is preventing some people from enjoying the most basic human rights including rights to life and security among others.
These features include: (a) it is a
problem caused by some nations and people emitting high - levels of ghgs in one part of the world
who are harming or threatening tens of millions of living people and countless numbers of future generations throughout the world
who include some of the world's poorest people and
who have done little to cause the
problem, (b) the harms to many of the world's most vulnerable victims of climate change are potentially catastrophic, (c) many people most at risk from climate change often can't protect themselves by petitioning their governments; their best hope is that those causing the
problem will see that
justice requires them to greatly lower their ghg emissions, and, (d) to protect the world's most vulnerable people, nations must act quickly to limit their ghg emissions to levels that constitute their fair share of safe global emissions.
Susann Scherbarth, climate
justice and energy campaigner, Friends of the Earth Europe said: «To have any hope of tackling our climate crisis, we need to see urgent and ambitious action, led by those
who caused the
problem.
We must see climate change as an ethical
problem because: (a) it is a
problem caused by some people in one part of the world that puts others and the natural resources on which they depend at great risk, (b) the harms to these other people are not mere inconveniences but in some cases catastrophic losses of life or the ability to sustain life, and (c) those
who are vulnerable to climate change cant petition their governments to act to protect themselves but must rely upon a hope that a sense of
justice and responsibility of those causing the
problem will motivate them to change their behavior.
On top of that and lot's of other
problems here, three of the Supreme Court
justices think it's A-OK not to positively identify people
who want to vote in our elections.
Questions That Should Be Asked Of Politicians And Others
Who Oppose National Action On Climate Change On The Basis Of Scientific Uncertainty Or Unacceptable Cost To The Economy Given That Climate Change Is A Profound Global
Justice And Ethical
Problem
Yet questions of distributive
justice about which nations should bear the major responsibility for most GHG reductions at the international level have and continue to block agreement in international climate negotiations, as well as questions about which countries should be financially responsible for adaptation costs and damages in poor countries that are most vulnerable to climate change's harshest climate impacts and
who have done little to cause the
problem.
As New York Times reporter Luanne White reports in this article, In New Orleans, Rust in the Wheels of
Justice (11/21/06), in the aftermath of Katrina, «as many as 500 defendants, mostly in drug, theft and assault cases, have been freed because of
problems with evidence, including difficulty in finding the witnesses
who have moved away.»
In support of its position, the guide notes six of the seven California
justices who adopted the all - citations - in - footnotes style several years ago «have now abandoned it because of the «bobblehead doll» syndrome and quotability
problems noted above.»
The fact that the majority of Canadians can not afford to seek
justice through the current system is a
problem which far outstrips in magnitude concerns about maximizing procedural and due process protections for those litigants
who are presently able to access the system.
That said, outside of certain pernicious civil
problems that plague many individuals
who fall into the access to
justice gap — domestic violence, evictions, debt collections, foreclosures — even lawyers likely generally assume that the remainder of the civil system runs relatively smoothly, with both sides of a dispute having access to an attorney.
«One of the reasons I started this campaign was because I kept getting calls from litigants looking for services at a lower price, so I'm excited that we're finally going to get access to
justice for people with family law
problems who can't afford a lawyer,» says Yarmus,
who runs Toronto - based Civil Litigations Paralegal Services.
«For Muslim women
who already experience racism and other forms of discrimination, a signal from the court that the Canadian
justice system is an unwelcome place to them will further exacerbate that
problem.»
Access to
justice is an incredibly difficult
problem not only for those
who are indigent or without resources but increasingly for those in the middle class
who can't afford legal services in order to meet their basic needs or find them difficult to access.
To solve a complex social
problem like access to
justice, we need to learn to work closely with others
who may not share our views, our experiences and maybe even the same perception of the access to
justice problem (and solution) that we do.
The chief
justice wrote a brief foreword to the book and noted that those of us
who have no
problem reading may not fully comprehend the frustration of those
who have difficulty reading when facing «the document - laden
justice system»:
The program brought together a multidisciplinary team of undergraduate students
who received a short primer on
problems in the
justice system.
Focusing on common legal
problems faced by people with low or moderate incomes, Steps to
Justice also aims to assist first - contact community workers,
who are often the trusted intermediaries for many experiencing legal
problems.
They are the lawyers
who are blazing trails towards collaborative law, restorative
justice and other alternative ways to resolve conflicts and solve
problems.
Many of the people,
who find themselves in the criminal
justice system, do in fact have an addiction
problem.
Who stands to lose nothing to this access to
justice problem of unaffordable legal services?
We talked about an access to
justice gap, but what people are usually talking about is an access to lawyers gap because there is actually no gap in the number of people
who have their legal
problems solved.
In my specialized roles as a limited retainer lawyer and as a legal research professional, I have an insight into a
problem that has long posed a challenge to the legal community: access to
justice for those
who can not afford to retain a lawyer to take full carriage of a file.
Lack of A2J Threatens Us All Reason number 5: we frankly have an embarrassing access to
justice problem and while we can continue to ignore it, we have some responsibility to our profession and to the public,
who has extended to us as lawyers special self - regulating protections.
As a lawyer
who has worked in small claims courts, my clients need for affordable access to
justice is a
problem I have struggled with.
While rooted in the very best of intentions, this standard approach to
justice reform fails to consider the opinions and suggestions of the only people
who can speak fully to the severity of the access to
justice crisis — the people
who sought to resolve their legal
problems through the
justice system and
who failed somewhere along the way.
The national Action Committee on Access to
Justice in Civil and Family Matters notes in its final report that only about 6.5 % of legal
problems ever make it to court, but it is unlikely in the extreme that so many of the people with high school diplomas or less are bundled into the 93.5 %
who manage to resolve their legal issues outside of court, especially when we know that for people with low incomes, legal issues tend not come one at a time but cluster and multiply into other areas of the law.
Let us hope that more and more past supporters will have the courage of epiphany and (1) give up trying to deliver ownership of our profession to those
who do not and can not share our ethos, and (2) work toward improving access to
justice by tackling the real
problems.
The
problem with access to
justice is a function of the existing regulatory framework, which ABS doesn't change — namely that legal services must be provided by lawyers
who, in order to become lawyers, must be highly skilled people (in order to jump through the hoops to become lawyers), and
who typically have high reservation wages (i.e., they don't need to be lawyers, they could get good jobs in other fields).
To the extent that it is correct to say (as some here have said) that access to
justice problems reside primarily in litigation — or at least are highly amplified by the one percent of lawyers
who are litigators — then offering up solutions to these
problems would go a long way to undercutting Mr. Kowalski's «we need ABS stance.»
Native Youth at Risk Courtlink A program designed to address the
justice - related issues of aboriginal youth
who are at risk and
who exhibit low self - esteem and behavioural
problems.