Not exact matches
In the Genesis narratives, for example, Abraham is depicted neither as a religious philosopher nor as a
reformer but as someone whom God «makes his own» and ordains to be the progenitor
of a family - nation that would serve as a pilot - people for humanity by keeping God's way — the avoidance
of violence and the practice
of justice under law (Genesis 18:19).
That it was, however, the principle
of justice, not only in the Catholic law
of nature, but also for the
Reformers, is proved by hundreds
of texts in Luther, Zwingli and Calvin.»
The task
of actualizing
justice is far more complex than the
Reformers saw it.
While Calvin seems to see more clearly than Luther the need for reforming the orders
of the world guided by love and
justice, both
Reformers see the organization
of society in terms which we know are far too simple in the light
of the later history
of democratic forms
of political life.
To be fair to Kierkegaard, he acknowledges the good intentions
of the social
reformers» drive toward equality, although «worldly equality, even if it were possible, is not Christian equality».20 He criticizes the caste system.21 Despite these concessions to the need for social
justice Kierkegaard's doctrine remains inadequate.
In spite
of the faith
of the 18th - and 19th - century political
reformers such as Voltaire and Marx in the «verdict
of history,» the arena
of political decisions is not likely to be a place where the big issues
of life are discussed or decided solely or even primarily on the basis
of truth and
justice.
The vanguard
of reformers for peace,
justice and ecological sustainability are not the political leaders.
Former state Supreme Court and Appellate Division
Justice Michael Kavanagh gave Faso his backing, calling the conservative
reformer, «a public servant who shares my ideals and the ideals
of the district where he has lived for more than three decades.
But the idea
of closing the aging jails on the island, to criminal
justice reformers, accomplishes several goals at once.
Yet as Princeton University economist Thomas Leonard documents in his book Illiberal
Reformers (Princeton University Press, 2016) and former New York Times editor Adam Cohen reminds us in his book Imbeciles (Penguin, 2016), eugenics fever swept America in the early 20th century, culminating in the 1927 Supreme Court case Buck v. Bell, in which the
justices legalized sterilization
of «undesirable» citizens.
Reformers who have been eager to embrace the social
justice orthodoxy
of that movement could not be expected to push back meaningfully.
When I published a piece earlier this year about the tense estrangement between conservative education
reformers and the movement's increasingly dominant social justice wing, it did not sit well with members of the latter group, including Rhames, who penned a response on Education Post titled, «An Open Letter to White Conservative Education Reformer
reformers and the movement's increasingly dominant social
justice wing, it did not sit well with members
of the latter group, including Rhames, who penned a response on Education Post titled, «An Open Letter to White Conservative Education
ReformersReformers.»
Education
reformers who are reflexively critical
of DeVos are framing a narrow set
of policies — the ones they prefer — as the very definition
of «school choice,» «
justice,» «morality,» or «accountability.»
The priorities and language
of reformers — achievement gaps, no - excuses schools, social
justice, and the «civil rights issue
of our generation «-- betrays a focus on fixing schools attended by urban, low - income families
of color.
And the use
of race as a proxy by some
reformers, to gauge the seriousness
of other
reformers» commitments to issues
of social
justice, is a relatively new phenomenon.
I told this story to a group
of two dozen or so
of my fellow ed
reformers last week at an American Enterprise Institute convening on «race, social
justice, and school reform» because I wanted to make two simple (some will say simplistic) points: our expensive and aggressive ed reform efforts still focus far too little on what kids do in school all day; and we don't all have the same ideas about what it means to serve the cause
of social
justice — or whether it is even appropriate to place social
justice issues at the heart
of our efforts to improve outcomes for kids.
«Like the proverbial frog in a pot, education
reformers on the political right find themselves coming to a slow boil in the cauldron
of social
justice activism.
Rick Hess fingers the
reformers» social
justice agenda, which is at odds with the interests
of middle class suburban parents.
It is crucial to recognize that «
reformers,» not educators, have driven this shift: In a 2008 survey, for instance, education pollsters Steve Farkas and Anne Duffett asked, «For the public schools to help the U.S. live up to its ideals
of justice and equality, do you think it's more important that they focus equally on all students regardless
of their backgrounds or achievement levels... or disadvantaged students who are struggling academically?»
Pondiscio is speaking for them when he complains «[l] ike the proverbial frog in a pot, education
reformers on the political right find themselves coming to a slow boil in the cauldron
of social
justice activism.»
For school
reformers and criminal
justice reform advocates, tackling the solidarity mindsets
of the teaching and law enforcement professions is critical to the systemic overhauls
of both sectors.
As far as the police union boss is concerned, criminal
justice reformers are wrong in criticizing Pantaleo's state - sanctioned murder
of Garner as well as criticizing those in the rank - and - file who are engaged in abusing citizens and other forms
of corruption.
Especially with a cadre
of new governors and legislators taking office, along with issues that intersect with education such as criminal
justice reform on the agenda,
reformers should use the time now to pass meaningful legislation that will help all
of our children.
That and the not so poetic
justice that Bridgeport's children and teachers are being played by the likes
of Finch, Vallas and the «education
reformers.»
Given Trump's general opposition to criminal
justice reform, the antipathy among Republicans and many conservative
reformers to the Black Lives Matter movement (which has championed Obama's efforts), and the skepticism among so - called conservative
reformers (most - notably Michael Petrilli
of the Thomas B. Fordham Institute and his amen corner at Education Next) on school discipline reform, expect nothing more after January.
But to
reformers, it is easier to fix the schools or the
justice system than to go after all overwhelming unfairnesses
of history.
«If we actually want to change the way that education or criminal
justice look in this country, we as
reformers need to show at least some appreciation for how hard the jobs
of teachers or cops are, and focus on the politicians.»
Meanwhile Malkin seems to ignore the reality that the nation's criminal
justice systems are in as sore a need
of reform as public education — and that as school
reformers, Teach For America alumni and staffers can no more ignore the consequences
of those woes on children outside
of schools than the crises within them.
Teach For America alum such as Deray McKesson are rightfully standing with criminal
justice reformers on behalf
of children who must deal with issues outside as well as inside
of schools.
Notable participants include: choreographer and dancer Kyle Abraham; poet Elizabeth Alexander; performer Eric Berryman; performance and installation artist Tania Bruguera; urban revitalization strategist Majora Carter; innovator James Burling Chase; actress and playwright Eisa Davis; architect Elizabeth Diller; The Met's Kimberly Drew; photographer John Edmonds; juvenile
justice reformer Adam Foss; writer and performance artist Malik Gaines; social practice artist Theaster Gates; filmmaker Tony Gerber; FLEXN dance pioneer Reggie (Regg Roc) Gray; trombonist, painter, and composer Dick Griffin; dancer and choreographer Francesca Harper; trombonist Craig Harris; vocalist Nona Hendryx; playwright Branden Jacobs - Jenkins; cinematographer Arthur Jafa; artist and cultural worker Shani Jamila; trumpeter JAWWAAD; gaming pioneers Navid and Vassiliki Khonsari; NYU Professor and musician Jason King; philosopher Gregg Lambert; composer and Bang on the Can co-founder David Lang; novelist, filmmaker, and curator Ernie Larsen; Wooster Group founding member and director Liz LeCompte; Harvard Professor Sarah Lewis; journalist Seamus McGraw; poet Aja Monet; jazz pianist and composer Jason Moran; performance studies professor Fred Moten; visual artist Shirin Neshat; playwright Lynn Nottage; professor
of contemporary rhetorical theory Kendall Phillips; doctor Jeremy Richman; poet Carl Hancock Rux; performance artist Alexandro Segade; writer and activist Tanya Selvaratnam; guitarist and composer Marvin Sewell; playwright and actress Anna Deavere Smith; conceptual artist Hank Willis Thomas; performance artist Carmelita Tropicana; puppeteer Basil Twist; theater director Roberta Uno; vocalist and composer Imani Uzuri; and Wooster Group founding member and actress Kate Valk, among others.
«
Reformers should take the approach that a thorough hearing is called for,» said Eric Sterling, director
of the Criminal
Justice Policy Foundation.
Of course, there are many things that
justice system
reformers, including mediators, still need to work on.
legal service is a matter
of limited but uneasy debate in the community
of reformers, progressives and do - gooders dedicated to the concept
of equal access to
justice for everyone.
Generally lauded by judges and leaders
of the profession, the long - term systemic value
of pro bono legal service is a matter
of limited but uneasy debate in the community
of reformers, progressives and do - gooders dedicated to the concept
of equal access to
justice for everyone.
This column is an unintended and rather abstract follow - up to my last column entitled «Self - Represented Litigants Are Not Things» on the need for
reformers to better consider the unique «real life» perspectives
of lay litigants when redesigning
justice system rules and processes.
The law has long been a target
of criminal
justice reformers, who have argued that the severe, mandatory minimum penalties contemplated by Tennessee's School Zone law fail to make appropriate distinctions between people who sell drugs to children and people who don't...
Let's start with the obvious: I think Rick Hasen is exactly right to suggest that such a move by the lefties is actually a «relative victory» for campaign finance
reformers, given the extent to which» [t] aking the case would have been an opportunity for the majority
of Supreme Court
justices to make things worse [from the
reformers» perspective], such as by suggesting that limits on direct contributions to candidates are unconstitutional.»
The McDonald's hot coffee case was actively lauded by tort «
reformers» as an example
of all that was wrong with the American civil
justice system.
One reason for this holding was the fact that the old law was, as
Justice MacDonnell put it, «the subject
of uniformly withering criticism from law
reformers, academics and all levels
of the Canadian judiciary for more than 30 years» (par.