If a higher conventional loan limit is not
justified by market values, then lenders have additional risk.
Not exact matches
Even if the discounts persist, those discounts seem justifiable only for stock
market reasons, and seem in no way
justified by underlying business
value considerations.
On page 206 Graham states, «On the whole it may be better for the investor to do his stock buying whenever he has money to put in stocks, EXCEPT when the general
market level is much higher than can be
justified by well - established standards of
value.»
Whatever the judge's rationale, it would still be based upon his intepretation of the legal principles of his precedents of choice, with that intellectual process being a similar procedure used
by real estate appraisers when establishing their opinions of so - called
market values of subject properties
by choosing certain comparable sales from amongst many available to
justify said opinions.
You
justify the practice
by saying the public doesn't understand how the commission is split and just how little comes down to the salesperson; the public doesn't understand how much time you spend with buyers who don't buy, so your time has been wasted; the public doesn't understand just what your costs are to
market a property, whether it sells or not; the public doesn't understand how much
value you add to the whole transaction.
Justifying your commission rate
by attempting to promote the
value of an agent and all that they do to
market the property is not the right road to travel for this conversation.