Yet since the times of Plato, rationalists have insisted that we simply pursue what is «rational» and what can be
justified by logic.
More often, it was
justified by the logic that higher performing students could provide further support for struggling students or reduce stigma.
- Third, this should go without saying, but the reason you won't find any Judgment validating your creative proposition is because its widely accepted that the fiscal transparency of EIGs is
justified by the logic of fiscal systems.
Not exact matches
In Kennedy's experience people buy
by emotion and then
justify their choice with
logic.
By calling the unknown God (especially in the Judeo - Christian tradition) you are making some great leaps of
logic that I don't think are
justified.
The point I am trying to make is that any «
logic» is the root of the problem, because any «
logic» can be
justified by the mind and is based on a limited and bias perception.
I have excluded Zeus
by using the laws of
logic which I can
justify in my worldview.
The same
logic that believers use to
justify their God as the one true God, can be used
by every other religion to invalidate theirs.
Such ends -
justify - the - means
logic is shortsighted; worse, it further undermines the framework set out
by the Constitution.
After doing so, I can help investigators sharpen their
logic by, for instance, suggesting information they should add to
justify their proposed research activities more convincingly or identifying red herrings (arguments that are not centrally relevant to the grant topic and may confuse the reviewer).
As all parties become compromised
by greed and ego, we're not sure who the heroes are, because all of these sectors
justify their respective
logics.
My Samhain books are listed at Amazon, who
justify swiping a massive 65 % off the list price
by the same
logic.
The
logic is that the S&P 500 was trading too high and not
justified by earnings per share figures as measured
by the previous ten years adjusted for inflation (per the CPI index).
As always, I remain open to the possibility that new evidence may emerge to document benefits from such diets that might
justify the risks they present, but for now this feeding approach appears to be simply another form of CAM mythology supported only
by anecdote and unsound
logic.
In
logic, if one is to avoid radical skepticism for skepticism of a more deliniated form with respect to empirical conclusions
justified by reference to evidence, one can not offer a broad, philosophic argument that
by its very nature would undermine all human thought, but one must provide arguments of a more deliniated form.
Bob, I certainly couldn't hold a candle to you in terms of scientific knowledge or background, but I find your premises and
logic baffling, as you knew, a priori exactly what point you wanted to make, and knew you could make it
by throwing out the places on the planet where the first and most severe impacts of AGW have been projected to be seen, and are being seen, and then you mischaracterize the nature of polar amplification to try and further
justify your point.
R Gates says, ``... I find your premises and
logic baffling, as you knew, a priori exactly what point you wanted to make, and knew you could make it
by throwing out the places on the planet where the first and most severe impacts of AGW have been projected to be seen, and are being seen, and then you mischaracterize the nature of polar amplification to try and further
justify your point.»
4) All of this to
justify what is
by Popperian
logic unjustifiable.