Besides invoking the European Convention
of Human Rights (the Convention) «
margin of appreciation» (para 125), he suggested (paras 118 — 20) that if Convention rights were engaged, restriction could be
justified by protection
of the traditional family.
To her dismay, the ECtHR found in favour
of the UK on the basis that the existing rules were within the government's
margin of appreciation; the provisions were proportionate and
justified to protect defendants from stale claims (see Stubbings v United Kingdom (Applications 22083 / 93, 22095 / 93)(1996) 23 EHRR 213).